Swiatek just got KOed

puppybutts

Hall of Fame

Straight out of her idol's playbook as well. Just take the L Iga without sounding like a sore loser.
she's introverted and quiet, so people assume she's this innocent, wholesome person. but in one of her pressers, she straight up said she thinks other girls would be jealous of her lol

personally, these kinds of statements don't bother me...it is rather impossible to be the best in the world at something without having an ego. it is incredibly boring to hear "there were some things I could have done better, but credit to my opponent, they were the better player today" x1000 in every press conference when it's just lip service. of course every player thinks they could beat anyone else if they have their day...if they didn't, why bother? unless you're someone like bublik who just treats tennis as a job.
 

Kralingen

Talk Tennis Guru

Straight out of her idol's playbook as well. Just take the L Iga without sounding like a sore loser.
Iga has some growing up to do mentally.

She’s so used to running roughshod over her opponents with 5-6 breaks that I think she isn’t up to the task of playing “men’s style tennis” where you only get 1 look at a break per set and you have to re-focus on holding serve.

Even in her best performances on HC I think she struggles to hold consistently, and moreover I think she plays 95% of her matches against players who she knows she can break easily. There really isn’t a long catalogue of match practice on quicker surfaces against capable servers for her… and in Sabalenka and Rybakina you get the rare mix of serving excellence and baseline skill that she has only seen 6 or 7 times in her entire career so far.

She really struggles holding focus and confidence after a long service game and is prone to getting double broken when there’s scoreboard pressure. Her coaches have to do a better job preparing her to win this sort of match… and it starts with her serve
 

Fintft

G.O.A.T.
It tells us that if Rybakina is on her game and dialed in, she can beat anyone on tour. Not exactly earth shattering news.

Iga is still the rightful #1, but she's not invincible. She'll have days where she can lose to fellow top players.
It also tells us that pushers like Iga raise to the top in a sport of errors. That's why Federer is the most beloved, being an attacking player.
 

LuckyR

Legend
Iga happened to play poorly against an opponent who played better than average and who matches up well against her. Happens in tennis all the time. The only unusual thing about the situation is that Iga hasn't played poorly very often in the last 51 weeks, but only someone unfamiliar with statistics would suppose that a player won't play poorly some of the time, regardless of who they are.
 

D-Lite

Hall of Fame
I don't want to get ahead of myself but if Rybakina and Sabalenka could dominate this season and play 6-8+ times... I am praying for this WTA rivalry to ignite. I'll be pulling for Rybakina to get revenge, but another 3 setters is probable so it could go either way.
 
It tells us that if Rybakina is on her game and dialed in, she can beat anyone on tour. Not exactly earth shattering news.

Iga is still the rightful #1, but she's not invincible. She'll have days where she can lose to fellow top players.
Meh she couldn't even reach finals of AO despite constantly breadsticking and bageling everyone. Rybakina is the one who stopped her there and now she's crushing her 6-2 6-2 at IW thats crazy. After Swiatek owning everyone else. Its very clear Rybakina is much better and Sabalenka must be too
 

Keizer

Hall of Fame
She has a horrible serve and it shows against these players. Saw she was winning <50% of first serve points at one point in this match. That’s just not acceptable against top opposition. They need to retool that serve like Sinner did his.
 

jondice

Semi-Pro
Rybakina has a damn solid game. Iga will be fine, of course. But I can see Iga, Saba and Rybakina battling for slams for the next few years. And I'm hear for it.

The Aussie final was the best women's slam final in eons, fwiw. I would love more of those level matches in the future.
 
Rybakina has a damn solid game. Iga will be fine, of course. But I can see Iga, Saba and Rybakina battling for slams for the next few years. And I'm hear for it.

The Aussie final was the best women's slam final in eons, fwiw. I would love more of those level matches in the future.
More like Saba and Rybkina battling for slams as long as healthy
 

Enceladus

Legend
Iga protrude over the game field on the clay, but doesn't have such an advantage on the hard surface. As @Keizer pointed out, Iga doesn't have a very good serve, which makes her more vulnerable on HC.
 

tex123

Hall of Fame
I seriously don't like Sabalenka or Rybakina's ball bashing tennis. I guess she was too powerful for Iga. I long for someone like Henin to dominate women's tennis.
 

