Lolz, you know by now that The Truth is the master of 'selective reading'
Who said an informed opinion was important anyway?! Nah, apparently Federer's style of tennis allows him to subvert normal human physiology. Even when he's playing 97 matches a year (2006).
I've only been a member since a little over two years and you chose to reply to my post.
:mrgreen:
Yeah I know.Roger went 92-5 in 06.Funny how we never heard of 'exhaustion' and saw these pity parties.
awww....Happy New Year to you too !
LOL there is no history there at all.You agree sometimes and you argue sometimes.Not a big deal for me anyway.It's just a forum for God's sake.:lol:
Happy New Year
Hmm...well I have no set definition of an argument .I'm okay as long as it's within the forum rules and mostly forget about it pretty quickly.I don't take this place so seriously otherwise I'd have had these cat-lovers on my ignore list and boy oh boy,would that list have been long :mrgreen:
I don't like Serendipitoustards.They're the reason bunnies get no love in this place.The only time they get talked about is when some evil folks want to make stew (*cough* underhand *cough*).
:lol::wink:
Honest answer? no.
I is Serendipitioustard and proud of itHappy New Year
I hope your new year resolution involves getting a cure for your Serendipitouslove :evil:
Funny.Now you don't mind the personal attack.
Funny.Now you don't mind the personal attack.
TheTruth and her ilk never fail to amuse
Sounds cool.Only you ,I and pretty much everyone knows you're lying.This isn't the first time you've shown a double standard .Your standards. essentially apply to those who rebut your contentions and don't take your rubbish self-victimization and not to fellow Nad fans.
You must be new here
Obviously you've never heard of Veronique.
LOL of course.
No,that bit is your friend.TheTruth is nobody's victim and yet she plays the part everytime she sees someone who'll counter her..LOL
Interesting.You announce two pages back you were putting me on ignore and all of a sudden ,in those two pages,you felt I was comical.
ehm what? :-?
.
If that were true we wouldn't be seeing double standards from you.You are only 'respectful' to those who'll endorse your contentions.If they start rebutting you,you go all defensive and accuse them of somehow insulting you and what not.And you do this all the time.
Now this is the most amusing part of all.
LOL of course.
Initiated contact? LOL.You give yourself way too much importance.I respond to whoever I wish.Does that mean I'm interested in any sort of contact with you of all people? lol,no certainly not.
So practice what you preach and learn to stuff it yourself.Or maybe you're giving me importance by actually bothering to remember who initiated a contact and what not.Well,I appreciate it
No,that bit is your friend.TheTruth is nobody's victim and yet she plays the part everytime she sees someone who'll counter her..LOL
And if you really didn't care you wouldn't have
a) felt the need to tell me or anyone to buzz off since this is a free forum.
b) felt the need to make grandoise claims of your morality and announce your 'coveted' ignore list's candidates all the time :lol:
c) Go against your word and respond to people who you famously dismissed to your grand ignore list
Interesting.You announce two pages back you were putting me on ignore and all of a sudden ,in those two pages,you felt I was comical.
1.
ehm what? :-?
2. .
For someone who so easily dismisses people to ignore lists,you seem more of a person who concocts stuff about people without knowing them,than I do.
3.
If that were true we wouldn't be seeing double standards from you.You are only 'respectful' to those who'll endorse your contentions.If they start rebutting you,you go all defensive and accuse them of somehow insulting you and what not.And you do this all the time.
Edit:
Now this is the most amusing part of all.
First she tsupposedly takes me off ignore because she finds me comical(and this is when she's supposedly 'sick' of me).Then she tells me she dosen't care what I think.Well,if she dosen't ,why is she sick at all? LOL :lol:
Atleast be consistent when you argue TheTruth.
Actually I don't mind that.Afterall I'm done training all-time great trolls like zagor and gj011 or even a wannabe great malakasYou must be new here
Obviously you've never heard of Veronique.
().Time to get in some practice myself. :twisted:
You're right here.I do need to get some work finished. :lol:
Geez,it's just a manner of making an argument,that's all :shock:
Oops. Never noticed it, since i never read her pedagogic, sophisticated, intellectual, didactic poo .. er .. posts.
I just think you get a little too touchy in arguments and I don't see why.And well,I find it funny
well passtimes are supposed to be useless :evilNah, if I wanted email addresses I'd be on a social networking site.
LOL of course.
Initiated contact? LOL.You give yourself way too much importance.I respond to whoever I wish.Does that mean I'm interested in any sort of contact with you of all people? lol,no certainly not.
So practice what you preach and learn to stuff it yourself.Or maybe you're giving me importance by actually bothering to remember who initiated a contact and what not.Well,I appreciate it
Then, what does it mean? Why would anyone continue to talk to someone who doesn't desire conversation with them? You give me too much importance. It's you, Mandy. All the time. I dare you to find one post where I initiated contact with you.
No,that bit is your friend.TheTruth is nobody's victim and yet she plays the part everytime she sees someone who'll counter her..LOL
And if you really didn't care you wouldn't have
a) felt the need to tell me or anyone to buzz off since this is a free forum.
It is, but when one constantly attacks others, it needs to be said.
b) felt the need to make grandoise claims of how 'respectful' you are,how high your moral quotient is and announce your 'coveted' ignore list's candidates all the time :lol:
I am respectful. But not with you anymore. It's not coveted it's for those who fail to communicate effectively.
c) Go against your word and respond to people who you famously dismissed to your grand ignore list
I told you I took you off and I'm going to keep you off. I want to hear what you have to say. This has been going on for too long. It's time to squash it.
Interesting.You announce two pages back you were putting me on ignore and all of a sudden ,in those two pages,you felt I was comical.
So what? I took you off ignore. You're off ignore, Mandy. Got it?
1.
ehm what? :-?
2. .
For someone who so easily dismisses people to ignore lists,you seem more of a person who concocts stuff about people without knowing them,than I do.
It was only people like you. The majority of the board is decent. What have I concocted? Stuff? What kind of stuff?
3.
If that were true we wouldn't be seeing double standards from you.You are only 'respectful' to those who'll endorse your contentions.If they start rebutting you,you go all defensive and accuse them of somehow insulting you and what not.And you do this all the time.
What double standards? You speak in innuendoes, stuff, double standards, provide an example, please.
Edit:
Now this is the most amusing part of all.
First she supposedly takes me off ignore because she finds me comical(and this is when she's supposedly 'sick' of me).Then she tells me she dosen't care what I think.Well,if she dosen't ,why is she sick at all? LOL :lol:
Atleast be consistent when you argue TheTruth.
Why?Because you say so?
I just think you get a little too touchy in arguments and I don't see why.And well,I find it funny
Or maybe I feel that way because I don't take this place seriously at all.I come here to follow a bit of tennis and for a little bit off pretty useless pass time :lol
Nah, if I wanted email addresses I'd be on a social networking site.
