B
BrokenGears
Guest
Question in title.
I'd say he gets AO 2019, AO 2020 and finishes off with AO 2021. Don't hold me to this though it's probably wrong.
*Quote for posterity.
I want to trade the 2019 USO for 2019 AO. Who's the rulemeister here and is that permitted?W & USO2019, USO2020, AO2021, W2022
5 more = 19
Better yet, loser has to imitate 90's Clay for a month.I'll bet you he wins a slam outside AO (at least.)
Loser has to kiss sureshs ass and like his posts on this board etc for a month
In gained the previous 13 GS titles, Djoker always defeated one his of the three biggest rivals - Federer, Nadal or Murray. The GS tournament, which won and didn't meet any of the three biggest rivals, he long deserved to win.5 weak era Slams.He already won one weak era Slam this year ( US Open 2018).What a cakewalk draw.
RealisticallyRealistically, Novak can get 2~3 AO, 1~2 RG, 1~2 WB, 2~3 USO in the next 5 years, which give him 20 to 24 total GS.
Novak could have 4 years like Federer's 04 - 07 period.
Realistically I could wake up a millionaire tomorrow if I enter the lottery.Realistically
No offense but beating Murray isn't a huge deal mate.In gained the previous 13 GS titles, Djoker always defeated one his of the three biggest rivals - Federer, Nadal or Murray. The GS tournament, which won and didn't meet any of the three biggest rivals, he long deserved to win.
Fed tanks to avoid H2H and now people are peddling another cakewalk draw5 weak era Slams.He already won one weak era Slam this year ( US Ope 2018).What a cakewalk draw.
At this point I have trouble seeing Federer having one more Slam in him. He's not only stopped winning tournaments, he's also started to lose to lower ranked opponents very consistently.The thing with Djokovic, Nadal and Federer, is they have all experienced that slump where retirement is a realistic possibility, yet have managed to bounce back by winning multiple slams. Logic suggests none of them will be able to do that again should they pick up another serious injury or major loss of form.
I think all 3 are riding their last big slam push, and I'd guess Federer has 1 more in him, probably Wimbledon (if at all). Nadal has a realistic shot at whatever FO he competes in, plus another potential US, so 3 more realistic slams for him. Djokovic is the freshest of the bunch, and his 2019 should be his final year of dominance - winning at least 2 slams, probably 3, and burning out in a blaze of glory before that lack of consistency creeps back in following the achievement of his goals (returning back to number 1 and a multiple slam winner).
I would guess 3 next year, 1 or 2 in 2020 and a realistic shot of 1 more beyond (if he doesn't retire).
How's Mugray doing?At this point I have trouble seeing Federer having one more Slam in him. He's not only stopped winning tournaments, he's also started to lose to lower ranked opponents very consistently.
At this point I have trouble seeing Federer having one more Slam in him. He's not only stopped winning tournaments, he's also started to lose to lower ranked opponents very consistently.
Lovely wife, nice family, rich enough that he never has to work a day in his life if he doesn't want to. Playing tennis solely because he loves it.How's Mugray doing?
What's there to talk about Djokodal tanking?Fed tanks to avoid H2H and now people are peddling another cakewalk draw
Let's talk 2018 Australian Open, no?
Not also better than anyone of the 20th century? I mean, Spencer Gore already played in the 19th.If he equals Federer’s total there would no longer be any doubt that Djokovic was the best player of the 21st Century.
I am not that sure the quality has remained. Fed's game is hyper aggressive, and if the footwork to support that goes his entire game goes down the drain. If his recovery isn't good enough anymore to sustain enough physical training/practice/matchplay then it's simply over.We all thought that before, and it took a prolonged period out of the game for him to rediscover his mojo. Who knows, maybe the realisation that he may decline fairly quickly over the next year or 2 will spur him on for one final push somewhere. His consistency is gone, but the quality remains.
Talking about tennis here not his personal life. When's the last time he made it to the second week in a major?Lovely wife, nice family, rich enough that he never has to work a day in his life if he doesn't want to. Playing tennis solely because he loves it.
How are you doing?
One of the wisest sentences ever said on this forumNo offense but beating Murray isn't a huge deal mate.
If is the key pointSeriously
If Djokovic plays at 90%, which player under 30 can stop him in Bo5?
If you name a player
Now try saying without bursting into tears laughing
Kyrgios, Nishikori, Goffin, a few others could come together and take him out a couple of times. Won't pose consistent problems but if they did it in 2014 they can do it today.Seriously
If Djokovic plays at 90%, which player under 30 can stop him in Bo5?
If you name a player
Now try saying without bursting into tears laughing