Ok I'm back from hitting with the K7. Strung with Wilson nat gut/Gamma io poly.
I believe this is gonna be a very successful frame. It has pretty much everything you want in a tennis racquet and very few downsides. I don't know where to start but the thing that surprised me most was the huge spin potential. I don't remember playing with a frame that had so much kick. I could see the ball jumping up a whole lot more than I'm used to when it hit the ground on the other side. A couple balls I thought were gonna be long just dropped abruptly inside the court. Anyone looking for free spin will love it.
The power was much better than I had anticipated. Kevlar absorb the impact and usually this means it'll be underpowered. Not here. The power was much higher than a comparable frame of similar SW. It hits big for a sub 12oz frame. I demoed a Dr98 not long ago and this has more power by a good margin. Sweet spot felt generous and off center hits had still decent pop. Very good frame on defense, when just flicking it, you still get decent depth.
Comfort is amazing. It's hard to say compared to other my foam filled Angells, because they all have different specs, but it is really smooth, but it's not the same feeling as foam. It's very muted, it almost felt like my MG Radical MP (58ra) but without being really flexy. Even when hitting very close to the edge of the frame it is never harsh never jarring. Kevlar has that old school feel to it but the stiffness is not so low that it feels noodly at all. It's like Countervail but better. Very hard to describe, I hope others can come up with something better, but it's like all the bad vibes are out yet you still have a good feel for the ball.
At net it was quite stable. It's not as good as my 350sw TC97 or my Ultra Tour of course. But again this is not a heavy frame. However, if you don't play against hard hitters, it has more than enough stability. It also has the agility compensate for the lack of mass. However I'm sure a couple lead strips would make a good difference.
I didn't bring my radar, but it serve really well. Again the huge spin was there to help on the serve too. I will need more testing but on first impressions I believe many will like how it serves. There was a lot of action on the ball that's for sure.
The precision was ok, I didn't do any special testing but it didn't have the pin point accuracy of my TC97 18m (but what does?). Of course, I've been playing for over a year with my TC97s and I'm more dialed in with them. But the launch angle is lower than the TC100 and comparable to the TC95 63ra. Not sure if this is the frame or my string choice, but for such a spin friendly frame it has very good control.
Final thoughts after only 1hour of play, this is a frame I believe many many people will love. Power and spin are up there with the best, stability is not bad at all and control is above average. I don't know of any frame that has this much power and spin in such a comfortable package without compromising on maneuverability. It feels like the son of a Pure Drive and a MG Radical Mp. Next step for me will be to add lead, I need at least 340SW otherwise I tend to overhit, but with such a great platform I have many options, my intention is to add couple grams at 2 and 10 to pump up the TW and SW slightly and maybe a leather grip later on because I prefer leather to synthetic.
Awesome job by Paul. Makes me wonder, why did companies dropped Kevlar-Twaron? Cost cutting maybe?