Blue Star.
Remember that one?
Good string
Last edited:
Blue Star.
Remember that one?
Beware of using oil-filled nylon on a cold day,Do you guys remember oil-filled strings? They broke quickly because you only had to wear through them a little bit before they broke.
I think that would be a great idea for poly strings. It would damp the vibration and wouldn't wear through as quick as the nylon.
In the 70s, I used Leoina 66. The 80s rolled around. I tried a new polyester called Leoina Poly X, and then Poly 7. I even did some hybrid jobs back then, using Poly X and the newer, thinner Leoina 77. The first all polys squeaked when you moved the strings, but for a hard hitter looking for control, they weren't really as bad as I've heard reported. I used these all the way up to the Pro Kennex Black Ace, around 1984 or 85. I definitely used poly in the Ceramic Ace. Other strings of the 70s--Vantage, Rayco, PDP gut, VS Africord, Prince Nylon
Ya, I liked it and used itBlue Star.
Remember that one?
Good summary !70s - Vantage I, Vantage II, nylon, Blue Star, or natural gut (lots of different brandings) - my favorite was PDP Rough Gut
80s - Prince Synthetic Gut (no Duraflex yet) the above, lots of "graphite infused" strings, natural gut & kevlar
90s - same as 80s, poly, natural gut, lots of choice in gauge
00s - lots of choice in manufacturer (everybody found out that .50 worth of synthetic string could be sold for $15)
....image of 33 foot roll of "Blue Star"...
That picture with the wood racquet on top of the Yonex demonstrates how much more leverage a wood racquet - with the sweet spot so much further from the butt cap - provided; hence why longbody racquets are popular. P.S. I think Shriver's Prince Classic or whatever it was called was a 110".Wow...that image bought back memories. Just noticed that it was made in West Germany. The pitch of the spiral on "Blue Star" seems similar but it seems as if it is internal to the string whereas on my black mystery string, it is definitely on the surface. The bulk holding spool was similar in diameter to the wood one (top left of your string spread) but made of blue colored plastic. I was told in another post that @Steve Huff could possibly chime in and offer some hints to the name of the black string.
Just dug up one of my old school racquets (383 grams or 13.5 oz) strung with a very similar string but in blue. Have a look:
The racquet head was 65" in area with a 18x20 string pattern. The strings are virtually immovable. When I first pulled it out, the head looked absolutely look tiny but over time (top right) it looked familiar in proportion...strange! With that as a backdrop, you can get a sense of the commotion that Prince (and Pam Shriver) caused when the 100" Princed Classic over-sized racquet was introduced in the mid-Seventies. The Yonex is just about the same size as that racquet at 98 square inches. Prince...just slightly ahead of our time
The racquets from necessarily heavy for power generation from the slower swings.A player named Vilas was a freak of nature and could really carve his balls with heavy top-spin. The backhand was a thing of beauty. My friend was the first to switch to the larger sized racquets and ask him what he thought of them. His reply..."Worth at least a point per game in your favor"....go figure
That picture...are popular. P.S. I think Shriver's Prince Classic or whatever it was called was a 110".
That is going back in time. I had a preference for the Slazenger over my brother's Maxply. I remember passing around a Slazenger with a hairline crack developed from errant wet weather play because it played so "comfy" before it broke completely.@RayPS97
The fred perry laurel! Was it made by Slazenger? Does it play Like a challenge no. 1?
Agree, the playability and flex of gut really worked well with the wood rackets. Impressed with your "after every string breakage, I would lightly sand the racquet and apply a layer of polyurethane to the top hoop." Great way to extend the life of a woody and cover up that ugly court rash.That is going back in time. I had a preference for the Slazenger over my brother's Maxply. I remember passing around a Slazenger with a hairline crack developed from errant wet weather play because it played so "comfy" before it broke completely.
The following info is from racquetmuseum.com :
It be hard to imagine a racquet with a representative RDC flex of "28" being strung with today's stiff poly strings as having any appreciable power. In that era, "mass was needed" along with the pocketing/elasticity of gut.
The "Laurel" was bought at the year end clearance from Simpsons mostly because it was stunning in its solid finish and construction. It played with more control and less power than the Challenger and definitely more durable. The post wet-weather experienced colored how I treated wood racquets: after every string breakage, I would lightly sand the racquet and apply a layer of polyurethane to the top hoop. Good memories...
Here is some more eye candy stringing options from Victor TAD DavisA bunch more:
Here is some more eye candy stringing options from Victor TAD Davis
I also still have a can of Victor "Staytite" nylon strings.Back in my junior tennis days I was on the Davis "free list". They would send me rackets and string twice a year. I still have one full can of Victor "Staytite" nylon string:
Davis racquets commanded quite a premium and often resided on one of the upper hooks, away from the grasp of curious teenagers. You got the impression that if you played long enough and developed your tennnis craft...you would eventually own one. That "StayTite" string looks very reminiscent of a string I referred to earlier as "Star Twist": A very slippery string with a see-through plastic look to it. Anyone remember that string ?Back in my junior tennis days I was on the Davis "free list". They would send me rackets and string twice a year. I still have one full can of Victor "Staytite" nylon string:
Yeah, there are some good looking frames out now. Cleaner lines. Less nonsense. Good performance, too. But how can a modern piece of painted plastic and carbon possibly look as great as a gorgeous wooden frame like a garcia continental, a maxply, a challenge 1, a vilas, or a tad davis?I just miss how pretty many of the wood rackets were.
Now we got all this poly rave, but in the 80s polys were bad and unpopular. What did those who could not afford natural gut used back then?
Synthetic gut and kevlar/syngut hybrid for stringbreakers?
Beware of using oil-filled nylon on a cold day,
Needed a pr,I remember Gamma Ruff- that was one of the more difficult strings to string!
I remember my stringer cursing me out (at least a little bit in fun) after I had him string up some Kevlar Gear for me.Needed a pr,
Had the same conversation with a stringer. Language became colourful. He was always smiling whenever I brought 17 gauge SG for my Profiles.I remember my stringer cursing me out (at least a little bit in fun) after I had him string up some Kevlar Gear for me.
Almost everyone my age or older from 4.5-6.0 plays poly.
J
there was nt sgut, because it was called nylon.I used leonia 66. Most people just used synthetic gut. People also used Gamma gut(the synthetic one).
Yes "patching" was more common especially for nat gut string jobs. I have many packs of natural gut that was made for patching. Today they would just be of interest for some collectors of vintage woods that want to patch and display that technique.there was nt sgut, because it was called nylon.
When you broke a string you brought your racquet to a friernd with a stringer and he repared it. He put a few new main strings in your racquet but did not restring your whole racquet because that was ofcourse cheaper.