Peter Bodo 2018 Predictions Essay: Novak will return to No. 1

every7

Hall of Fame
Peter Bodo is one of my favourite tennis essayists, so his annual off-season prediction article about tennis in the new year is always required reading for me.

He always has a few strange ideas because his predictions are so "out there" but the majority of his predictions are freakishly accurate despite seeming unlikely.

Here's the list for 2018 (with apologies to the Bodo haters out there - I know a lot of people don't like this guy lol)

** NOTE: Emojis in brackets are my additions and not the author

Crystal tennis ball says 2018 will be year of disruption
22 Nov, 2017
Peter Bodo

Here are five predictions for the coming year:

Grand Slams will produce four different champions ( :eek: )

Federer and Nadal divvied up the four major titles in 2017, but that's unlikely to happen again.

Face it, Federer is 36. He has a history of back trouble, which forced him to alter his schedule and pull out of a number of events this year. He'll take good care of himself, limit his appearances and have a few great runs (Wimbledon, anyone?). But the consistency he had in 2017 will be impossible to maintain.

With the elite ranks back at full strength and legitimate new major contenders emerging, it's hard to see Federer and Nadal repeating their exploits in 2018.

Murray will struggle ( :mad: )

Andy Murray is at a critical crossroads. Years of effort and frustration finally bore fruit in his remarkable 2016 season, when he locked down the year-end No.1 ranking in the final match of the ATP year. It had the feel of a career-capping performance.

Also, Murray is a two-time Wimbledon champ and two-time Olympic singles gold medalist. The 30-year-old Scot already is on the short list for being the greatest British athlete of all time. All of which suggests he might be done with the heavy lifting in his career. Another hint: He recently parted ways with the coach who engineered his greatest triumphs, Ivan Lendl.

Disrupters will threaten the status quo ( :eek: )

Goffin, who turns 27 in December, might not have enough weapons to win a Grand Slam in 2018, but he has shown that he can disrupt any draw. He and a number of other players in their mid-20s will make life very difficult for the marquee names, especially if the Grand Slams decide to cut back to 16 seeds (from the present 32).

Dimitrov, Jack Sock, Dominic Thiem, Kei Nishikori, Milos Raonic and others have all been held back by the Big Four and Stan Wawrinka. All of them have improved while patiently awaiting their turn.

Nishikori and Raonic, both Grand Slam finalists, missed a lot of tennis at the end of the year due to injuries. Expect both of them to mount a big push. Thiem, Alexander Zverev, Lucas Pouille and Nick Kyrgios are all 24 or under.

Djokovic will earn back the No. 1 ranking

If the Grand Slam titles are distributed among three or more players, consistency will be the key to becoming No. 1. Novak Djokovic, who's 30, knows what that takes. He might not even have to hit the stratospheric level of play that he tapped into in 2015 in order to fight back to the top.

Djokovic pulled the plug on 2017 during Wimbledon and ended the season at No. 12. He was mired in a slump and suffering from an elbow injury. It was the culmination of a period when he struggled with personal and motivational issues, as well as athletic setbacks. Djokovic will get plenty of help from someone who knows what he has been going through -- his coach and friend Andre Agassi.

Zverev will crack the Grand Slam code ( :eek: )

OK, it's ridiculous to criticize a 20-year-old who already is ranked No. 4 in the world and has won two Masters events (Rome and Montreal) with final-round wins over Djokovic and Federer. But Zverev had trouble hitting the high notes at the majors. His fourth-round loss at Wimbledon was his best effort; he lost in the first round at the French Open and won just one match while seeded No. 4 at the US Open.

You can bet Zverev and his team are disappointed and looking at the upcoming year's schedule with different perspectives. His rate of progress suggests that 2018 will be his Grand Slam breakthrough year.
 

