lol they will never get over it.
Like 6 different points Nadal could've won to more than likely take the championship.
Having said that, they can't really complain since everything went in Nadal's favour most of the tournament.
I think it was 2-3 points that decided the winner of the match. If there is a match where it could have gone EITHER WAY, this is the one. Their stats was scarily identical. But Djokovic made it out alive in the end thanks to his serve.
The rules are really simple. No one complained about it before, only now when the "wrong" guy won. Tradition or not, seems perfectly logical that if a match starts under the roof it should finish that way, cause outdoor vs Indoor is vastly different. You don't want the same match to be played under two totally different conditions. That's logical to anyone but the v amos brigade.
It has gone more than a week since the match unfolded and here we are still discussing it. Djokovic won the match, that's it. It's not his fault that he is a more versatile player than Nadal making indoors for him an advantage. But considering how the match was, it didn't look like Djokovic had an advantage. Nadal was perfectly fine under the conditions.
