James Blake has 3 racquets, but 4.0s on this board need 20 matched k90s.
nice, real nice.
Wow, this really is a special interview... how often do you come across pro's discussing their views on their frames in such detail? And it confirms a lot of ppls views on modern v older frames re material composition and performance... BTW, I'm with Xenakis - he should contact Paul or Sven at Vantage!R.
You aren't even connected to the industry. Please stop talking as though you know how companies like Dunlop/Head/Wilson etc. work. Blake has issues with his strokes/timing, not JUST his equipment as he has stated.Most likely not. Tennis is just one business group among many that shares the carbon graphite sheets/processes currently used in mfg.
Maybe my logic is flawed here, but isn't part of the problem according to James himself is the feel of the new racquets. He's playing with old frames that have been broken in and probably feel nowhere close to what they played like in the beginning. So even if he was able to get sticks to the same specs they would take time to break and have the same feel to them, would they not?
I think the main issue is inside his head (epecially after watching his relentless back and forth with with chair umpire last night at IW.)
Since James mold is from Tyger (or so i've heard on these boards) why can't he just contact them directly? I mean, they are still making racquets based off that mold (Exel Drive C20, same headsize and all).
Well, Blake mentions that in the interview giving some credence to it. But he says that the newer frames don't "feel" like his old frames even when both were new. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if Dunlop had run 250 off for Blake some years ago and now his stock is running out.
If he learned to adjust to the feel of his rackets as they broke down, I doubt his perception of how his rackets felt new is accurate anymore - especially considering that those racquets were new over a decade ago????
Well you've heard wrong, Tyger doesn't make rackets but copy or use molds from other brands. The racket James plays has absolutely nothing in common with Tyger, it is a Dunlop mold (and racket).
if only Blake would have made that extra 20 grand at IW he could find some decent rackets.
Theres something that i don't get it, James play AO with the BLX 90 right? is he still using that frame??
What are you talking about?
Companies are bending over backwards trying to make frames for him. They want to make frames he's willing to use and endorse so that they can make money off his brand.
He's just not willing to compromise his performance to switch. Although for some, his "performance" being debatable, given Blake's game, as he illustrated in the interview, his game is high risk and has little room for error. He's looking for "that certain feel" and a frame that gets him that little bit of dip at the end of a full-court ground stroke or return. Even if it's out by a millimeter using a "new" frame (as confirmed by Hawk-eye), out is out.
As for newer materials not being "better" than the old? I assume the graphite is better in the sense that it's finer, lighter, and stronger. Better for other uses, if not most things. As someone pointed out earlier, tennis isn't the only industry that uses carbon fiber. Newer materials might be better but it is different.
I do buy into the newer materials having a different feel. Pick up an old but in decent shape Prince Graphite from the late 80's and give it a whirl. You can feel the fibers grabbing onto each other kinda like velcro.
Well you've heard wrong, Tyger doesn't make rackets but copy or use molds from other brands. The racket James plays has absolutely nothing in common with Tyger, it is a Dunlop mold (and racket).
oh yeah they are bending over "backwards" to supply some nonexistent perfect racket to some 30 year old guy who is sliding down the rankings faster than bode miller does a dowhill. there are just NO rackets out there good enough for Mr. James Blake. I guess it's because he can't afford them? Somehow the 51 or some odd pros ahead of James in the rankings have found something that is acceptable. Blake's brand only has high status with a small but annoying group of fans in NYC called the "J BLOCK".
James' racquets come from the mold: PT 924_0
......Paul was, after all Head of racket development at Dunlop, he may be able to help. It would be interesting to hear him comment.
I'd of thought that their pathes may of crossed in the past, if only Blake saw this thread we could point him to vantage now and his career could gt going in ernest again.
I think James is full of it;
It's not the materials in modern racquets, it's the fact that someone isn't making him a custom layup with a custom mold any more. So obviously a stock BLX90 isn't going to feel as good to him as his old custom racquets that were designed for him.
Although I do admit that off-the-shelf racquets nowadays don't have the same labor an cost-intensive processes that made racquets so much better back in the day...
But I don't think it's the materials as much as it is the layup, and the process.
FYI, AG300T 4D uses the same mold as Tomas Berdych's frame but has different lay-up. Berdych's frame is a bit softer and more powerful.
To keep it simple -
Hotmelt is where the resin is heated before being applied to the dry carbon cloth. Gives good uniformaty and saturation.
"Standard" prepreg is achieved by pulling the carbon through a cold resin bath. Prone to less consistant coverage and possible dry spots.
In many racquets, a combination of both materials are used.
The "feel" element comes from a variety of factors such as material mix percentages, layup design for each layer, Grade or quality of the raw carbon cloth.
Whilst some of the older grades of carbon are no longer available, its still possible to re-create the old school feel.. just costs a few more $$ and needs a bit more thought
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you. It's just that even at his current #52, there are less than 10 guys in the top fifty that are more marketable than Blake. Sad but true.
IMO, the fact that Prince and Dunlop were (perhaps the optimal word here) in development for a frame specifically for him is "bending over backwards." Not every player gets that sort of treatment.
I think you're kind of looking in the rear view mirror with regard to James. His star power is rapidly diminishing.
James' racquets come from the mold: PT 924_0
Yeah, you're right. But.....as for a player being able to sell stuff with a lower/fluctuating or non-existent ranking, look at Sharapova with Nike and Prince and Kournikova with K-Swiss.
As for Blake and his rackets, for a guy that broke his neck a couple of years back, sucking it up and using a new frame should be looked at as a blessing. Hell, he could even secure additional endorsement dollars before he hangs it up.
His Dunlop's are not a custom mold. Blakes's racquets as well as the Dunlop Aerogel 4D 300 TOUR come from the same MOLD as the old Dunlop Revelation Tour 95. Berdych's old Dunlop racquets came from the same MOLD as well.
Blake is back to his old Dunlop. However Dunlop is unable to manufacture his racquets the way he likes because the same raw materials are no longer available. That is a fact.
But the former designer from Dunlop who posts regualy can design and manufacture the racquets Blake would like.
I continue to be in awe of your posts. You are definitely one of the best resources for the truth on the boards. Please keep up the good work. Excellent post(s)!!!!!
Specs James Blake YMTP03011XF DUNLOP TENNIS PT-924 309+/-2 320+/-3 67.5+/-1 97
James Blake has 3 racquets, but 4.0s on this board need 20 matched k90s.
nice, real nice.
Do you mean the retail 4D 300 Tour? If so, and given that it's listed at 98 sq in: is the 300 Tour really a 95, or was the Rev Tour 95 really a 98?His Dunlop's are not a custom mold. Blakes's racquets as well as the Dunlop Aerogel 4D 300 TOUR come from the same MOLD as the old Dunlop Revelation Tour 95. Berdych's old Dunlop racquets came from the same MOLD as well.
Hard to believe this guy can't find a frame on the planet he likes.
Federer found one.
Nadal found one.
But JAMES BLAKE can't find a frame to work with?
He's not exactly top tier, anyway.
IMO, Blake should have stayed with the Wilsons.