Time to sleepWhat it tell us?
She has applied for a visa to enter Finland.What it tell us?
OkTime to sleep
Or rather:Rybakina is better. Swiatek inherited number 1, she hasn't fully earned it yet.
she's introverted and quiet, so people assume she's this innocent, wholesome person. but in one of her pressers, she straight up said she thinks other girls would be jealous of her lol
Straight out of her idol's playbook as well. Just take the L Iga without sounding like a sore loser.
Iga has some growing up to do mentally.
Straight out of her idol's playbook as well. Just take the L Iga without sounding like a sore loser.
It also tells us that pushers like Iga raise to the top in a sport of errors. That's why Federer is the most beloved, being an attacking player.It tells us that if Rybakina is on her game and dialed in, she can beat anyone on tour. Not exactly earth shattering news.
Iga is still the rightful #1, but she's not invincible. She'll have days where she can lose to fellow top players.
That’s the hardest part to tell.What it tell us?
Seems that the more we are, the merrier.She has applied for a visa to enter Finland.
I can’t sleep. What this tells us/me?
I would not go that far.Rybakina is better. Swiatek inherited number 1, she hasn't fully earned it yet.
Meh she couldn't even reach finals of AO despite constantly breadsticking and bageling everyone. Rybakina is the one who stopped her there and now she's crushing her 6-2 6-2 at IW thats crazy. After Swiatek owning everyone else. Its very clear Rybakina is much better and Sabalenka must be tooIt tells us that if Rybakina is on her game and dialed in, she can beat anyone on tour. Not exactly earth shattering news.
Iga is still the rightful #1, but she's not invincible. She'll have days where she can lose to fellow top players.
But seriously: what it tell us?
More like Saba and Rybkina battling for slams as long as healthyRybakina has a damn solid game. Iga will be fine, of course. But I can see Iga, Saba and Rybakina battling for slams for the next few years. And I'm hear for it.
The Aussie final was the best women's slam final in eons, fwiw. I would love more of those level matches in the future.
I can understand that, it means she cares greatly about winning. What I find obnoxious is the way she doesn't give credit to her opponent and places the loss on some sort of injury, that's what I can't stand about Nadal either.Iga is pretty salty when she loses lol
Is she Finnish?What it tell us?
That’s what I mean by salty. Being a sore loser. Yeah, just take a look at what she tweeted after the match. Implying clearly that she lost due to injury. She’s a bad loser. Such a shame because I liked her all this while.I can understand that, it means she cares greatly about winning. What I find obnoxious is the way she doesn't give credit to her opponent and places the loss on some sort of injury, that's what I can't stand about Nadal either.
Just give credit to your opponent.
Vamos Rafa.That’s what I mean by salty. Being a sore loser. Yeah, just take a look at what she tweeted after the match. Implying clearly that she lost due to injury. She’s a bad loser. Such a shame because I liked her all this while.
Excuses for injuries are a sign of poor sportsmanship. Such an attitude from Iga is disappointing.That’s what I mean by salty. Being a sore loser. Yeah, just take a look at what she tweeted after the match. Implying clearly that she lost due to injury. She’s a bad loser. Such a shame because I liked her all this while.
That’s what I mean by salty. Being a sore loser. Yeah, just take a look at what she tweeted after the match. Implying clearly that she lost due to injury. She’s a bad loser. Such a shame because I liked her all this while.
More like discomfort with RybThat’s what I mean by salty. Being a sore loser. Yeah, just take a look at what she tweeted after the match. Implying clearly that she lost due to injury. She’s a bad loser. Such a shame because I liked her all this while.
I thought the system worked like this: the player who accumulates the most points in a 52 week period is ranked first, followed by the player with the next highest number of points, and so on. Is there another, subjective, method of being the highest ranked, ie #1 player of which I'm unaware? Please advise. Thanks.Rybakina is better. Swiatek inherited number 1, she hasn't fully earned it yet.
Back in 2018, Johnny Mac picked Sabalenka to win the US Open (Osaka won it). This was basically based on her playing up to her obvious talent. It has taken five years to mentally find that vein of being physically, emotionally and mentally consistent over a week. Best said by someone that they were not aware until the semi final match finished that he never thought (like the year before) that the serve was ever an issue.… and in Sabalenka and Rybakina you get the rare mix of serving excellence and baseline skill that she has only seen 6 or 7 times in her entire career so far.
Iga has some growing up to do mentally.
She’s so used to running roughshod over her opponents with 5-6 breaks that I think she isn’t up to the task of playing “men’s style tennis” where you only get 1 look at a break per set and you have to re-focus on holding serve.
Even in her best performances on HC I think she struggles to hold consistently, and moreover I think she plays 95% of her matches against players who she knows she can break easily. There really isn’t a long catalogue of match practice on quicker surfaces against capable servers for her… and in Sabalenka and Rybakina you get the rare mix of serving excellence and baseline skill that she has only seen 6 or 7 times in her entire career so far.
She really struggles holding focus and confidence after a long service game and is prone to getting double broken when there’s scoreboard pressure. Her coaches have to do a better job preparing her to win this sort of match… and it starts with her serve