Most objective Federer vs Nadal head to head.

[Backspin1183]

To be fair to both players, we should count the matches that were played on their best surfaces, clay for Nadal and grass for Federer. Nadal is the king of clay and Federer is the king of grass.

Nadal leads 13-2 (86.66%) on clay while Federer leads 2-1 (66.66%) on grass. Overall, Nadal leads the head to head 14-4 (77.77%) vs Federer. This is the most objective Fedal H2H. Most objective fans would agree.

 

[Deleted member 688153]

You also have to exclude losses, but to make it fair we'll exclude losses for both.

So 0-0.

 

[TahoeTennis]

War is over fedal united

 

[True Fanerer]

 

[Backspin1183]

War is over fedal united

 

[ghostofMecir]

Didn’t expect such a new idea for a thread. Nice.

 

[tennis_pro]

Just 2 more weeks, man, we can make it.

 

[gplracer]

This is a silly thread and it makes no sense.

 

[Mazz Retic]

10char

 

[Jackuar]

No, not again.... Give it a break, that horse is dead, yet stamped, beaten, squished and its starting to rot.

The two are two ATGs and to each fan his own. One doesn't need a proof to call his player the great.

 

[metsman]

They really don't make em like they used to

 

[Sudacafan]

There is not something as Fed-Nadal objective H2H.

 

[Service Ace]

Who let their 6 year old create a TTW account?

 

[tennisaddict]

They really don't make em like they used to

Bull Z and Dark Knight at least had some trolling skills . The VB clan these days just sucks

 

[BeatlesFan]

The VB clan these days just sucks

 

[Username_]

Where's 90's Clay when u need him?

 

[uscwang]

At least add indoor to Fed's grass.

 

[junior74]

You can also say Nadal totally dominates clay, but Federer leads grass and HC. So surface wise: Fed leads 2-1.

To be fair to the players; Let's remove clay and grass: Federer leads 11-9.

Nadal has won 22 of his 30 Masters on clay. There is no Masters on grass, so Federer has won 23 masters outside his favourite surface. Nadal 8

Nadal's clay prowess has clearly affected this rivalry, that's objective to say.

It's objective to say: Had Federer been worse on clay, his rivalry against Nadal would have been a lot better.

I think all tennis fans would agree

 

[Backspin1183]

Where's 90's Clay when u need him?

Oh right. He would have been very offended by me calling Roger the king of grass.

 

[Spencer Gore]

Surely the most objective H2H is...ahem...the actual H2H?

 

[Deleted member 307496]

Bull Z and Dark Knight at least had some trolling skills . The VB clan these days just sucks

TDK sucked dude.

6-3, 6-1, 6-0 was pretty funny sometimes though - just because of how over the top and ridiculous some of his posts were.

Backspin isn't a troll though IMO - he can be a decent poster; just likes to stir the pot a little.

 

[Deleted member 307496]

Oh right. He would have been very offended by me calling Roger the king of grass.

Fed never had to deal with grass greats like Krajicek dude.

 

[-NN-]

I can't tell if this is legit or not.

 

[N01E]

I think that "subjective" is the word you're looking for.

 

[thrust]

You can also say Nadal totally dominates clay, but Federer leads grass and HC. So surface wise: Fed leads 2-1.

To be fair to the players; Let's remove clay and grass: Federer leads 11-9.

Nadal has won 22 of his 30 Masters on clay. There is no Masters on grass.

Nadal's clay prowess has clearly affected this rivalry, that's objective to say.

It's objective to say: Had Federer been worse on clay, his rivalry against Nadal would have been a lot better.

I think all tennis fans would agree

Suppose there were 2 slams on clay instead of hard courts, how many slams would Nadal have then?

 

[Deleted member 307496]

Suppose there were 2 slams on clay instead of hard courts, how many slams would Nadal have then?

Suppose there were 2 slams on grass instead of hard courts, how many slams would Federer have then?

 

[thrust]

Suppose there were 2 slams on grass instead of hard courts, how many slams would Federer have then?

Then Rafa and Roger would be just about even in slam count.

 

[cc0509]

To be fair to both players, we should count the matches that were played on their best surfaces, clay for Nadal and grass for Federer. Nadal is the king of clay and Federer is the king of grass.

Nadal leads 13-2 (86.66%) on clay while Federer leads 2-1 (66.66%) on grass. Overall, Nadal leads the head to head 14-4 (77.77%) vs Federer. This is the most objective Fedal H2H. Most objective fans would agree.

We got the memo: Federer lost way too many slam matches to Nadal in the past, matches he never should have lost(off clay.) But it's now 2017 and in 2017, Nadal was clueless against Federer.

 

[Deleted member 743561]

If Federer wins one more major title, he'll be out of digits on which to count them.

 

[Sudacafan]

Federer plays the nicest style, but Nadal wins the matches. 2017 is too little too late.
It may happen in all levels.
The guy in the club with the awful strokes beating the virtuosos.
It’s a cruel world.

 

[Red Rick]

You also have to exclude losses, but to make it fair we'll exclude losses for both.

So 0-0.

Awesome, I have the same H2H vs Nadal as Federer. Red Rick Co Goat

 

[Chadillac]

This would of a been a great thread 3 years ago, when nadal last beat the maestro