If some of us feel that Fed wasn't at his peak by 2008(wasn't at his 2004-2006 level of play anymore) it doesn't mean we hate Nadal.
Also the fact that Fed performed better in some slams on the road to the final in 2008 compared to 2009 doesn't tell the whole story as draws were different and have an effect whether Fed loses a set or not.
Despite how much you want to overlook Fed's 2008 masters results it is still telling that in 2009 Fed aside from Bennetau didn't lose to a player out of top 10 while you know 2008 losses in the first half ot the year.
2008 Nadal was too good for 2008 version of Fed,fair enough.Whether he would have been too good(in slams and finished #1) for 2004,2005 or 2006 aside from clay Federer is another story and it's one's right to believe he wouldn't,that doesn't mean that that person hates Nadal.
It's the same way you feel that Nadal wasn't mentally up to par with Murray in this AO's match,does it means you hate Murray?
I was merely refering to those that don't believe that Nadal is a bad matchup for Federer,no matter what Fed's form is. Masters don't mean **** to Federer and this is evident even to his most ardent fans. Up until Madrid 2009 Federer hadn't won a masters title since Cincy 2007(in august). So Federer went the second half of 07',the whole of 08'(lost 3 clay MS finals to Nadal)and the first four months of 09" without winning one masters final. When did that ever happen to him in GS's? Oh,I know, he raised his game(probably even his health) in GS'S. Which only serves to prove my point. I watched a healthy Fed basically hand a match to ferrer in cincy cause he looked bored(and ferrer managed to lose) on court only to super smash djoker and murray later in that tournament. He also managed to blow a 5-1 lead in the decider against Tsonga in Montreal. When has that ever happened to him in a GS?
Never.
Federer doesn't care about masters,people,you have to understand that,at least not as much as GS's.
Let's look a bit at the facts,by pre-prime,prime(2004-2006) and post-prime(2007 onwards) according to fed fans:
2003: he makes one masters final and one GS final(WB)
2004: he makes 3 MS finals and 3 GS finals(AO,WB and USO)
2005: he makes 4 MS finals and 3 GS finals(AO,WB and USO)
2006: he makes 6 MS finals and 4 GS finals(all of them)
2007: he makes 5 MS finals and 4 GS finals(all of them)
2008: he makes 2 MS finals and 3 GS finals(RG,WB,USO)
2009: he makes 2 MS finals and 4 GS finals(all of them).
Look at how wildly his MS level varies yet his GS level stays almost the same.
Federer is all about the slams. He assesses his year by how he does in Slams,not masters. If Federer would have met any other player than Nadal in RG and WB,mono or no mono,he would have creamed them and won 3 GS that year. I cannot buy mono from Fed in the later half of 2008 when his level goes down a lot in the weaker tournaments yet he shows up at the same level in the stronger tournaments,at least where the physical side is concerned.