I think you mean Lukas ROSOLED, not roseledIf Rafa isnt on his A plus game and got tight he can be ROSELED very badly.
Lets assume this tournament was indeed weak. It still one tournament no where near 03 and 07. 4 years man He won 12 slams in that period.Give me a break. It's not a question whether Anderson can win, but rather how many games Nadal will let him win. Since I started following tennis, this is the biggest joke of a Grand Slam I've seen - both regarding level and the draw. However, with that said, Nadal is the only deserving winner of this tournament.
If Djokovic, Murray, Nishikori, Wawrinka, Raonic were in the draw, and Federer was healthy, this would be a totally different tournament. I mean, there is a reason Nadal hasn't claimed a HC title since Doha, 2014. It would be like Federer suddenly winning the French with no zoning players, the players mentioned above withdrawn and a Nadal on 30%.
Nadal will get #16, but if there ever is talk of weak era/draws during Federer's prime again, then the Rafa fans talking that way should be put in a room with the key thrown away.
Some of the clueless garbage on here never ceases to amaze. Unless they put grass down for Sunday Anderson will do well to get a set.If Rafa isnt on his A plus game and got tight he can be ROSELED very badly.
Lets assume this tournament was indeed weak. It still on tournament no where near 03 and 07. 4 years man He won 12 slams in that period.
I dont deny his greatness but he has weak competition during his peak years. That exactly 4 years. Not just one GS.If Federer is able to fight for number 1 at 36 while winning TWO Grand Slams, I think you should give some credit to the players who were his opponents in his peak physical years.
Lets assume this tournament was indeed weak. It still one tournament no where near 03 and 07. 4 years man He won 12 slams in that period.
Lets assume this tournament was indeed weak. It still one tournament no where near 03 and 07. 4 years man He won 12 slams in that period.
His main rivals were weak. Agassi was really old plus Hewitt and Roddick not ATG players.But his draws weren't weak. He was too good. Many fans simply use the weak era/draw card because it's unimaginable to them that a player could be that dominant. You gotta see the context...
His main rivals were weak. Agassi was really old plus Hewitt and Roddick not ATG players.
I dont deny his greatness but he has weak competition during his peak years. That exactly 4 years. Not just one GS.
They past eye test they dont the past the Fed test thats all ı care.At what premises they are weak? His opponents certanly pass the eye test in terms of quality but lets see their results, H2H vs Murray, Djokovic, Nadal:
Roddick 5-4 Djokovic, respectful vs Murray+Nadal
Davydenko 6-5 Nadal, respectful vs Djokovic+Murray
Safin faded past 2005, still 2-0 vs Djokovic
Blake 3-4 Nadal
Coria - incredible player
Nalbandian - what he did at Madrid/Paris 2007 is just ..
Agassi decent
You would say 2010-2011 bla bla but at that time those were already 30 or retired. You can make a point that once they faded away, Murray and Djokovic were able to step up
Anderson won't be push over trust me Rafa must play high level to winIf Rafa isnt on his A plus game and got tight he can be ROSELED very badly.
I expect Anderson to be nervous judging by his reaction to winning the SF.
That said, he is exactly the type of player to trouble Nadal on really any sort of court. Last two rounds he has been serving from a tree and ripping shots from both sides.
That said, I fully expect an easy Rafa win. 76 64 62 or so.
Unobjective comment. Nadal did defeat Delpo who was playing in a top 10 level. And Federer was not injured, he just was surpassed by Del Potro because of his wrong strategies (apporaching the net in bad moments and being too precipitated). Stop with the excuses. Seems like you can't accept that a healthy Federer lost to Del Potro.Give me a break. It's not a question whether Anderson can win, but rather how many games Nadal will let him win. Since I started following tennis, this is the biggest joke of a Grand Slam I've seen - both regarding level and the draw. However, with that said, Nadal is the only deserving winner of this tournament.
If Djokovic, Murray, Nishikori, Wawrinka, Raonic were in the draw, and Federer was healthy, this would be a totally different tournament. I mean, there is a reason Nadal hasn't claimed a HC title since Doha, 2014. It would be like Federer suddenly winning the French with no zoning players, the players mentioned above withdrawn and a Nadal on 30%.
Nadal will get #16, but if there ever is talk of weak era/draws during Federer's prime again, then the Rafa fans talking that way should be put in a room with the key thrown away.
Unobjective comment. Nadal did defeat Delpo who was playing in a top 10 level. And Federer was not injured, he just was surpassed by Del Potro because of his wrong strategies (apporaching the net in bad moments and being too precipitated). Stop with the excuses. Seems like you can't accept that a healthy Federer lost to Del Potro.
This tourny still better than RG and Wimbledon.Regardless of the result on sunday afternoon.Delpo was playing like a top 10 player for one set. Oh, Federer was moving like a cat, never moved or played better! And you say that I came with the unobjective comment? Lmao.
It's no excuse, it's facts. Rafa will win this tournament deservedly, like mentioned earlier, but that doesn't stop this tournament from being a complete joke. For some reason everyone knows it except some Rafa fans.
I can very well accept a fresh and healthy Federer to lose against Del Potro (like in the USO 09 final) or any other player.
Lets assume this tournament was indeed weak. It still one tournament no where near 03 and 07. 4 years man He won 12 slams in that period.
This tourny still better than RG and Wimbledon.Regardless of the result on sunday afternoon.
You guys do know Federer was carrying an injury and his preparation totally disrupted by it?
People who expected him to play his best seem like armchair fans who don't play sport at all.
You guys do know Federer was carrying an injury and his preparation totally disrupted by it?
People who expected him to play his best seem like armchair fans who don't play sport at all.
Anderson won't be push over trust me Rafa must play high level to win
Lets assume this tournament was indeed weak. It still one tournament no where near 03 and 07. 4 years man He won 12 slams in that period.
This tourny still better than RG and Wimbledon.Regardless of the result on sunday afternoon.
It obviously wasn't as bad as Montreal, but I don't think there's any way he would've played this week if it wasn't a Grand Slam tournament. In his press conference after the Delpo loss he said “Good thing is that I need a rest. I have a rest now, so that’s good. That’s actually the thing when I walked off the court, I was, like, Finally, I can rest,” Federer continued. “Because I’m tired. I put a lot into it. I was not sure I could play, to be honest, so I’m happy I get a rest now.”Are we talking about his back? I didn't realize it was affecting him that badly. Seems everyone except Nadal was injured this year.
I dont deny his greatness but he has weak competition during his peak years. That exactly 4 years. Not just one GS.
I can only assume you didn't watch tennis in that period.Lets assume this tournament was indeed weak. It still one tournament no where near 03 and 07. 4 years man He won 12 slams in that period.
On a medium speed hard court Nadal I don't think has ever lost to a serve bot.