Similar racquet to the Wilson 6.1 Prostaff Classic 95 16x18

njhmusicman

Semi-Pro
Hi guys! So I have 3 of the Wilson 6.1 Prostaff Classic 95 16x18 racquets and they are doing great but I was just curious what would be a modern racquet replacement?
Here are the specs:

Wilson ProStaff 6.1 Classic
Head Size: 95 sq. in.
Strung Weight: 12.6oz / 357g
Balance: 11pts Head Light
Swingweight: 326
Stiffness: 72
Beam Width: 21 mm Straight Beam
Power Level: Low
Swing Speed: Very Fast
String Pattern: 16x18

I checked TW's racquet finder and I could not find one that was close. I checked Angell's website and their 95 custom racquet with 70 RA looked like the closest that I could find. Thanks in advance!
 

marco forehand

Semi-Pro
The Angell TC 90 is closest in the Angell line. I transitioned from the 6.1 classic to the TC90. The TC 90 offered the chance to get a slightly lower swing weight (which was my goal) but you could go with a higher static weight then I did and have the same spec as your 6.1. Maybe lower your reference tension 2#.
 

McLovin

Legend
Hi guys! So I have 3 of the Wilson 6.1 Prostaff Classic 95 16x18 racquets and they are doing great but I was just curious what would be a modern racquet replacement?
Here are the specs:

Wilson ProStaff 6.1 Classic
Head Size: 95 sq. in.
Strung Weight: 12.6oz / 357g
Balance: 11pts Head Light
Swingweight: 326
Stiffness: 72
Beam Width: 21 mm Straight Beam
Power Level: Low
Swing Speed: Very Fast
String Pattern: 16x18

I checked TW's racquet finder and I could not find one that was close. I checked Angell's website and their 95 custom racquet with 70 RA looked like the closest that I could find. Thanks in advance!
So, the first question is: Have you been playing with these for the last 20 years? Or even 10 years?

If the answer is 'yes', then the next question is: Do you want the new frame to play like they are now, or like they were 10-20 years ago?

Because basically you can throw the 'Stiffness' spec out the window. They're probably closer to 60 or 62 now.

Having said that. I'd give the VCORE 95 a swing, assuming you're looking to stay w/ the 95 sq in head. Replace the base grip w/ a leather, add some lead in the throat, and a little lead at 3 & 9 to balance it out, and you're basically at 330g, 12pts HL (which is what I believe the Pro Staff Classic 6.1 came in at).
 

joe sch

Legend
If you love the 6.1 classics then why not get a few more for you stock.
There was also a company called mega age dot com that made a M1 model that was very similar, same mold and similar specs.
Its hard to find new old stock 6.1 classic, I only have a few nice used models. I do have a pair of M1s.
I dont think the modern graphite can provide a similar experience.
 

njhmusicman

Semi-Pro
So, the first question is: Have you been playing with these for the last 20 years? Or even 10 years?

If the answer is 'yes', then the next question is: Do you want the new frame to play like they are now, or like they were 10-20 years ago?

Because basically you can throw the 'Stiffness' spec out the window. They're probably closer to 60 or 62 now.

Having said that. I'd give the VCORE 95 a swing, assuming you're looking to stay w/ the 95 sq in head. Replace the base grip w/ a leather, add some lead in the throat, and a little lead at 3 & 9 to balance it out, and you're basically at 330g, 12pts HL (which is what I believe the Pro Staff Classic 6.1 came in at).
I've only been using the racket for a couple of years so it is still pretty stiff and I am a fan of stiff racquets. My next question is, so I have three of these Wilson Pro Staff six one 95 racquets and they are in fairly good condition and I like them so should I try to buy more online and through the forum here and try to gather as many as I can or should I just use what I have now and then just replace it with something modern later?
 

McLovin

Legend
My next question is, so I have three of these Wilson Pro Staff six one 95 racquets and they are in fairly good condition and I like them so should I try to buy more online and through the forum here and try to gather as many as I can or should I just use what I have now and then just replace it with something modern later?
That is the $64,000 question.

If you're somewhat serious about your game and want to continue improving, then the answer is 'yes', find some more and stock up.

If you're a degenerate racquet-aholic and can't stop demoing new frames, thinking the next new technology is going to produce 'the one', then the answer is still 'yes', but buy the new technology frames ones alongside the 6.1s, because a true racquet-aholic can never have too many frames...
 

musicsoul

Rookie
I would say the Yonex SV 95. It’s stiffer and more powerful then the new version. You have to get the weight up yourself to get it in your spec, but is a nice modern 95 inch racquet
 

SFrazeur

Legend
Chances are you will not find one all that close. Make of a list of the qualities and specs that you like of the 6.1 and search the racquet finder based on it.
 

fuzz nation

G.O.A.T.
When I switched away from the 6.1 Classics, I wanted something with more flex and baseline control. The Volkl C10 was an easy transition for me at the time - instant boost in baseline consistency and the overall package had a similar weight and balance as my 6.1's. I can also say that compared with some other 98" frames I've used through recent years, the C10 gives me the impression of a racquet that's a little less clunky like a 95". It might be the somewhat narrow beam - not sure.

I also re-tooled my ground strokes when I made that racquet switch - including my re-learning a solid one-handed backhand - and the comfort of the C10 strung with a snug bed of syn. gut has been wonderfully easy on my arm. This frame gives me all the power I could want, but it's not quite as spin-friendly as a couple of other rigs I've used. It's a decent alternative to the 6.1 Classic, but it does have its own personality.

I also agree with the recommendation of the 95" Yonex models you might find. If I were to go looking for new racquets from that brand, those are the first ones I'd try. I've had a couple of outings with the RF 97 and I suppose that this frame is something of a modern update to the 6.1 Classics. Because the RF 97 was a bit similar to the 6.1 Classic, it wasn't for me, but it did have "that personality" of solid heft, head-light balance, and decent pop. Easy to hit the ball with some zip (including serves), great for serve and volley action, but a bit too unpredictable for me around the baseline.

You might want to also check out the Volkl V-Sense 10 Mid. I haven't played this one myself, but it looks like something that's rather close to the layout of the 6.1 Classic (96" Volkl hoop is close to the 95" 6.1) with a little less weight. That's not a big deal to adjust yourself with some lead tape and a little home tuning. I've had great success with dialing in a couple of racquets myself in recent years. Nobody is producing frames that are very close to the 6.1 Classic in terms of weight, balance, etc., but I think that a little tuning can often get a lighter racquet closer to that familiar design.

I also had a quick sampling with the Prince TT 95 a couple summers back. That's another frame with a layout in the neighborhood of the 6.1 Classic, but the TT 95 is also a bit less hefty and offers a little extra flex.
 

wings56

Hall of Fame
I recently switched away from my Ncode six one 95s. I had been playing with them for the last 15 years and had idea how much stiffness they lost until picking up some new frames.

The RF97A was a pretty seamless transition. Soooo much more power than the six ones. I guess that's just the difference in the flex that was lost...
 
Top