TripleATeam

G.O.A.T.
2017 Predictions (2/5):
  • Federer #18.
  • Murray #1 consolidated.
  • 3 new M1000 winners.
  • Becker goes back to coaching.
  • Nadal only Spaniard in YE top 20.
2016 Predictions (2/5):
  • Andy Murray won't win a major.
  • Djokovic will win 3 out of 5 big titles.
  • Nadal is less likely to win a major than Fed.
  • Serena will be #1 at the end of the year.
  • Venus will be in the top 10 at the end of the year.
I don't exactly see how he's freakishly accurate.
 

Gary Duane

G.O.A.T.
2017 Predictions (2/5):
  • Federer #18.
  • Murray #1 consolidated.
  • 3 new M1000 winners.
  • Becker goes back to coaching.
  • Nadal only Spaniard in YE top 20.
2016 Predictions (2/5):
  • Andy Murray won't win a major.
  • Djokovic will win 3 out of 5 big titles.
  • Nadal is less likely to win a major than Fed.
  • Serena will be #1 at the end of the year.
  • Venus will be in the top 10 at the end of the year.
I don't exactly see how he's freakishly accurate.
You can get as much accuracy from an astrology site! :D
 

cc0509

Talk Tennis Guru
Bodo's "predictions" have been as accurate as astrology fanatics Fiji and Bertie B which means most of his predictions have been like throwing darts in a dark room. :rolleyes:

I do agree with him that Zverev can only improve and hopefully, he can crack the slam code in 2018. As for what else may happen in 2018, I have absolutely no idea.
 

Mugu

Rookie
Peter Bodo is one of my favourite tennis essayists, so his annual off-season prediction article about tennis in the new year is always required reading for me.

Djokovic will earn back the No. 1 ranking

If the Grand Slam titles are distributed among three or more players, consistency will be the key to becoming No. 1. Novak Djokovic, who's 30, knows what that takes. He might not even have to hit the stratospheric level of play that he tapped into in 2015 in order to fight back to the top.

Djokovic pulled the plug on 2017 during Wimbledon and ended the season at No. 12. He was mired in a slump and suffering from an elbow injury. It was the culmination of a period when he struggled with personal and motivational issues, as well as athletic setbacks. Djokovic will get plenty of help from someone who knows what he has been going through -- his coach and friend Andre Agassi.
i love mr. bodo as well. must strongly disagree with the joker prediction. this is another thing that Federer has spoiled us all with. great player has setback, and comes around to rule the game again. he makes everything in tennis look easy and inevitable, including coming back from injury. i just
think Djokovic isn't going to have that fairy tale scenario next year, and he will struggle a bit. no number 1 for him in 2018...
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Peter Bodo is one of my favourite tennis essayists, so his annual off-season prediction article about tennis in the new year is always required reading for me.

He always has a few strange ideas because his predictions are so "out there" but the majority of his predictions are freakishly accurate despite seeming unlikely.

Here's the list for 2018 (with apologies to the Bodo haters out there - I know a lot of people don't like this guy lol)

** NOTE: Emojis in brackets are my additions and not the author

Crystal tennis ball says 2018 will be year of disruption
22 Nov, 2017
Peter Bodo

Here are five predictions for the coming year:

Grand Slams will produce four different champions ( :eek: )

Federer and Nadal divvied up the four major titles in 2017, but that's unlikely to happen again.

Face it, Federer is 36. He has a history of back trouble, which forced him to alter his schedule and pull out of a number of events this year. He'll take good care of himself, limit his appearances and have a few great runs (Wimbledon, anyone?). But the consistency he had in 2017 will be impossible to maintain.

With the elite ranks back at full strength and legitimate new major contenders emerging, it's hard to see Federer and Nadal repeating their exploits in 2018.

Murray will struggle ( :mad: )

Andy Murray is at a critical crossroads. Years of effort and frustration finally bore fruit in his remarkable 2016 season, when he locked down the year-end No.1 ranking in the final match of the ATP year. It had the feel of a career-capping performance.

Also, Murray is a two-time Wimbledon champ and two-time Olympic singles gold medalist. The 30-year-old Scot already is on the short list for being the greatest British athlete of all time. All of which suggests he might be done with the heavy lifting in his career. Another hint: He recently parted ways with the coach who engineered his greatest triumphs, Ivan Lendl.

