Dedans Penthouse
Legend
Fed's got the GS record and a broader range of titles while Nadal's got the h2h by a wide margin. So who's the GOAT, or should we wait until they're both done playing?
Haha, you got me - well played.I am torn between two answers.
1) It is a amazing
2) Connors in 5
What do you think?
Fed's got the GS record and a broader range of titles while Nadal's got the h2h by a wide margin. So who's the GOAT, or should we wait until they're both done playing?
2000 posts are you're still yet to comprehend that the head to head doesn't matter. Whole achievements matter such as winning majors or holding the #1 ranking.Fed's got the GS record and a broader range of titles while Nadal's got the h2h by a wide margin. So who's the GOAT, or should we wait until they're both done playing?
Spot on kanamit! We need many more of these GOAT threads.Oh, yes. This is a thread that was just dying to be made since this topic is rarely ever discussed in these parts.
There you have it folks. Fed and put it to bed.17-12. Thread over.
Were yuo durnk or stnoned when yuo psoted taht??2000 posts are you're still yet to comprehend ....
here.
Fed's got the GS record and a broader range of titles while Nadal's got the h2h by a wide margin. So who's the GOAT, or should we wait until they're both done playing?
I am torn between two answers.
1) It is a amazing
2) Connors in 5
What do you think?
Is this on clay?
I definitely think Nadal is better than Federer on clay.
Then again, I think Nadal is better than anyone ever on clay and I think it's highly likely to stay that way until I'm either too old to care or am dead.
That is a pretty convincing way to look at it.AO: Federer, Agassi, Djokovic
FO: Nadal
W: Federer, Sampras
USO: Federer, Sampras, Connors
tough choice, brother
Why did you have to bring your death into all this ?
AO: Federer, Agassi, Djokovic
FO: Nadal
W: Federer, Sampras
USO: Federer, Sampras, Connors
tough choice, brother
Djokovic>Nadal>Federer
Djokovic has many more slams in him. And he just like Federer wins many RG's if it wasn't for Nadal.One thing is absolutely for sure: Djokovic is not in the equation at all, not even close. He may come to be in time, but it is a bit of an insult to Nadal and Federer to include him right now. 6 slams and an inferior H2H against either. In fact, take 2011 out of the equation (which let's be fair Djok hasn't looked like repeating since) and he is even further off. If you are including Djokovic then you may as well be including Wilander and Edberg.
Rosol > Nadal > Federer > DjokovicDjokovic>Nadal>Federer
Well when it comes to numbers, Federer's 17 Slams trumps Nadal's 12. Most casual fans and non-tennis fans will stop there.
But when you take a closer look, you have to take into consideration that Federer played against a very weak field from 2003-2007.
The weakest field in tennis history. There was really no true formidable foe that was talented enough to challenge Federer back then.
That's very debatable. What makes you think his era was weak? Is there good evidence that his opponents were weaker than ones Sampras played against in 1993-2000?Well when it comes to numbers, Federer's 17 Slams trumps Nadal's 12. Most casual fans and non-tennis fans will stop there.
But when you take a closer look, you have to take into consideration that Federer played against a very weak field from 2003-2007.
The weakest field in tennis history. There was really no true formidable foe that was talented enough to challenge Federer back then.
finally someone who believes in weak era federer era was a cOMPLETE JOKE
And when Donald Young retires.As of now Fed but it will be definitive once they both retire.
Well, Nadal's won more Monte Carlo's so..I guess Nadal?
RNadal has never won Cincy, RFederer has multiple titles in Cincy. Cincy is known as the real slam
AO: Federer, Agassi, Djokovic
FO: Nadal
W: Federer, Sampras
USO: Federer, Sampras, Connors
tough choice, brother
Well when it comes to numbers, Federer's 17 Slams trumps Nadal's 12. Most casual fans and non-tennis fans will stop there.
But when you take a closer look, you have to take into consideration that Federer played against a very weak field from 2003-2007.
The weakest field in tennis history. There was really no true formidable foe that was talented enough to challenge Federer back then.