Pheasant
Legend
Candidates:
Davydenko over Nadal 6-5. In this case, Nadal had the higher ranking in every single match. As a matter of fact, Davydenko was 4-0 vs Nadal on hard courts after Nadal had already become world #1 and after Nadal's first hard court title.
Blake over Davydenko 7-1. This one is shocking to me. Blake's career wasn't as good as Davydenko's. But he completely owned him in the HTH matchup.
Thiem over Federer 5-2. Federer outranked Thiem in nearly every match. But Thiem holds the advantage here
Krajicek over Sampras 6-4. Every one of these matches was played in a year that Sampras won a slam title. During the years Pete finished world #1, Krajicek was 5-2 vs Sampras. And none of their matches were on clay.
Stich over Sampras 5-4. Similarly, Stich was 3-2 against Pete during years he finished world #1. This is little less surprising, since 3 of their 9 matches were on clay(3-0 Stich).
And lastly, Santoro went 7-2 vs Safin. This one is a shocker to me.
Which one is the most surprising to you?
Davydenko over Nadal 6-5. In this case, Nadal had the higher ranking in every single match. As a matter of fact, Davydenko was 4-0 vs Nadal on hard courts after Nadal had already become world #1 and after Nadal's first hard court title.
Blake over Davydenko 7-1. This one is shocking to me. Blake's career wasn't as good as Davydenko's. But he completely owned him in the HTH matchup.
Thiem over Federer 5-2. Federer outranked Thiem in nearly every match. But Thiem holds the advantage here
Krajicek over Sampras 6-4. Every one of these matches was played in a year that Sampras won a slam title. During the years Pete finished world #1, Krajicek was 5-2 vs Sampras. And none of their matches were on clay.
Stich over Sampras 5-4. Similarly, Stich was 3-2 against Pete during years he finished world #1. This is little less surprising, since 3 of their 9 matches were on clay(3-0 Stich).
And lastly, Santoro went 7-2 vs Safin. This one is a shocker to me.
Which one is the most surprising to you?