Krish0608

G.O.A.T.
I can understand that, it means she cares greatly about winning. What I find obnoxious is the way she doesn't give credit to her opponent and places the loss on some sort of injury, that's what I can't stand about Nadal either.

Just give credit to your opponent.
That’s what I mean by salty. Being a sore loser. Yeah, just take a look at what she tweeted after the match. Implying clearly that she lost due to injury. She’s a bad loser. Such a shame because I liked her all this while.

 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
Last year and going into this year it was like Iga was unbeatable for how dominate she was. Sabalanka has absolutely taken her game to the next level. As did Rybakana. And both of their styles give Iga trouble. So Igas run of dominating the tour just got interesting. She will have to adjust.
 

Enceladus

Legend

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
That’s what I mean by salty. Being a sore loser. Yeah, just take a look at what she tweeted after the match. Implying clearly that she lost due to injury. She’s a bad loser. Such a shame because I liked her all this while.


Her behavior at the net after a loss is always salty. Can’t look her opponent in the eyes and congratulate her. When she lost to pegula in that world tour team tennis in Australia - she literally broke down in tears when she got ko’d 2,3.

She is a salty loser. When Barty retired she dominated what I thought was a rather open competition. Sabalanka has a dominate style that can dominate the tour. She keeps her mental game on page and consistency - she can easily take over #1.
 

sovertennis

Professional
Rybakina is better. Swiatek inherited number 1, she hasn't fully earned it yet.
I thought the system worked like this: the player who accumulates the most points in a 52 week period is ranked first, followed by the player with the next highest number of points, and so on. Is there another, subjective, method of being the highest ranked, ie #1 player of which I'm unaware? Please advise. Thanks.
 

RayPS97

New User
… and in Sabalenka and Rybakina you get the rare mix of serving excellence and baseline skill that she has only seen 6 or 7 times in her entire career so far.
Back in 2018, Johnny Mac picked Sabalenka to win the US Open (Osaka won it). This was basically based on her playing up to her obvious talent. It has taken five years to mentally find that vein of being physically, emotionally and mentally consistent over a week. Best said by someone that they were not aware until the semi final match finished that he never thought (like the year before) that the serve was ever an issue.

Rybakina is Graff like ...not sure where her ceiling will be but she is just fine. As said, Sabalenka and her will be rivals in the near and mid term.
 
Last edited:

smalahove

Hall of Fame
Iga has some growing up to do mentally.

She’s so used to running roughshod over her opponents with 5-6 breaks that I think she isn’t up to the task of playing “men’s style tennis” where you only get 1 look at a break per set and you have to re-focus on holding serve.

Even in her best performances on HC I think she struggles to hold consistently, and moreover I think she plays 95% of her matches against players who she knows she can break easily. There really isn’t a long catalogue of match practice on quicker surfaces against capable servers for her… and in Sabalenka and Rybakina you get the rare mix of serving excellence and baseline skill that she has only seen 6 or 7 times in her entire career so far.

She really struggles holding focus and confidence after a long service game and is prone to getting double broken when there’s scoreboard pressure. Her coaches have to do a better job preparing her to win this sort of match… and it starts with her serve

I agree her serve is her achilles heel, but I also thinks her groundstroke technique is exposed on surfaces that allow the opponent to play hard and flat/more penetrating (even thought IW is considered a slow HC).
Her contact point on the FH looks late/pressed on many shots, and the BH doesn't look that much better. I can see how this might work on clay, but it's def a flaw that can be easily exploited on faster and lower bouncing surfaces by big girl tennis.

I used to think she would have taken the throne from Barty if the latter had continued. Now I'm sure she would not. Barty's toolbox allowed her to have a plan B and C. I have yet to see any plan B from Iga.
 
Top