Why does Asia only have one Masters 1000? Why not make Tokyo a Masters 1000? Also, Latin America should have a Masters 1000.
The ATP needs to be smarter about marketing the game to a global audience. Asia is a huge fan base that is neglected.
As for the US having 3 Masters, I would say that it is historically justified. Also, let's not forget that the US is a huge tennis market that only recently has seen its product diminish. All three are very good events in my opinion with rich tradition. I'd like to go to both Miami and Cincy at some point.
Completely agree, but the calendar is tight, especially in Olympic years and more so now that Federer and his Corporation have muscled the Laver Cup into the lineup, which Fed trusts will be a perpetual money-maker for him long after he retires. Just hard to know how to fit in these meritorious ideas - grass masters somewhere, Har Tru ™, carpet, a significant India or South Africa tournament, South America, middle/eastern europe, Japan. The schedule is pretty gruelling already, although converting a few of these hard court tourneys to grass, Har Tru ™, indoor carpet, would ease the wear and tear.
Besides reflecting the booming internationalization of tennis, balancing the surface mix, as well as the geographic, would encourage greater variety in playing strategies and styles. All good.