Nadal_Freak
Banned
VAMOS RAFA! Winning despite not playing your best tennis. Can't wait until clay season where everyone will be slipping and sliding except Rafa.
I also appreciate your comments on Kosovo.Glad not everyone here is blinded by American propaganda.
People who say Tsonga had Nadal on his kness don't understand the excitement of watching Nadal play. MANY players have had RAfa on his knees - I've seen this situation so often with him - but its the fight back that makes him outstanding and the most incredible tennis player - he so reminds me of Borg
It is ok to be American and to question their decisions, ignorance and arrogance. I hate that whole, "well if you ain't with us then you're with the terrorists and communists" garbage. That's a line to trick dumb people into agreeing and conforming with everything the government says and does. Having a mind of your own and questioning bad decisions is the most patriotic and sensible thing any citizen of a country can and should do.
No problem. I'm with you on this. Your country got robbed.
Word!!
Back to the topic:
The question is, can Nadal finally beat Blake? It's his best chance on a hardcourt. It's now or never, imo. I doubt, he'll meet him on clay or grass anytime soon.
Well, guess the Red Wings and Pistons/Cavs take precedence, eh?
A great win for Nadal, especially after being embarassed by Tsonga at the AO.
I do agree with those who say that Tsonga has way more weapons and a much better overall game than Blake. Tsonga is GS material, Blake isn't. Thus, it seems like if Nadal's playing well enough to beat Tsonga, he's playing well enough to beat Blake. Then again, Blake has a good record vs. Nadal on HC, although this is a slower higher-bouncing HC.
so he purposely lets his opponents get him down like that so he can show off at how well he can come back in *a lot* (not all) cases? dude, this was just the Pacific Life Open. Tsonga's ability/confidence did not let him down in the QUARTERFINALS of a GRAND SLAM.
i admire Nadal for his fighting spirit. I LOVE him for keeping the French away from Federer. But it wasn't at all exciting to watch Nadal "come back" from 2-5 in the 3rd set. Tsonga mostly gave the match away due to his nerves.
How ridiculous to assume that Nadal does this on purpose - ok I agree Tsonga is a good player but don't make excuses for his loss - this is the guy who beat Nadal in AO - so don't tell me it was nerves!!
Nadal will have to play well to win, and Tsonga will have to play poorly to lose.
this will be (another) huge confidence builder if Tsonga wins...
and yet another very disappointing win for Nadal.
Would you care to elaborate?
Can you define "crushed"? Down and not trying to win, or just upset about the loss? Afraid to play him in the future? :|he still IS crushed from being dominated by this upstart, Tsonga, in the QF of a GRAND SLAM.
yeah, i was speaking hypothetically - this was while the match was still going on.
if nadal loses he would have been crushed...he still IS crushed from being dominated by this upstart, Tsonga, in the QF of a GRAND SLAM.
if Tsonga had won, which he showed he could have done quite handily again, he would have built even more confidence.
obviously that didn't happen, but the fact remains that tsonga CRUSHED nadal in the QF of the AO2008. Nadal BARELY squeaked by to beat Tsonga.....a very small revenge for what Tsonga took away from him at the AO2008-
Tsonga goes 5-2 up!!!. the end is nigh Nadal fans!! lol
Lol it's funny how people keep quoting me when at that moment in time no-one can disagree that it was an acurate statement, Nadal didn't win the match!!..Tsonga lost it, as i mentioned before in the very next set Jo didn't seem remotely bothered with challenging Nadal's serve to win the match and was more concerned about serving it out, Rafa's meant to be number two in the world and yet he was hanging on for dear life!!, Jo had more than enough chances to win that match and only has himself to blame, but he's certainly still as talented as anyone on the tour.
Rafa's number 2 in the world because he always holds on for dear life. Even on day when he was not playing his best or on his best surface, Rafa came away with the "w". It doesn't matter how it happened, just that it happened. I think Tsonga is a tremendous talent but let's see him win a few titles (big ones) first and don't forget he's older than Rafa.
Uh no. Nadal won the match, Tsonga lost. Remember that. If Tsonga won he wouldn't be on that plane to Miami right now instead of playing Blake tonight. Nadal won in 3 sets, denial isn't just a river in Egypt. What you didn't realize was the end was near for Tsonga too.
It's funny but even I tend to forget that. Tsonga is older than Nadal. Shows you how much Nadal has done and is still doing. He's way ahead of his time. DY is 18-19 and miles behind in pretty much every department from Nadal, who's only a couple of years older.
