Wow that was fast.
Head should just produce the pro-stock rackets since the demand is high. They can charge a higher price for them.yep -- looks like they're all gone...
Which pros on the tour play with this racquet? Does anyone know?
Safin used it, but he's not a pro anymore I guess
Head should just produce the pro-stock rackets since the demand is high. They can charge a higher price for them.
Sorry you missed out.
Instead of giving them away to pros for free, they could sell them to us .
Why feel sorry about not having to spend $240 on a racquet that it might NOT right for you even though you should be able to sell it for more money quickly?
I thought his was 18/20?
So no microgel or twaron in these at all, right?
I'm sure it's TT members who bought out TW's supply of the 237.2, and this racquet deserves a decent review. So someone please write a review of this racquet when they get it.
Then why do you even care that they're already sold out?How unfortunate that this thread brought attention to it and now there all sold out. Won't be suprised to see em on thE bay at near PC600 prices. This morning I was scoping out a 4 1/2 on the site. I got no money anyways.
Too bad that everyone who got one probably can't really use it.....
I play the tgk 237.2 its 16x19
TW is incorrect I dont know maybe there 237.2 were misprinted and suppose to be 237.1
Like Pistol Pete says, they are indeed 16x19. When I called, the friendly TW sales associate went to the warehouse and got one to confirm. I think whatever initial confusion there was came from the incorrect info on the website and the fact that the racquets were only available for such a short period of time, some sales associates may not have seen it yet. I was told they went on sale yesterday afternoon and sold out this morning.
Indeed this is a very healthy indicator for Head. They can easily raise the price to even higher .. so much for the bad economy. A lots of people are dying to pay over $200 for a pro-stock racquet.What they're sold-out?????
They just went-up yesterday...
Hopefully this is a good sign to the manufacturers...
We're willing to pay extra for craftmanship and QC.
So they are prestige mids (not midpluses) in a custom 16x19 pattern? Im confused.
So they are prestige mids (not midpluses) in a custom 16x19 pattern? Im confused.
The reason people here trust and respect VSB is because over the years he shares his knowledge with people here. VSB contributed alot to the board. Everybody could be wrong sometimes. And so yes VSB could be wrong on this matter, but at least he is not like someone who try to sell these pro stocks for big bucks. You have connections to get these pro stocks, and you have tried couple times to sell them, on the board. Didn't you?
WHat is the point of this comment???
Yes, he has done it.
I have done it too.
Is he supposed to donate them or something?
Yes, he has done it.
I have done it too.
WHat is the point of this comment???
Yes, he has done it.
I have done it too.
Is he supposed to donate them or something?
Good point! It may not be applicable to racket manufacturing, quality control is non existent or way at the bottom of importance as the factories in China focus primarily in cost reduction that may resort to adulteration of process or material in the name of profitability. The company for which I work had to recall many products because one of our suppliers subcontracted their manufacturing to a Chinese company.I beg to differ. I could say with absolute confidence that the PS85 made in China absolutely sucks to the one made in Chicago, St. Vincent, and even Taiwan.
uhhhmmm, do you have anything to say???
will it be hard to get a replacement grommet for this thing? 93 sq in with a 16x19 string pattern...
The FDA cracks down on all false claims and payments to doctors for anything that might influence the sale of products. Why can't the sport equipment be subject to the same level of scrutiny for consumer protection?
Did you also send an UNSOLICITED email to numerous people here, listing a whole bunch of pro stocks for sale?
Yes, RacquetCraft is a great contributor to this board IMO.
Also, a lot of the stuff ont his board is PURE spculation, so I am not quite sure who really contributed to the stuff (including myself)...
So you are saying what RacquetCraft posted could be PURE speculation. And you don't know who is right and who is wrong.