Disrupters will threaten the status quo ( :eek: )

Goffin, who turns 27 in December, might not have enough weapons to win a Grand Slam in 2018, but he has shown that he can disrupt any draw. He and a number of other players in their mid-20s will make life very difficult for the marquee names, especially if the Grand Slams decide to cut back to 16 seeds (from the present 32).

Dimitrov, Jack Sock, Dominic Thiem, Kei Nishikori, Milos Raonic and others have all been held back by the Big Four and Stan Wawrinka. All of them have improved while patiently awaiting their turn.

Nishikori and Raonic, both Grand Slam finalists, missed a lot of tennis at the end of the year due to injuries. Expect both of them to mount a big push. Thiem, Alexander Zverev, Lucas Pouille and Nick Kyrgios are all 24 or under.

Djokovic will earn back the No. 1 ranking

If the Grand Slam titles are distributed among three or more players, consistency will be the key to becoming No. 1. Novak Djokovic, who's 30, knows what that takes. He might not even have to hit the stratospheric level of play that he tapped into in 2015 in order to fight back to the top.

Djokovic pulled the plug on 2017 during Wimbledon and ended the season at No. 12. He was mired in a slump and suffering from an elbow injury. It was the culmination of a period when he struggled with personal and motivational issues, as well as athletic setbacks. Djokovic will get plenty of help from someone who knows what he has been going through -- his coach and friend Andre Agassi.

Zverev will crack the Grand Slam code ( :eek: )

OK, it's ridiculous to criticize a 20-year-old who already is ranked No. 4 in the world and has won two Masters events (Rome and Montreal) with final-round wins over Djokovic and Federer. But Zverev had trouble hitting the high notes at the majors. His fourth-round loss at Wimbledon was his best effort; he lost in the first round at the French Open and won just one match while seeded No. 4 at the US Open.

You can bet Zverev and his team are disappointed and looking at the upcoming year's schedule with different perspectives. His rate of progress suggests that 2018 will be his Grand Slam breakthrough year.
So no mention of the current #1 and King of Clay. Bodo is ................. Fill in the blank.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
but the majority of his predictions are freakishly accurate despite seeming unlikely.
Remind me of any accurate prediction Bodo has ever made. I have had to tweet Bodo many times to correct basic facts that he's got wrong. On one occasion, he said Djokovic has 14 slams. Anyone who writes about tennis should know off the top of his head how many slams each of the top 4 have.
 

every7

Hall of Fame
So no mention of the current #1 and King of Clay. Bodo is ................. Fill in the blank.

Remind me of any accurate prediction Bodo has ever made. I have had to tweet Bodo many times to correct basic facts that he's got wrong. On one occasion, he said Djokovic has 14 slams. Anyone who writes about tennis should know off the top of his head how many slams each of the top 4 have.

He predicted the resurgence of Federer and also that there would be a lot of Masters 1000 breakthroughs this year which no one else really saw coming.

You're right, though, he has made some big-time blunders for sure. He takes risks and puts himself out there.

That's a bad mistake about Djokovic having 14 slams :eek: Where did he write that?

i love mr. bodo as well. must strongly disagree with the joker prediction. this is another thing that Federer has spoiled us all with. great player has setback, and comes around to rule the game again. he makes everything in tennis look easy and inevitable, including coming back from injury. i just
think Djokovic isn't going to have that fairy tale scenario next year, and he will struggle a bit. no number 1 for him in 2018...

Agree at the moment it looks like almost an impossible prediction.

I am seeing some interesting footages of Djokovic at the moment in training, though. It does look like he is getting back to good levels.
 

Roddick85

Hall of Fame
Grand Slams will produce four different champions ( :eek: )
I think this is quite likely too. I just don't see Fedal dividing the slams again next year with a full and hopefully healthy roster.
Nadal will be the main threat at the FO, Federer at Wimbledon, which is extremely obvious at this point. I could see them defending their titles though.
On hard, the competition is a lot stronger, perhaps Djokovic or Wawrinka/Dimitrov to split the rest?

