World Tour Finals vs Olympics Gold

Tony48

Legend
Stats versu reality. It could be worth 5 billion points....no one seems to care when talking about goat. Fed won six wtf's.....it's completely ignored.

1) The REALITY is that a WTF is with more than an Olympic Gold. You cannot deny that.

2) NONE of those sources said that an Olympic Gold medal is worth more than a WTF. Those sources are comparing EVERYTHING. This debate is about "WTF vs. Olympic gold" not "everything vs. everything"

Your sources didn't even MENTION the WTF. So how in the world can they be comparing the two?
 
1) The REALITY is that a WTF is with more than an Olympic Gold. You cannot deny that.

2) NONE of those sources said that an Olympic Gold medal is worth more than a WTF. Those sources are comparing EVERYTHING. This debate is about "WTF vs. Olympic gold" not "everything vs. everything"

Your sources didn't even MENTION the WTF. So how in the world can they be comparing the two?

Because they don't mention the WTF . They don't care about it!!! Otherwise they wold say "fed has won 6" . But not even a word about this all "important " tournament.

Who cares about "points" if they ain't worth jack in goat debate????

Look this is a fact....every article and pro mention olympics as a factor ....they just ignore the WTF.....sorry!! But it's the truth . Here's more:


Fox News : Nadal could be the GOAT

- Nadal owns the career "Golden Slam," which is all four majors and Olympic gold, something Federer has yet to do
 

Tony48

Legend
Because they don't mention the WTF . They don't care about it!!! Otherwise they wold say "fed has won 6" . But not even a word about this all "important " tournament.

Look this is a fact....every article and pro mention olympics as a factor ....they just ignore the WTF.....sorry!! But it's the truth . Here's more:


Fox News : Nadal could be the GOAT

- Nadal owns the career "Golden Slam," which is all four majors and Olympic gold, something Federer has yet to do

Read the title of this thread. Read it carefully. And then read it again. Find a source that explicitly says that Olympic gold is worth more than a WTF
 
WTF and Olymipics are very different,Olymipics connect more about national honor.

In a goat debate it means a whole lot more.....as you have seen every single article and pro discusses the olympics in Fedal goat debate.

WTF is ignored.

This is a fact. Sorry to tell you this but it's a fact.

Go ahead disprove me....show me the plethora of articles on the WTF?

How many will to find ? 1 or 2....

I've given everything from sports illustrated to the times ...from Agassi, Mcenroe ,Sampras ,Becker.....you name it .

How is this even a debate?
 

Tony48

Legend
In a goat debate it means a whole lot more.....as you have seen every single article and pro discusses the olympics in Fedal goat debate.

WTF is ignored.


This is a fact. Sorry to tell you this but it's a fact.

Go ahead disprove me....show me the plethora of articles on the WTF?

How many will to find ? 1 or 2....

I've given everything from sports illustrated to the times ...from Agassi, Mcenroe ,Sampras ,Becker.....you name it .

How is this even a debate?

Your sources ALSO ignored number of slams. So I guess Andy Murray & Nicholas Massu > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors/Laver? Just because they won gold in the Olympics? LOL!

Did you just start watching tennis?
 
Read the title of this thread. Read it carefully. And then read it again. Find a source that explicitly says that Olympic gold is worth more than a WTF

Dude it's impossible to prove a negative. The FACT....that the WTF is not even barely mentioned in a goat debate....a tournament that Fed has won 6 times says it all.

If its not even worthy of being mentioned.....it's not important.....sorry.

When Sampras is talking about Nadal being goat and says "well Nadal has won olympics and Fed has not"......why doesn't he talk about WTF? Not mcenroe not Becker not agassi, not the times not sports illustrated ......no one.

And Nadals won olympics only once......fed won WTF 6 times......and not even a hint of a mention by these guys......come on!!

Again you can't prove a negative.....prove there is no Santa Claus....go ahead. You can go to the North Pole and look all around for him.....but that doesn't prove there is no Santa Claus.

The FACT there is no mention of Feds 6 WTFS is the best proof yo can have.
 
Your sources ALSO ignored number of slams. So I guess Andy Murray & Nicholas Massu > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors/Laver? Just because they won gold in the Olympics? LOL!

Did you just start watching tennis?

It's EVERY source in the freaking world. They ALL talk about the olympics and they don't talk about WTF.

If it were soooooooo important surely just one of Feds six WTFS would be mentioned in a goat debate......no?
 

WhiskeyEE

G.O.A.T.
It's EVERY source in the freaking world. They ALL talk about the olympics and they don't talk about WTF.

If it were soooooooo important surely just one of Feds six WTFS would be mentioned in a goat debate......no?

