Yeah,just like he played so much better all through Wimby last year,but still beat Nadal in the final right? Or even before that,where Nadal played better than he did throughout most of the clay season,but Rolaids still beat him the Rome and Madrid finals right? For the last time,how these two are playing up until they face each other means jack. Nadal still loses no matter if he's played the better of the two or not.
No he hasn't. Nadal has not beaten Rolaids in a slam in 2 years. He has lost 7 finals to him,3 of them in slams,yet you think 2 meaningless wins in MC and Rome is suddenly going to fix mental destruction like that? Get real.
Nadal won't win sh*t,so there will be nothng to drop.
Again,totally meaningless,and won't matter whatsoever in the slams.
Nadal is not going to win,and I am not doing any sort of jinxing rubbish. Nadal hasn't won anything that really matters in a year. He is not about to start now,especially if he makes the final to face Rolaids.
Except he DID beat him the last 2 times they met. I'm not comparing the form they are in in each tournament up til meeting, i'm discussing the form Djokovic was in WHEN HE PLAYED NADAL. Got it? He couldn't take a set off nadal and if he plays like that in RG Nadal will beat him without having to play better than his C game.
The first time Djokovic beat Nadal was Wimby 2011 which isn't even a year ago, so his slam dominace has lasted less than a year. You try and word it so it seems like Nadal has been Djokovic's toy in slams for twice as long.
Also it works both ways, djokovic lost to nadal in 5 slams in a row incuding the US Open which was on a surface that gives Djokovic the edge and where he had more experience, also lost again on hard at the WTF. So did the meaningless wins in masters tournaments fix his mental disadvantage? Yeah they did.
And your inabillity to even answer a straight hypothetical scenario question on what your opinion will be if nadal does win, shows you are either trolling or jinxing. Your tired agenda had some basis in reality while nadal was losing all the time but it's continuance in the face of him winning is exposing you. When he wins RG and you continue to say he will never win, it will be totally transparent.
It's a simple question, if nadal does somehow win RG will you drop this agenda of proclaiming he cannot win a slam/beat djokovic etc? You said he'd never even make the final of rome, so assume for a moment you're wrong again like you have een about 50 times this year alone.
I know you won't answer because you're scared you might have to actually stop posting like this if he wins.