Murray will struggle ( :mad: )
Have to agree with Bodo there, I think Murray will struggle a lot next year. The kind of injury he's had to deal with is career threatening. If he does return, I expect a 2014 like kind of return for him if he's healthy, probably a bit worst since he's 3 years older.

Disrupters will threaten the status quo ( :eek: )
Will they? Not so convinced. The only way I see emerging players threatening the established order is if the top guys aren't healthy enough to compete, sort of like what happened in 2017.

Djokovic will earn back the No. 1 ranking
If he returns with the right mind set, it could happen. However, I always say, #1 ranking is a young man's game. Novak will be 31 next year, so he'll have to be smart at scheduling. His days of dominating the entire field for extended periods of time are pretty much behind him at this point. But then again, outside of the established order, who could be consistent enough to be #1? Tricky question. I think the days of long reigning #1 who have a huge lead in the race will soon be over. The next #1 will have less points, and the #1 player will likely fluctuate more.

Zverev will crack the Grand Slam code ( :eek: )
He's got to work on his fitness and more importantly, that damn cry baby attitude. His game needs a lot of work too, he's got a great backhand but terrible forehand and the serve, for his height is weak, let's not talk about his net game. Until he fixes a couple of things, I'm off the Zverev bandwagon.
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
His predictions are all completely understandable and reasonable, with the exception of Zverev winning a slam. If Djokovic or Murray come back to even 90% of their form, they would handle him in a major. Now, BO3 matches are another matter.

I just see no evidence that Zverev is physically strong enough to win seven matches in a B05 setting. I am totally unimpressed with this stamina. I think even Novak right now (coming back from injury and not playing tennis for 4 months) would effortlessly outlast Zverev if they played a practice match of 3 hours. Put them on court right now and I bet anything that's what would happen.
 

Zebrev

Hall of Fame
He'd right about number 5. Zverev will make a break through at the slams. The big five are all over thirty, there are plenty of opportunities open to a young player like him.
 

every7

Hall of Fame
I think this is quite likely too. I just don't see Fedal dividing the slams again next year with a full and hopefully healthy roster.
Nadal will be the main threat at the FO, Federer at Wimbledon, which is extremely obvious at this point. I could see them defending their titles though.
On hard, the competition is a lot stronger, perhaps Djokovic or Wawrinka/Dimitrov to split the rest?


Have to agree with Bodo there, I think Murray will struggle a lot next year. The kind of injury he's had to deal with is career threatening. If he does return, I expect a 2014 like kind of return for him if he's healthy, probably a bit worst since he's 3 years older.


Will they? Not so convinced. The only way I see emerging players threatening the established order is if the top guys aren't healthy enough to compete, sort of like what happened in 2017.


If he returns with the right mind set, it could happen. However, I always say, #1 ranking is a young man's game. Novak will be 31 next year, so he'll have to be smart at scheduling. His days of dominating the entire field for extended periods of time are pretty much behind him at this point. But then again, outside of the established order, who could be consistent enough to be #1? Tricky question. I think the days of long reigning #1 who have a huge lead in the race will soon be over. The next #1 will have less points, and the #1 player will likely fluctuate more.


He's got to work on his fitness and more importantly, that damn cry baby attitude. His game needs a lot of work too, he's got a great backhand but terrible forehand and the serve, for his height is weak, let's not talk about his net game. Until he fixes a couple of things, I'm off the Zverev bandwagon.

Very interesting remarks. This guy Zverev I noticed what you said as well. He has had some problem with maybe not respecting an opponent and what you mentioned as "crybaby attitude". I agree he will need to fix that. In some ways it is good if he is fearless against the big guys, but also the arrogance creates problems if "expects" to win and things get tough (best of 5 sets is this problem).