They didn't mention it because Rafa still had time to win WTF, but Fed missed his last chance to win olympics.

However, it doesn't look like Rafa will win WTF any more, so it inevitably will become a topic of conversation.
 

Tony48

Legend
It's EVERY source in the freaking world. They ALL talk about the olympics and they don't talk about WTF.

If it were soooooooo important surely just one of Feds six WTFS would be mentioned in a goat debate......no?

So Andy Murray & Nicholas Massu > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors/Laver?

Yes or no?
 
So Andy Murray & Nicholas Massu > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors/Laver?

Yes or no?

Does it matter? All I'm saying is that the Olympics is regarded as a factor for goat in fedal debate....wrong or right .....it is. Whether you li,e it or not it is.

By the same token the WTF is not.

Maybe they should regard WTF higher...that's a different point .

Bit the undeniable fact is that the WTF is ignored in goat debates in the media amd the Olympics is I. Fact considered unanimously as a factor for goat hood.

I'm sorry bit it's the truth.....whether you admit it is a whole different story.
 

Jeffrey573639

Semi-Pro
Does it matter? All I'm saying is that the Olympics is regarded as a factor for goat in fedal debate....wrong or right .....it is. Whether you li,e it or not it is.

By the same token the WTF is not.

Maybe they should regard WTF higher...that's a different point .

Bit the undeniable fact is that the WTF is ignored in goat debates in the media amd the Olympics is I. Fact considered unanimously as a factor for goat hood.

I'm sorry bit it's the truth.....whether you admit it is a whole different story.

So what Sampras and Laver are knocked back immediately? Let's not forget that Fed does have an OG and a silver for that matter
 

Tony48

Legend
Does it matter? All I'm saying is that the Olympics is regarded as a factor for goat in fedal debate....wrong or right .....it is. Whether you li,e it or not it is.

By the same token the WTF is not.

Maybe they should regard WTF higher...that's a different point .

Bit the undeniable fact is that the WTF is ignored in goat debates in the media amd the Olympics is I. Fact considered unanimously as a factor for goat hood.

I'm sorry bit it's the truth.....whether you admit it is a whole different story.

So the Olympics only applies to Federer and Nadal...no one else? LOL!

The fact that you refuse to answer the question is telling. When you apply this argument to other players...IT FAILS. Which is why you refuse to answer the question.
 
They didn't mention it because Rafa still had time to win WTF, but Fed missed his last chance to win olympics.

However, it doesn't look like Rafa will win WTF any more, so it inevitably will become a topic of conversation.

Omg......just twist my balls hard please. It would be far less painful.

Look the reason they ignore the wtf is unimportant,....you can have your opinion,

The fact is that it is ignored while the Olympics is focused on.

Therefore regardless of points money or whatever......the wtf is insignificant in goat debates in the media. That's a fact that even yo cannot deny.....


Otherwise go ahead and print all the millions of articles and pros that talk about the wtf...


But if you cannot then will you for the love of God concede?
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Not according to the rest of the world.

In goat debates Nadals one olympics is mentioned everywhere,


Feds 6 no where.

These are the facts.
According to most people who follow tennis, 6 WTF cups > 1 OG medal. My friends who don't follow tennis like I do still rank 6 WTF cups over 1 OG medal and agree that Federer is greater than Nadal.
 
So the Olympics only applies to Federer and Nadal...no one else? LOL!

The fact that you refuse to answer the question is telling. When you apply this argument to other players...IT FAILS. Which is why you refuse to answer the question.

It doesn't matter!

The issue is whether the wtf is more important than the olympics.

It's is not talked about in relation to fedal goatness or anyone's goatness ....not McEnroe,Borg Lendl.......NO ONE.
 
According to most people who follow tennis, 6 WTF cups > 1 OG medal. My friends who don't follow tennis like I do still rank 6 WTF cups over 1 OG medal and agree that Federer is greater than Nadal.

People who don't follow tennis don't even know what the wtf is!!, they do however know what an Olympic gold medal is.

Please stop .....it's painful.
 

WhiskeyEE

G.O.A.T.
Omg......just twist my balls hard please. It would be far less painful.

Look the reason they ignore the wtf is unimportant,....you can have your opinion,

The fact is that it is ignored while the Olympics is focused on.

Therefore regardless of points money or whatever......the wtf is insignificant in goat debates in the media. That's a fact that even yo cannot deny.....


Otherwise go ahead and print all the millions of articles and pros that talk about the wtf...


But if you cannot then will you for the love of God concede?

No one's twisting your balls mate, but you are having your leg pulled by the media hype train that is promoting Nadal as a GOAT contender.

