ROTFL I can't stop laughing

[Azure]

That is his therapy, so you shouldn't laugh at him.

I am merely a spectator.

 

[Tennis_Hands]

I am merely a spectator.

Of course, what else could you be.

 

[Federev]

.

 

[tenisdecente]

The more I read these poor troll threads, the more I miss 90s clay. These morons creating these pathetic threads wont hold a chance against the banned legend of TTW

 

[abmk]

Rofl. In Wimby 15 thread he predicted Fed in 4 aswell.

Djokovic was struggling vs Dimi in Wim 14 (didn't play so well vs Cilic in the QF either). Federer did struggle to some extent vs Stan, but played well vs Raonic in the semi. So Federer was in better form in Wim 14 than Djokovic before the final.

As far as Wim 15 is concerned, Djoko had his struggle vs Anderson and played just well enough to win vs Gasquet in the semi (though he did play great vs Cilic).
Who knew Fed wouldn't be capable of sustaining his level for more than 2 hours or so at the time of Wim 15 final ? He had finished all of matches in short time.

Djokovic raised his level and played his best grass court matches at those times (Wim 14 final and Wim 15 final) to exceed expectations by a great amount.

Let also know how much of egg you had when saying Djoko was going to lose to Fucsovics at this year's USO.

so, yeah, you fail again.

Edit :

For USO 2015 final,

yeah, stan's return position helped fed quite a bit ...

I'd say in the range 60-65 for djokovic and 35-40 for federer ....(if pushed I'd go 60-40 djokovic)

but no doubt, if djokovic doesn't bring his A+ game like he did at the last 2 wimby finals, federer will pounce ..

a lot will depend on fed's disrupting tactics and if he can get into Novak's head a bit ....

https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...final-federer-vs-wawrinka.543390/post-9644786

 

[Deleted member 307496]

The more I read these poor troll threads, the more I miss 90s clay. These morons creating these pathetic threads wont hold a chance against the banned legend of TTW

When I was using the exact same logic as Lew 90's Clay started to get mad on his newest incarnation.

 

[Goosehead]

I'm glad you agree that slams and YECs are more important than masters. As you know, Federer leads in both these categories, slams by quite a margin

Federer didn't bother playing Paris at his peak in 2004-2006. He played Madrid once, which he won. This still doesn't explain why he lost at both in the early rounds in 2015. And with regard to the level of the game increasing, do you actually believe that Ramos-Vinolas was stronger than all of Federer's hardcourt competition in 2004-2006 and that's why he lost?

The whole argument that the level of the tour improved and that's why Federer won less doesn't fly. How can you quantify the level improved? What significant racket advancement or other technological change was made? Is Djokovic better now than 2015 because the tour has moved on?

Federer missed paris in 2004, 2005 with injury.

 

[vex]

In 2007 he beat better players.

Right here is where your logic crashed into a huge wall

 

[DarthKYS]

What a meticulously and carefully crafted post. Perfectly demonstrates the intellect of the poster without any form of bias. Very mature and articulate word choice. I rate this post 10/10

 

[Deleted member 742196]

Absolutely. That was one gem of a postcard

Really, I am enjoying the two of you having this complex relationship. Both of you don't get angry. That's the best part.

Thanks.

I like doggies and I like stotting. Do you know what stotting is? Stotting is jumping upward with all four legs simultaneously. My advice: do not die until you’ve seen a large black poodle stotting in the snow.

I especially like doggiestotting stamps.

The one from the postcard reminded me a little of complex relationships. Like when your neck is bitten and you need to find out how, why, whom or more precisely, what? - in an icy instant.

That is his therapy, so you shouldn't laugh at him.

That is very kind of you to say, I appreciate the gesture.

This Monday my therapist said I should “nix the homocidal maniac”. She didn’t explain it. She just left it hanging, like a brick, like I’m supposed to figure it out.

Any ideas?

I tried Reddit but nothing was there.

 

[Deleted member 688153]

who cares

 

[Deleted member 757377]

Right here is where your logic crashed into a huge wall

Nadal was a better player as Federer himself said in the post-final Wimbledon interview.

Djoko won 2 masters and reached 1 slam final and 2 semi, won AO in january.

Davydenko and Roddick had better results than in 2006 too (won 6 more matches in slams).

 

[Subway Tennis]

is it back on between you two?

It’s called bias and when being biased we don’t think clear.
It’s a lot bias here though from all fanbases.

I would add myself to this list. It took me a long time to appreciate Djokovic's 2011 season because it came at some cost as a Nadal fan. Now i look back on those matches and marvel at the level of tennis that i didn't fully appreciate at the time.

 

[Azure]

Thanks.

I like doggies and I like stotting. Do you know what stotting is? Stotting is jumping upward with all four legs simultaneously. My advice: do not die until you’ve seen a large black poodle stotting in the snow.

I especially like doggiestotting stamps.

The one from the postcard reminded me a little of complex relationships. Like when your neck is bitten and you need to find out how, why, whom or more precisely, what? - in an icy instant.



That is very kind of you to say, I appreciate the gesture.

This Monday my therapist said I should “nix the homocidal maniac”. She didn’t explain it. She just left it hanging, like a brick, like I’m supposed to figure it out.

Any ideas?

I tried Reddit but nothing was there.

There's just something about doggies that are so endearing. I am not sure if Komodos can replicate this. Yesterday I had my neighbour's dog jumping all over me and licking me. I had patted him once....a few days ago. That's it.

 

[OhYes]

@Lew, are you hired by the Djokovic family or do you have a real job?

Wasn't you who made hundreds of Fed videos on youtube and posted them here ?

 

[Tennis_Hands]

Thanks.

