RF_PRO_STAFF
Professional
Yeah this definitely helps. It's a good way of looking at it.This is where you begin your reference section.
I have a PC600, PT630, n6.1 95 18x20, UT, and V7 Blade currently sticking around because they are epic frames and it's always good to go back to them for a refresher on how great racquets can be. But they will never see match play again.
I also have a few duds laying around that I haven't been able to get rid of.
But when it comes to playing, it's been the EZ and only the EZ for a while. My argument here is that you have to get into deeper exploration to see if the frame really works for you. Once I adjusted my style a bit to what the EZ brings to the table, there was no going back. But that is not going to be the case for every frame you try. I took the approach of going in with my "main" frame and one or two challengers. If the challengers don't improve upon or bring a different aspect to my game than the main, then they went by the wayside. And really, you should expect most frames to not really compete because all the time you should be growing stronger with the main. There has only been one serious challenger to the EZ the whole time and as good as it was, it even got discarded.
I don't know if that helps or not.
I think I will let the UT, PMP, K7 Red, PC600 and PS85 rest a bit and let them enjoy a vacation. I'll still hit the UT once more because it's getting restrung now, and the K7 Red because of course I just need to try it once.
Using just the Yonexes for a while with the incoming VCP HD should temper my dazzling head and keep it a bit more simple.