It's complete baloney, but some not so smart people are eating it up.

In reality, an olympic medal is not important. As I said in the other thread, the 2008 olympics was just a generic decoturf masters event like Canada played in Beijing with medals awarded at the end. So it really adds nothing to your proven abilities or resume.

WTF indicates indoor prowess and the ability to win against the top 8 in consecutive matches.
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
Really? Sampras, Federer and Djokovic are the only "all time greats" since 1984? You're joking right?

and since when is Murray an "all time great"?

No, Murray is just an also-ran journeyman like Massu or Rosset, isn't he? Obviously the likes of him winning the Olympic title adds no value to the importance of it whatsoever!

Now, if only Federer had managed to win it on that day at Wimbledon in 2012 as he desperately wanted to instead of the likes of Murray. I daresay that would have made it a much more worthy title for your consideration, wouldn't it?

:rolleyes:
 

Jeffrey573639

Semi-Pro
Omg......just twist my balls hard please. It would be far less painful.

Look the reason they ignore the wtf is unimportant,....you can have your opinion,

The fact is that it is ignored while the Olympics is focused on.

Therefore regardless of points money or whatever......the wtf is insignificant in goat debates in the media. That's a fact that even yo cannot deny.....


Otherwise go ahead and print all the millions of articles and pros that talk about the wtf...


But if you cannot then will you for the love of God concede?

The media's job is very rarely to be fair- they typically just print stories that will sell and attract attention. Of course the general media won't sell the WTF- most non-tennis fans know nothing about it. The Olympics on the other hand is well known and widely respected.
 
The media's job is very rarely to be fair- they typically just print stories that will sell and attract attention. Of course the general media won't sell the WTF- most non-tennis fans know nothing about it. The Olympics on the other hand is well known and widely respected.

Ok ....but even sportscaster? How about tennis magazine? I'm talking everyone !
 

Tony48

Legend
It doesn't matter!

The issue is whether the wtf is more important than the olympics.

It's is not talked about in relation to fedal goatness or anyone's goatness ....not McEnroe,Borg Lendl.......NO ONE.

Nadal has an Olympic gold medal. Federer does not.
Murray has an Olympic gold medal. Djokovic does not.

Nadal has fewer slams than Federer
Murray has fewer slams than Djokovic

Federer has won the WTF multiple times. Nadal has not won it at all.
Djokovic has won the WTF multiple times. Murray has not won it at all.

Federer has been No. 1 longer than Nadal.
Djokovic has been No. 1 longer than Murray.

But for SOME REASON, the gold medal makes Nadal greater than Federer. So logic would dictate that the Gold medal would also make Murray greater than Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors

You still have time to answer the question :)
 
Last edited:

Mainad

Bionic Poster
So Andy Murray & Nicholas Massu > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors/Laver?

Yes or no?

Just out of interest, why are you lumping Murray with Massu and not, say, Agassi and Nadal? How many Grand Slam titlles did Massu win? :confused:
 
Nadal has an Olympic gold medal. Federer does not.
Murray has an Olympic gold medal. Djokovic does not.

Nadal has fewer slams than Federer
Murray has fewer slams than Djokovic

Federer has won the WTF multiple times. Nadal has not won it at all.
Djokovic has won the WTF multiple times. Murray has not won it at all.

Federer has been No. 1 longer than Nadal.
Murray has been No. 1 longer than Nadal.

But for SOME REASON, the gold medal makes Nadal greater than Federer. So logic would dictate that the Gold medal would also make Murray greater than Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors

You still have time to answer the question :)

Huh?

It's simple....really simple but you refuse to admit it.

Let's try it this way.

You say the WTF is more important than the olympics.

Fed won 6 of them right ?

So if it's sooooooo important why on earth doesn't anyone in the public eye discuss it?
 

Tony48

Legend
Just out of interest, why are you lumping Murray with Massu and not, say, Agassi and Nadal? How many Grand Slam titlles did Massu win? :confused:

Because his articles only mentioned the gold medal and not number of slams, indicating that slams are irrelevant when deciding who is greater.
 

Jeffrey573639

Semi-Pro
Ok ....but even sportscaster? How about tennis magazine? I'm talking everyone !

Then I'd be rather surprised if they didn't mention WTF at all and if that genuinely represented their opinion (that 1 OG>6 WTF ignoring Fed's OG), then I'd disagree with them very much. I was merely trying to say we shouldn't look at the media and say just because they don't cover it means that it isn't significant.
 
So Andy Murray & Nicholas Massu > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors/Laver?

Yes or no?

It's not a yes or no question because it is completely irrelevant.

Here I'll show you.....