Do you have any other ideas about potentially weird or surprising things that people might not think of that could happen next year? Always interested on your comments in this area.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Great point. Anyone who predicted in late 2016 that Fed and Rafa would split the slams would have been labelled insane.
That would have been insane because we are talking about the 2 greatest players in the history of the game. Form is temporary, class is permanent. I had no doubts whatsoever that once Rafa was fit again, the ball would be in his court.
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
That would have been insane because we are talking about the 2 greatest players in the history of the game. Form is temporary, class is permanent. I had no doubts whatsoever that once Rafa was fit again, the ball would be in his court.
Great... one of 'em was 35 years old in late 2016. Anyone who would predict Fed would win 2 slams would be insane in predicting it. If the axiom "form is temporary, but class is permanent," then why isn't Laver still winning slams? How about Borg? Both were the epitome of class. In fact, what about that damn Edberg? So what if he's 51, class is "permanent," according to your thesis. ;)

Based on this, I'm sure you're predictions for slams in 2018 are:

AO: Edberg
FO: Borg
Wimbledon: Stan Smith
USO: Laver

Remember: "form is temporary, class is permanent." Can't wait to see Bjorn back on court winning next year!
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Great... one of 'em was 35 years old in late 2016. Anyone who would predict Fed would win 2 slams would be insane in predicting it. If the axiom "form is temporary, but class is permanent," then why isn't Laver still winning slams? How about Borg? Both were the epitome of class. In fact, what about that damn Edberg? So what if he's 51, class is "permanent," according to your thesis. ;)

Based on this, I'm sure you're predictions for slams in 2018 are:

AO: Edberg
FO: Borg
Wimbledon: Stan Smith
USO: Laver

Remember: "form is temporary, class is permanent." Can't wait to see Bjorn back on court winning next year!
So you are saying that Federer is over the hill and is deluded thinking he can still win slams? Federer is still winning so why should he retire just because of his age? Athletes usually retire when they lose the will to compete, lose the will to travel endlessly for the most part of the year, because they want to go off and do something else or because there is nothing else they want to achieve. Retirement is not just based on age.
 

merlinpinpin

Hall of Fame
Great... one of 'em was 35 years old in late 2016. Anyone who would predict Fed would win 2 slams would be insane in predicting it. If the axiom "form is temporary, but class is permanent," then why isn't Laver still winning slams? How about Borg? Both were the epitome of class. In fact, what about that damn Edberg? So what if he's 51, class is "permanent," according to your thesis. ;)

Based on this, I'm sure you're predictions for slams in 2018 are:

AO: Edberg
FO: Borg
Wimbledon: Stan Smith
USO: Laver

Remember: "form is temporary, class is permanent." Can't wait to see Bjorn back on court winning next year!

Stan Smith at Wimbledon? Are you serious? :eek:

Will Renshaw all the way!
 

SQA333

Hall of Fame
2017 Predictions (2/5):
  • Federer #18.
  • Murray #1 consolidated.
  • 3 new M1000 winners.
  • Becker goes back to coaching.
  • Nadal only Spaniard in YE top 20.
2016 Predictions (2/5):
  • Andy Murray won't win a major.
  • Djokovic will win 3 out of 5 big titles.
  • Nadal is less likely to win a major than Fed.
  • Serena will be #1 at the end of the year.
  • Venus will be in the top 10 at the end of the year.
I don't exactly see how he's freakishly accurate.

To me, he's like McEnroe. Over-opinionated; talks (or writes) out of his rear end.

His predictions show that he has just as much innate tennis knowledge as around 40% of the posters here.
 

Roddick85

Hall of Fame
Very interesting remarks. This guy Zverev I noticed what you said as well. He has had some problem with maybe not respecting an opponent and what you mentioned as "crybaby attitude". I agree he will need to fix that. In some ways it is good if he is fearless against the big guys, but also the arrogance creates problems if "expects" to win and things get tough (best of 5 sets is this problem).

Do you have any other ideas about potentially weird or surprising things that people might not think of that could happen next year? Always interested on your comments in this area.