It does not matter HOW it happened-just that it did happen. Tsonga lost. Whether he gave it away or Rafa took it away is immaterial. That's why they call it "playing" and not "winning".
But it wasn't convincing and was very lucky, most people would agree that Jo SHOULD have won the match and let himself down, in my opinion it was Jo's sloppy play more than Rafa's ability that won the match and i'm sure many would concur.
Could anyone look at that match and imply that Rafa is any better than Jo?.. i certainly couldn't see that evidence despite the rankings.
Try understanding the concept before making idle comments, of course Nadal won the match but there can be no doubt that jo handed it to him, he messed up on the tie breaker in the second set and messed up when 5-2 up and serving for the match in the 3rd, thus he gave the match away that cannot be disputed.
Nadal is three years older than Donald and he certainly didn't look "miles ahead" in the second set when they played, three years more in development was always gonna tell but only a hater would claim Donald didn't give Rafa a tough time in many stages of that match,
And also Tsonga is only one year older than Rafa and has played less because of injuries!!, so that's hardly a big difference in age.
Lol it's funny how people keep quoting me when at that moment in time no-one can disagree that it was an acurate statement, Nadal didn't win the match!!..Tsonga lost it, as i mentioned before in the very next set Jo didn't seem remotely bothered with challenging Nadal's serve to win the match and was more concerned about serving it out, Rafa's meant to be number two in the world and yet he was hanging on for dear life!!, Jo had more than enough chances to win that match and only has himself to blame, but he's certainly still as talented as anyone on the tour.
I just came back from the ATP site. Man I looked forever but I couldn't find the column that said "should have won". They only have those stupid old win and lose ones. The thing is that, yes I'm happy rafa won, but if he had lost then I would be gracious enough to admit that tsonga beat him and deserved it. Tsonga is a great player and it's nice to have a new face on the tour who can win (like the djoker) but love him or hate him, Rafa is a great 3 time GS champion who is going to try and win by any means necessary.
Is it not possible for someone to be extremely lucky now? :-? , "deserved" would have seen Rafa show true class and not have to rely on Jo messing up, but that simply wasn't the case, he was very lucky and many have suggested so, you have to look at the situation realistically and see that Jo was 5-2 up and until then was consistantly serving well, couple that with the silly double faults he made to go 6-5 down and the picture becomes clear.
I understood very well your "concept". You refused to accept that Nadal won and that Tsonga lost so you say things like "oh, Nadal didn't win, Tsonga gave it away." that. Tsonga didn't give anything away, Nadal stayed tough and took it as only he can. But your point in that post was to not give Nadal any credit and just s!ag Tsonga off at all costs for not beating a player you dislike in Nadal. Yep, I understood it well.
Not miles ahead? Nadal won his first slam at 18 and beat Federer in the process. DY is still trying to get 2 wins in a row on a regular basis. I see your type all the time, the angry type who refuses to give credit to Nadal simply because you hate the guy. It's fine, vent your anger. But you still look stupid in the process.
The talented Tsonga has ZERO titles and Nadal has 23 titles, 3 slams and 9 Masters. So WHO won the match huh?
Not miles ahead? Nadal won his first slam at 18 and beat Federer in the process. DY is still trying to get 2 wins in a row on a regular basis. I see your type all the time, the angry type who refuses to give credit to Nadal simply because you hate the guy. It's fine, vent your anger. But you still look stupid in the process.
They quote you because:
1-You were wrong.
2-You were not graceful saying it.
And yes, Nadal won the match. It´s not a coincidence that he usually wins in close matches. He is well known for his mental strength.
Nadal wasted more break point chances than Tsonga during the match so he could have won earlier if he had taken those chances (he was leading 3-1 in the 1st set tie-break and lost it, had set point at 6-5 in the 2nd set but it went to the tie-break, had some break point chances early in the 3rd set and missed them) and he kept fighting to win 5 games in a row. Nadal totally deserved the win.
Jo was 5-2 up and until then was consistantly serving well, couple that with the silly double faults he made to go 6-5 down and the picture becomes clear.
Nadal pulled ahead in the third set because he began to 'play' more and he is very good at the mental part of tennis, which allowed him to pull ahead and make a huge comeback. Kudos to both players. Just my take on the match.
Edit: Some of this I got from Benhur's post on another thread, which I agree with...