Interesting Fed statistic

D

Deleted member 777746

Guest
So in his most statistically dominant year, Federer still lost to Novak Djokovic in 4 sets at his two best slams. That's rough man
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
So in his most statistically dominant year, Federer still lost to Novak Djokovic in 4 sets at his two best slams. That's rough man

Fed lost to Seppi at the AO in 4 sets and Wawrinka in straights sets at RG (without breaking him), lulz.
Guess that's what happens when you have hatred sown in your head - you make a joke out of yourself and lose sanity/common sense.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Fed not playing a 5 setter in 2015 shows he was efficient in dismissing his opponents, but it also means that his stamina was extremely questionable that year. Him failing to even push Seppi to 5 at the AO kinda shows how weak his stamina was. And that was at the beginning of the year.
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
I was expecting such a post ;)

Well played (y)
Now that's total ownage. Slayed.

200.gif
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
So in his most statistically dominant year, Federer still lost to Novak Djokovic in 4 sets at his two best slams. That's rough man

Fed got straight-setted by Seppi and his pigeon Stan in slams in his most dominant year?
 
D

Deleted member 777746

Guest
Fed got straight-setted by Seppi and his pigeon Stan in slams in his most dominant year?
That's what happens when you're finally confronted with competition. See Fed's response to Djokodal when they emerged
 
Top