I think Zverev is a bit overhyped/overrated for many reasons. A lot of promises came with these 2 MS-1000 titles. I don't want to take anything away from him because he doesn't control who's on the other side of the net, but beating an exhausted and uninspired Djokovic who had to play 2 matches in 24 hours in Rome and a limping Federer with an injured back in Montreal, it's worth wondering how meaningful these titles really were? Zverev has a lot of potential, but he's still got a lot of work left to do as far as his game goes and even more between the ears. I can't help but feel the tennis community in general is too excited about him, and a lot of this has to do with the disappointment that was the "Lost Generation" who failed to do anything, people want new players to step up and become icons. A lot of hope was put on Kyrgios/Tomic, but these 2 aren't invested in the sport. Then you have Zverev who shows up, seems to have a decent head on his shoulder and genuinely likes tennis, has talents and wants to improve. People who were craving for someone new immediately jumped on him.

My predictions for 2017?

I think that as much as 2017 was the year of "Fedal", 2018 will serve as a reality check and this will disappoint a lot of people. People rave about Federer's incredible year from a title stand point and while incredible, it had it's bad moments too which everyone forgets. I still feel concerned that after skipping the entire clay season and playing the grass season which is short, then having another break after Wimbledon, his back broke down for what, 6 weeks? He only recovered by the time the Laver Cup started, had a nice run in Shanghai and was already showing signs of exhaustion in Basel which lead to his surprising exit at the WTF against Goffin. I don't expect 2018 to be better for him physically, it sucks but yeah he's aging like everyone. I think the same can be said about Nadal, at the end of the season, he was already breaking down physically, like he typically does after a strong season. In theory, competition should be stronger in 2018, so I think "Fedal" are in for a brutal awakening.

I think it's virtually impossible to really predict how all these returning injured players will do because injuries can change a player drastically. If I had to pick a player who I think, can have a somewhat successful comeback, it's Djokovic.
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
Murray will struggle is not even a prediction. Murray always struggles.
Now come on... :oops: He made it to the #1 ranking. I think he "struggled" because he came of age in the Fed/Nadal/Djoker era and he was never remotely as good as any of 'em. But he still was a great player who achieved something only a tiny handful of guys have ever achieved: top man in his chosen sport.
tumblr_mh7gquXEFH1ql5bibo1_500.gif
 

junior74

Talk Tennis Guru
Now come on... :oops: He made it to the #1 ranking. I think he "struggled" because he came of age in the Fed/Nadal/Djoker era and he was never remotely as good as any of 'em. But he still was a great player who achieved something only a tiny handful of guys have ever achieved: top man in his chosen sport.
tumblr_mh7gquXEFH1ql5bibo1_500.gif

I think The Struggle is a forever ongoing thing that I appreciate a lot :)

He struggles through The Struggle very often.
 

every7

Hall of Fame
All predictions are fluke. Don't take any credit for random guesses that just happened to turn out.

Of course. This is obvious. But no one was mentioning taking credit. So why did you bring this up? To stir angers or conflict? Do it elsewhere please....
 

Tennisanity

Legend
Of course. This is obvious. But no one was mentioning taking credit. So why did you bring this up? To stir angers or conflict? Do it elsewhere please....

This is credit:

but the majority of his predictions are freakishly accurate despite seeming unlikely.

First off they aren't that accurate, and even if they are there is nothing freakish about random guesses.
 

every7

Hall of Fame
This is credit:



First off they aren't that accurate, and even if they are there is nothing freakish about random guesses.

You suggested people were TAKING credit. And that's not what was happening. Please don't stir trouble. Take this bickerings elsewhere.
 

every7

Hall of Fame
You gave credit to bodo by saying he's freakishly accurate. He's not.

You suggested people were TAKING credit! That did not happen. There is a distinction between giving and taking credit.

I have pointed out what you said was not in the discussions and now you are distorting to a different topics to extend unnecessary conflicts. Very bad.
 

Tennisanity

Legend
You suggested people were TAKING credit! That did not happen. There is a distinction between giving and taking credit.

I have pointed out what you said was not in the discussions and now you are distorting to a different topics to extend unnecessary conflicts. Very bad.

