I miss the days when Nadal was number two. Entering every game, it never looked like he was going to dominate anyone--his game was not technically overwhelming or smooth. However, he gave you that "raw", unrefined feel--it's almost as if a talented caveman came out to play tennis. He grinds every point the way he hit his topspin forehand--with relentless brutality and murderous instinct. When technically overwhelmed, he finds a way to beat you; when in the worst possible situation in a point, he finds a way to pass you. He gave you that feeling--the feeling that he was never going down even if you threw the kitchen sink at him.
Now, he is more consistent and complete than before, but he never gives out that "raw" aura anymore--it was gone with his capri days, his no.2 days.
He got pretty lucky at IW this year with Murray and djoker dropping out.
Nadal beat the man who beat Murray and Djokovic, i.e. del Potro.
Nadal beat the man who beat Djokovic at FO2011, doesn't mean Nadal would have beaten Djokovic.
It doesn't matter. Federer beat Djokovic in the semi final, and Nadal beat Federer in the final to win the title. It's that simple.
You're just saying what happened, not what potentially could have happened. We all know what actually happened, so what's the point in reiterating it again and again. The purpose of a forum is to discuss all possibilities and combinations.
I could just as easily say that Federer beat Soderling in the 2009 French Open final, Soderling being the man who beat Nadal but that Nadal could have beaten Federer had he got to the final instead. The point is, it doesn't matter, because Nadal lost to Soderling, and Federer beat Soderling in the final to win the title.
I can see nadal at world no1 rank..maybe next year,
no way this year, can he get back to his old level on a regular basis ?..will his knee hold up ?..big questions.
Retirement is imminent
Nadal is close to retirement. His body is a wreck. He is playing because he has obligations and contracts. To get to number 1 he has to pass Djoker and Murray.
Murray has been in the final of last 3 majors, so he has improved big time.
Djoker is the one who can consistently beat Nadal on any surface and he just proved he is in good shape.
Now how a limping Nadal can take over the two? Why instead of dreaming you look at the numbers and the facts buddy
talking of facing facts 'buddy' :neutral:..
fact is that's a nice attempt at trolling but F A I L
carry on masturbating though, we all enjoy a good laugh :neutral:
?? Masturbating...trolling...good laugh....?
Something seriously wrong with you.
I thought you were asking for opinions and able of a normal conversation. Seems like you have mental issues.
He's 26 and the defending French Open champion. -_-
..... a talented caveman came out to play tennis.
I miss the days when Nadal was number two. Entering every game, it never looked like he was going to dominate anyone--his game was not technically overwhelming or smooth. However, he gave you that "raw", unrefined feel--it's almost as if a talented caveman came out to play tennis. He grinds every point the way he hit his topspin forehand--with relentless brutality and murderous instinct. When technically overwhelmed, he finds a way to beat you; when in the worst possible situation in a point, he finds a way to pass you. He gave you that feeling--the feeling that he was never going down even if you threw the kitchen sink at him.
Now, he is more consistent and complete than before, but he never gives out that "raw" aura anymore--it was gone with his capri days, his no.2 days.
hey the wife of the monaco king is sexy..but she doesnt look happy at all