manny pacquiao P4P king
Banned
i never watched his matches, i know that he has power, but was it dominant in the 90's, and if so, why didn't he win a slam?
It was big, 149mph with the old speed gun(probably over 155mph with the new speed gun), but it was no Sampras's serve.
It was big, 149mph with the old speed gun(probably over 155mph with the new speed gun), but it was no Sampras's serve.
On the radar used at the time, the 149mph serve would have been more like 165mph on current radar, HOWEVER, the 149mph radar was also recorded on a very suspicious radar which seemed to be recording everyone fast. It may have been roughly equivalent to the radar used today!
It is very likely that Rusedski, at his best, was as fast or faster than Roddick. I note also that Roddick is more consistent with his faster serves(and thus can use his "fastball" much more often), while Rusedski resorted to a lot of slice, slice/topspin to keep his percentages up. When Rusedski really let go, it was probably as fast, or a TOUCH faster than Roddick.
Rusedski's serve didn't "dominate" consistently, because his fastball was not terribly consistent. His slice and topspin serves, while good, were not particularly outstanding. Sampras, Ivanisevic and many others had serves more damaging, except perhaps on the 1 day a month where Rusedski served all out and happened to get a lot of flat serves in.
30+ aces is usually an indication that the matches were long and tight. Players who has more weapon than just the serve usually don't have to ace an opponent outright and they can resort to hitting a safer flat bomb and finish off the point with a forehand or volley instead.Rusedski never served any faster than 142.5 mph except that one 149 mph serve, and that particular match he was clocking surprisingly high on the radar gun.
The guys here summed it up nicely already. His flatter serve was a killer, but he resorted to his much more consistent topspin-slice a lot, just like Goran. And, being a lefty, he also used his slice outwide on the ad side a lot.
He had 10 matches with 30+ aces, though
37 aces in 4 sets vs Sampras (grand slam cup 97)
35 aces in 5 sets vs stark (wimby 97)
34 aces in 5 sets vs goran(vienna 97)
33 aces in 3 sets vs gollene-(london 98 )
33 aces in 4 sets vs delaitre(wimby 95)
32 aces in 3 sets vs reneberg (wimby 97)
31 aces in 5 sets vs kiefer (vienna 99)
31 aces in 3 sets vs waske (wimby 2003)
30 aces in 3 sets vs toJo (stockholm 96)
30 aces in 5 sets vs ulihrach (USO 98 )
In comparison, I have Sampras with four 30+ matches, Karlovic with 27, Philippoussis with 16, Wayne Arthurs with 22, Ivan Ljubicic with 10, and Goran Ivanisevic with 34
But four of those 10 matches were 3 setters. That's 10 aces a set, which would translate to 20 aces in a regular straight sets match30+ aces is usually an indication that the matches were long and tight. Players who has more weapon than just the serve usually don't have to ace an opponent outright and they can resort to hitting a safer flat bomb and finish off the point with a forehand or volley instead.
But four of those 10 matches were 3 setters.
But four of those 10 matches were 3 setters. That's 10 aces a set, which would translate to 20 aces in a regular straight sets match
I see your point... but what has to do with the OP question?It doesn't work that way. 3 tight sets can produce more aces than 5 setters that are not very tight. The pressure of the match usually brings out the best in a one dimensional players who has the serve as their only weapon.
I see your point... but what has to do with the OP question?
Was Greg's serve great? Yes, it was. It wasn't MARVELOUS as Goran's, Pete's or Richard's, but I would ranking him Top10 of all times.
i never watched his matches, i know that he has power, but was it dominant in the 90's, and if so, why didn't he win a slam?
I think Rusedski's "149 mph serve" tends to give him more attention that he deserves.
It was big, 149mph with the old speed gun(probably over 155mph with the new speed gun), but it was no Sampras's serve.
But four of those 10 matches were 3 setters. That's 10 aces a set, which would translate to 20 aces in a regular straight sets match
It was big, 149mph with the old speed gun(probably over 155mph with the new speed gun), but it was no Sampras's serve.
I think Rusedski may win a "Worst Backhand" poll, it really was awful
In fact it shows how good his serve must have been, when you think about it!!!
To answer the OP question, Rusedski's serve is not great by any means. The one thing which happens to be the most important thing is consistency. His serve, while big, lacks consistency, accuracy, and clutchness under pressure.
The guy had as much chance to win a slam as Karlovic.
Except Karlovic can hit a backhand so maybe Karlovic has the edge.
or maybe rusedski got to a slam final so he has the edge :roll:
He genuinely did have an awesome serve, and a very good forehand
On the rare occasion that he got his backhand working, he was very difficult to beat by anyone!!!
Yes he had a great serve but apart from that he has a great personality. Sadly his career did not turn out the way he wanted it to
Not true of course. He was one of the most unpopular pro players of his generation among his peers. His entire career was marked by objectionable behavior, from his early "defection" from Canada to his absurd, faked british accent (immediately after the defection) which prompted mockery even from Canadians, Brits, and even Andre Agassi, right to his poor sportsmanship at the end (bad mouthing people like Todd Martin and Pete Sampras). Not to mention his steroid usage (and subsequent successful, but absolutely ludicrous argument to get off on the charges). Simply a whiney, fake, cheater.
Is he still playing? I thought he retired a couple of years ago.i never watched his matches, i know that he has power, but was it dominant in the 90's, and if so, why didn't he win a slam?
Well I must admit I only saw some of his play and was impressed with his serve. I can only judge him how I see him today and he comes over as a thoroughly pleasant person
Is he still playing? I thought he retired a couple of years ago.