LOL, if that's what you're focused on then you sorely missed the point of my post. Take, give, it doesn't matter, the point is there is no place for credit whatsoever with predictions. LOL, some people are so ridiculous.
 

every7

Hall of Fame
LOL, if that's what you're focused on then you sorely missed the point of my post. Take, give, it doesn't matter, the point is there is no place for credit whatsoever with predictions. LOL, some people are so ridiculous.

I'm sorry but you missed the point of the whole thread. And then you posted something which, I believe, was just to create a silly point of difference (was it not?). I think your intention was to stir troubles. And even then you were still wrong in that you claimed something that simply wasn't there. You created unnecessary extra posts and derailed the thread. You created extra comments and just meaningless drivel all for small-minded reasons.
 

Tennisanity

Legend
You missed the point of the whole thread. And it was all just to create a silly point of difference. I think your intention was to stir troubles. And even then you were still wrong in that you claimed something that simply wasn't there. You created unnecessary extra posts and derailed the thread.

There is no place for the phrase 'freakishly accurate' with predictions. You are just plain wrong.
 
Nadal massive favourite for AO (neither Nishikori or Djokovic are likely to be match tight by then to challenge) and FO.

Wimbledon is where Djokovic will return to the big time. USO will be time for Nishikori to right the wrong of 2014.

While I think Nadal will get two Majors I think Djokovic will reclaim the no.1 ranking as over BO3 format he is the most complete across all the surfaces nowadays.
 

every7

Hall of Fame
Nadal massive favourite for AO (neither Nishikori or Djokovic are likely to be match tight by then to challenge) and FO.

Wimbledon is where Djokovic will return to the big time. USO will be time for Nishikori to right the wrong of 2014.

While I think Nadal will get two Majors I think Djokovic will reclaim the no.1 ranking as over BO3 format he is the most complete across all the surfaces nowadays.

Very interesting projections. Would be fascinating if Djokovic could recapture his best level starting with Wimbledon like he did a few years ago winning Wimbledon in 2014 going into 2015.

Do you think if the courts are fast at AO like this year Federer will have a good chance? He would be my favourite next year if the courts stay fast.
 

guanzishou

G.O.A.T.
Bodo means idiot in Bahasa language....so go figure.

Bodoh isn't it ?

Actually the is no such thing as "Bahasa Language". Bahasa means Language. The correct term is "Indonesian Language".

Indonesian Language = Bahasa Indonesia.

Stupid in Indonesian language is "Bodoh" (no silent H).

Stupid in Javanese language is "Bodo" (no H at all in the spelling and pronunciation).

Javanese is just one ethnic language out of thousands other ethnic languages in Indonesia.

So there is Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian Language) and there is Basa Jawa (Javanese Language).

Indonesians will find it funny or strange if you say Bahasa Language (literally means Language language).
 

Druss

Hall of Fame
Actually the is no such thing as "Bahasa Language". Bahasa means Language. The correct term is "Indonesian Language".

Indonesian Language = Bahasa Indonesia.

Stupid in Indonesian language is "Bodoh" (no silent H).

Stupid in Javanese language is "Bodo" (no H at all in the spelling and pronunciation).

Javanese is just one ethnic language out of thousands other ethnic languages in Indonesia.

So there is Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian Language) and there is Basa Jawa (Javanese Language).

Indonesians will find it funny or strange if you say Bahasa Language (literally means Language language).

I’ve traveled a few times to Indonesia and I have repeatedly been asked by the locals there, “do you speak Bahasa?” If it is as you say, i guess I should have said Bahasa Indo or Javanese even better. At the end of the day, Bodo is still an idiot.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
31 seems to be a good year for returning to no.1. Federer and Nadal have both done it, so it's Djokovic's time.
 

guanzishou

G.O.A.T.
I’ve traveled a few times to Indonesia and I have repeatedly been asked by the locals there, “do you speak Bahasa?” If it is as you say, i guess I should have said Bahasa Indo or Javanese even better. At the end of the day, Bodo is still an idiot.
Hmm, interesting. That's probably because a lot of westerners who visit Indonesia would say to the locals "I don't speak Bahasa". Then the locals would use that word to ask the westerners.
 
Top