CentreCourt
Rookie
Not a single seed before the semi-finals for Rafa. A draw that looks difficult to casual observers, but actually is played against guys who've done nothing for 12 months.
Your inability to comprehend borders on being charming, in a Forrest Gump sort of way. Yes, it's conditional captain obvious. There is not a single player on tour outside of the big 3 that are particularly consistent. I see the idea of ceilings is beyond your grasp and you are just going to carry on with your inane objections.
Yeah, Fed fans don't post "nonstop nonsensical threads" according to you. You are quite the objective kid hahahaha.
Today: Querrey.
Tough draw! Tough opponent on Court No. 1!
Top 10 opponent who consistently is in the QF of slams.... Or a guy outside the top 50 who is supposedly a great server who gets broken 4 times in the first two sets.Querrey running around like a headless chicken. What a “threat”.
VB Landers can’t stop shivering.
Lol Querrey has done nothing on grass last year and Kyrgios has done nothing last year as well. But they are bigger threats than Berrettini who just won a grass title.
VB Landers always trying to make an elephant out of an ant.
Querrey running around like a headless chicken. What a “threat”.
VB Landers can’t stop shivering.
LOL, RG 2019 was the latestA Federer - Nadal and a Federer/Nadal - Djokovic at Wimbledon is going to be spectacular. Have we ever had these 3 in the semifinal before, can't remember it with all 3 in top 4 until this year.
Lol. The draw was mediocre. But considering the quality of today's men's tennis outside the big 3, most draws are mediocre or worse until the semifinals. You have grandpa Federer making the semifinal of Roland Garros ffs at 38. If that is not proof of weak field nothing is.
LOL, RG 2019 was the latest
Federer fans now say that Nishikori is playing his best tennis in a long time and if we add that he is relatively rested this time, he is a risky rival, even more dangerous than the big server, Querrey.
LOL, RG 2019 was the latest
Not a single seed before the semi-finals for Rafa. A draw that looks difficult to casual observers, but actually is played against guys who've done nothing for 12 months.
First tough opponent and the Nadal couldn't handle it.
It's a shame that the title was edited though.This thread was pretty cool while it lasted.
Was it?It's a shame that the title was edited though.
Yeah, was originally "the thoughtest draw".Was it?
I'm warning you @Breakpointerer
Don't show up at AO2020. I want roger to win the whole thing, but that can be very ugly if you're the version of roger that happens to appear
The stress would kill me first.I want Roger to win it while wasting truckloads of BPs along the way just to troll everyone
I want Roger to win it while wasting truckloads of BPs along the way just to troll everyone
Don't worry fella, I'll arrange the cremation process for you, and make sure you'll come back like phoenixThe stress would kill me first.
They won't unless I translate everything you sayWill the mods block me if I curse in Hindi in the match thread when fed's blowing the b.p.s??
Don't worry fella, I'll arrange the cremation process for you, and make sure you'll come back like phoenix
Which, my friend you won't, right??They won't unless I translate everything you say
I might lolWhich, my friend you won't, right??
Afterall it won't be you I'll be cursing
(。•̀ᴗ-)✧
Kaisa dost hai re tuI might lol
Tsonga and Cilic weren't anywhere close to their best nor highly ranked at that point. And Querrey is stronger in the first 3 rounds.Nadal already had little chances to win Wimbledon before the draw (last year he was close to win), but with this draw he has literally no chance. Nor would Federer or Djokovic win with this draw. No one can. This is the toughest draw of all time.
Here is Nadal's draw:
1R: Sugita
2R: Kyrgios
3R: Tsonga (Tsonga almost defeated Federer at Halle, and many Fed fans said they did not want to have Tsonga in Federer's draw).
4R: Cilic (Wimbledon finalist, has been close to defeat both Federer and Djokovic at Wimbledon in the past).
QF: Querrey (great serve, Eastbourne 2019 finalist, defeated Djokovic at Wimbledon 2016).
SF: Federer
F: Djokovic
This is the most brutal draw the history of tennis has ever seen. Not even the US Open 1990 comes close to this. Sampras had to defeat Muster, Lendl, McEnroe and Agassi to win the US Open 1990. But Muster, Lendl, McEnroe and Agassi "only" sum 23 Majors between the four, while Cilic, Federer and Djokovic sum 36 Grand Slams between the three. McEnroe, Lendl and Agassi are "weak" ATG compared to Federer and Djokovic.
Now it's been replaced by RG 2021.fun times were had in this thread, for sure
He is deadly wrong here, Thiem is much better than these two mugs.The OP often compares Thiem to Lendl and Kuerten, it seems he has a problem with overrating...
Nah a lot of us were just messing aroundFor those of you who were around in 2019 - were all those likes on Sport and Weakera's posts sarcastic? Did people actually believe this stuff? Lol
It's too bad mods went in and misspelled the title.The thread that never stops giving
I was dead serious.Nah a lot of us were just messing around
No, it was all completely serious. Most definitely. Just like how the average @Federer and Del Potro post is always exactly right.For those of you who were around in 2019 - were all those likes on Sport and Weakera's posts sarcastic? Did people actually believe this stuff? Lol
Short of deleting the thread altogether this was the worst thing they could've doneIt's too bad mods went in and misspelled the title.
Context?Short of deleting the thread altogether this was the worst thing they could've done