I like doggies and I like stotting. Do you know what stotting is? Stotting is jumping upward with all four legs simultaneously. My advice: do not die until you’ve seen a large black poodle stotting in the snow.

I especially like doggiestotting stamps.

The one from the postcard reminded me a little of complex relationships. Like when your neck is bitten and you need to find out how, why, whom or more precisely, what? - in an icy instant.



That is very kind of you to say, I appreciate the gesture.

This Monday my therapist said I should “nix the homocidal maniac”. She didn’t explain it. She just left it hanging, like a brick, like I’m supposed to figure it out.

Any ideas?

I tried Reddit but nothing was there.

I am sure that you put a lot of thought in posts like the above, but I don't read them.

I supposed that you know that, so that is why I suggested that you are writing them so that YOU can read them as a therapy.

You cannot be possibly THAT deluded to think that I will pay attention to them, can you?

 

[TheMaestro1990]

Wasn't you who made hundreds of Fed videos on youtube and posted them here ?

For your information I’ve made several videos of both Djokovic and Nadal, and unlike several other people around here, I can still appreciate their greatness without beating another player down.

 

[AnOctorokForDinner]

Djokovic was struggling vs Dimi in Wim 14 (didn't play so well vs Cilic in the QF either). Federer did struggle to some extent vs Stan, but played well vs Raonic in the semi. So Federer was in better form in Wim 14 than Djokovic before the final.

Sounds strange I imagine, but I thought Dimitrov played really well there, that was (as we see now) his grasscourt peak, which is probably higher than Stan's or Botnic's, so Djok wasn't as poor as it would seem merely from the fact that he struggled.

I mean, it's nice to praise Federer-Davydenko AO 06 while paying no heed to Djokovic-Dimitrov Wim 14 - the comparison popping into my mind because of the exact same scoreline (minus TB scores) - no?

 

[NatF]

Sounds strange I imagine, but I thought Dimitrov played really well there, that was (as we see now) his grasscourt peak, which is probably higher than Stan's or Botnic's, so Djok wasn't as poor as it would seem merely from the fact that he struggled.

I mean, it's nice to praise Federer-Davydenko AO 06 while paying no heed to Djokovic-Dimitrov Wim 14 - the comparison popping into my mind because of the exact same scoreline (minus TB scores) - no?

Yeah Dimitrov won Queens that year and looked very good thrashing a very poor Murray.

I do think Dimitrov played well against Djokovic, but I recall him playing quite badly on the big points so I couldn't say really well. With a better head on his shoulders he may have won that match.

 

[TJfederer16]

(Lew Statman)

 

[AnOctorokForDinner]

Yeah Dimitrov won Queens that year and looked very good thrashing a very poor Murray.

I do think Dimitrov played well against Djokovic, but I recall him playing quite badly on the big points so I couldn't say really well. With a better head on his shoulders he may have won that match.

The same can be said about Denko though. Both had multiple SPs to win another set (Kolya had I think 6 in the 3rd, Grigor 4 in the 4th, both those sets ended 7-6(7) for the winner), both matches could/should have gone to 5 if Dave/Grig were a tad clutcher. Amazing how matches between completely different players can be so similar, though given the total number of matches vs the range of possible scenarios, I guess you can find multiple matches to fit every pattern that's not especially rare.

 

[NatF]

The same can be said about Denko though. Both had multiple SPs to win another set (Kolya had I think 6 in the 3rd, Grigor 4 in the 4th, both those sets ended 7-6(7) for the winner), both matches could/should have gone to 5 if Dave/Grig were a tad clutcher. Amazing how matches between completely different players can be so similar, though given the total number of matches vs the range of possible scenarios, I guess you can find multiple matches to fit every pattern that's not especially rare.

Was only commenting on the Wimbledon match. If I had to pick between them I'd say Davydenko played a better match but Dimitrov definitely played well himself.

I do think Djokovic's 2014 Wimbledon draw was very tough overall.

 

[AnOctorokForDinner]

Was only commenting on the Wimbledon match. If I had to pick between them I'd say Davydenko played a better match but Dimitrov definitely played well himself.

I do think Djokovic's 2014 Wimbledon draw was very tough overall.

As tough as it could get ni the last 15 years, short of playing peak Federer/Nadal/Roddick/Murygoat. Underrated somehow (with the final either underrated or overrated by most involved fans, apparently), strange that.

 

[NatF]

As tough as it could get ni the last 15 years, short of playing peak Federer/Nadal/Roddick/Murygoat. Underrated somehow (with the final either underrated or overrated by most involved fans, apparently), strange that.

Your thoughts comparing the 2014 F to the 2009 F?

 

[OhYes]

For your information I’ve made several videos of both Djokovic and Nadal, and unlike several other people around here, I can still appreciate their greatness without beating another player down.

That is exactly what would someone say if he was hired by Federer family.

 

[TheMaestro1990]

That is exactly what would someone say if he was hired by Federer family.

Well, if you don't believe, check my channel. Far from only videos of Federer.

 

[AnOctorokForDinner]

Your thoughts comparing the 2014 F to the 2009 F?

First three sets - slight edge 2009 for more drama/closeness (in 2009, both sets 1 and 2 could've easily gone the other way; in 2014, only set 1), quality/style similar and I'm not interested in nitpicking.
Last two sets - 2009 easy. 2014 4th set was dramatic but so mentally tight lol, five breaks combined (the hell!); 2009 4th set was a sweet clean performance from Roddick, close to the 1st set of the 04 final imo (less effort since fewer of his serves were returned). 5th set is obvious, an extended serving epic in 09 versus Federer cracking after missing a half-chance at 4-4 in 2014.
Overall 2009 clearly, but 2014 stays more or less in its vicinity until the 5th set, then nope.