Wawrinka, Dolgopolov, Ferrer, Almagro...
God damn, which pigeon is next? Fed????
If he loses to Fed, then we'll really know it's over.
Wawrinka, Dolgopolov, Ferrer, Almagro...
God damn, which pigeon is next? Fed????
If he loses to Fed, then we'll really know it's over.
Wawrinka, Dolgopolov, Ferrer, Almagro...
God damn, which pigeon is next? Fed????
If he loses to Fed, then we'll really know it's over.
Wawrinka, Dolgopolov, Ferrer, Almagro...
God damn, which pigeon is next? Fed????
If he loses to Fed, then we'll really know it's over.
Oh no no no. Next up - Berdych. :lol:
It would be very humiliating.If he loses to Fed, then we'll really know it's over.
yeah... i mean... how long can a stash last?
Oh boy, someone is losing composure......I mean.... do you ever give up with that slanderous crap? Since 2007 you've being do this I presume, you'd think you'd grow up or clear off! Every time I glance at the comments you pop up with some asinine BS which you can't back up.
Moron..can you prove it in a court of law that Nadal doped or used PED's? No you can't.
I think this is his 9th loss since the US open. I have lost track.
His 2013 reminds me of Federer's 2008. Federer started to lose to the players he had owned or whom he had never lost to (Stepanek, Karlovic, Roddick, Blake, Simon, Fish etc).
Nadal's case is similar (Dolgopolov, Wawrinka, Ferrer, Almagro). Regardless of what happens at the FO, he can be (and he is) proud of what he's achieved.
He's become a tennis legend.
He's like Muster in 1997 on the clay at the moment, i.e. a big collapse in clay form after years of dominating on clay.
I mean.... do you ever give up with that slanderous crap? Since 2007 you've being do this I presume, you'd think you'd grow up or clear off! Every time I glance at the comments you pop up with some asinine BS which you can't back up.
Moron..can you prove it in a court of law that Nadal doped or used PED's? No you can't.
I can understand riling up the fans for a laugh but sometimes there's that line (I do it), I guess Barbara Streisand was right when she was talking about those "little people"
I wouldn't go that far. Let's see what happens in Madrid and Rome. If he loses in both then yeah he is not winning FO unless Nole is out before the final.
Well noticed.
It looks like a typical post-27 decline, or at least the start of it. The big question will be, will it be a slow and gradual process, like Fed's?
I'd also like to emphasize that 'being in decline' surely doesn't equal "will win zilch from now on".
It's funny because I've always argued against the decline theory until this year when for the first time, I see a clear deterioration of his game even on clay, and I would almost have to say: especially on clay. Movement, offensiveness, accuracy, confidence, everything is off. Usually, it comes together once the clay season starts but not this time. Temporary lapse or beginning of the end? I guess there is a reason why no man has ever won a tournament more than 7 or 8 times. The greatest champs cannot be impervious to wearout in the end.
When it comes to this rivalry, this would be the luck of a Fed fan: Nadal will probably lose to Berdych in Madrid, Donald Young in Rome, then straight set Fed in the final at RG.
When it comes to this rivalry, this would be the luck of a Fed fan: Nadal will probably lose to Berdych in Madrid, Donald Young in Rome, then straight set Fed in the final at RG.
It's funny because I've always argued against the decline theory until this year when for the first time, I see a clear deterioration of his game even on clay, and I would almost have to say: especially on clay. Movement, offensiveness, accuracy, confidence, everything is off. Usually, it comes together once the clay season starts but not this time. Temporary lapse or beginning of the end? I guess there is a reason why no man has ever won a tournament more than 7 or 8 times. The greatest champs cannot be impervious to wearout in the end.
Please do not give marketing and advertising money ideas. :twisted:Fed would truly be a GOAT of GOAT to make another (6th) FO final at this age.
Well noticed.
It looks like a typical post-27 decline, or at least the start of it. The big question will be, will it be a slow and gradual process, like Fed's?
I'd also like to emphasize that 'being in decline' surely doesn't equal "will win zilch from now on".
I think we should wait till Madrid and Rome. He might have shaken off whatever is bothering him by that point!
It's funny because I've always argued against the decline theory until this year when for the first time, I see a clear deterioration of his game even on clay, and I would almost have to say: especially on clay. Movement, offensiveness, accuracy, confidence, everything is off. Usually, it comes together once the clay season starts but not this time. Temporary lapse or beginning of the end? I guess there is a reason why no man has ever won a tournament more than 7 or 8 times. The greatest champs cannot be impervious to wearout in the end.
I agree. If he seems to keep struggling while playing the next two masters, then I will begin to wonder if he is in decline. It's obvious that something isn't quite right, but I think it's too soon still to say if he is in a terrible downward spiral or not.
But I think more player actually think that they can beat him now
He will decline faster because of the grinding style. But last year his hard court performance was so good that there is a chance that he can change his style into more first strike tennis. That probably will only happen afyer then FO fort is lost.
According to the VB, when Nadal loses he is unsettled for his next tournament.
Does that mean, that he is going out early in Madrid?
Also, I haven't heard of any injury from his camp. I am shocked.
P.S. Nice to see some of the VB members start singing the tune that "the age does matter". They will come around about other things as well. Eventually.
It is a pity that many people have to experience something for themselves before they can understand it.
He can just take another 8 months off and come back and win everything like before
Haha true He has his best years after a hiatus
Aye... the snowball Stan started seems to be turning into a (small) avalanche