Let's say the answer is yes....does that change the fact the WTF is not discussed anywhere?

Let's say the answer is no......does that changed the fact the the WTF is not discussed anywhere ?
 

Tony48

Legend
So if it's sooooooo important why on earth doesn't anyone in the public eye discuss it?

NO, you don't get to disavow your articles now that I have you cornered. Your articles have used the Olympics as the sole, deciding factor to determine who is the greater player.

So, is Murray > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors

(hint: I'm showing how worthless your articles are)
 
Then I'd be rather surprised if they didn't mention WTF at all and if that genuinely represented their opinion (that 1 OG>6 WTF ignoring Fed's OG), then I'd disagree with them very much. I was merely trying to say we shouldn't look at the media and say just because they don't cover it means that it isn't significant.

It's not just the media its also the greats...Sampras, Agassi, Becker , McEnroe.......come on .
 
NO, you don't get to disavow your articles now that I have you cornered. Your articles have used the Olympics as the sole, deciding factor to determine who is the greater player.

So, is Murray > Djokovic/Federer/Sampras/Lendl/McEnroe/Connors

(hint: I'm showing how worthless your articles are)

No they have not!!

They mention it as a factor....not the sole factor. They do not mention wtf anywhere .

Hint: your saying ALL articles and ALL goats opinions are worthless.

The answer to your question has zero to do with the fact that the wtf is just ignored.
 

Tony48

Legend
No they have not!!

They mention it as a factor....not the sole factor. They do not mention wtf anywhere .

The answer to your question has zero to do with the fact that the wtf is just ignored.

They didn't mention slams or weeks at No. 1 anywhere, either. Do they matter? Yes or no?
 

Jeffrey573639

Semi-Pro
It's not just the media its also the greats...Sampras, Agassi, Becker , McEnroe.......come on .

And if they said that 1 OG> 6 WTF, then I'd disagree with them very much just as I would with all the magazines which apparently don't even mention the WTF. And if we're gonna take the past pro's opinions to heart let's just end the goat debate, which this thread is clearly an extension of, with all the Fed is goat comments. btw I'm not sure what comments you're referring to, to be specific so do you mind pasting links?
 
And if they said that 1 OG> 6 WTF, then I'd disagree with them very much just as I would with all the magazines which apparently don't even mention the WTF. And if we're gonna take the past pro's opinions to heart let's just end the goat debate, which this thread is clearly an extension of, with all the Fed is goat comments. btw I'm not sure what comments you're referring to, to be specific so do you mind pasting links?

I do mind so scroll back or google them. Just google for example Sampras greatest nadal Olympic ....or just scroll back. You'll find it ....all over the net amd I posted it before.
 

Jeffrey573639

Semi-Pro
I do mind so scroll back or google them. Just google for example Sampras greatest nadal Olympic ....or just scroll back. You'll find it ....all over the net amd I posted it before.

I really don't want to insult you or get into the finer points of debating people but if you're claiming that no GOAT debates mention the WTF shouldn't you be the one to prove it or at least offer some evidence.
 

Tony48

Legend
Wow, so apparently The Dark Knight has been LYING this whole time.

I found his NY Times article (which he alleged "didn't mention the WTF at all), and here it is:

But there is one phase of the season where Nadal is simply no match for Federer, and that would be this phase, the largely indoor season that starts after the United States Open and concludes with the elite, eight-man World Tour Finals, formerly known as the Tennis Masters Cup, which begin Monday.

It is the only truly significant tennis title that Nadal has yet to win, and it is one that Federer has claimed a record six times, be it in Houston, Shanghai or London. That statistical mismatch also emphasizes another point in Federer’s favor. He has had to face Nadal on Nadal’s best surface a great deal more than Nadal has had to play him on grass or indoors.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/02/sports/tennis/federer-or-nadal.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0

Stats versu reality. It could be worth 5 billion points....no one seems to care when talking about goat. Fed won six wtf's.....it's completely ignored.

It wasn't completely ignored. You simply omitted it, hoping that no one would check the facts.

The Dark Knight now has ZERO credibility. I wonder how many of his other articles actually mentioned the WTF (something he says they didn't)
 
Last edited:

WhiskeyEE

G.O.A.T.
Wow, so apparently The Dark Knight has been LYING this whole time.

I found his NY Times article (which he alleged "didn't mention the WTF at all), and here it is:



http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/02/sports/tennis/federer-or-nadal.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0



It wasn't completely ignored. You simply omitted it, hoping that no one would check the facts.

The Dark Knight now has ZERO credibility. I wonder how many of his other articles actually mentioned the WTF (something he says they didn't)

So TDK is a liar and a fraud. How surprising. :lol:
 
Top