AnOctorokForDinner
Talk Tennis Guru
Chirp away, folks.
2011 USO Djokovic vs. 2007 USO Federer is a pretty tough call. I think I might lean Djokovic here but 2007 Fed beats him if he plays like he did in the QF against Roddick. If you ask me again in about a week, I might go the other way. Or we could just set them equal.
Both are pretty clearly ahead of 2015 USO Djokovic, though, and I don't really see how one could argue otherwise.
Federer's shot tolerance was higher in the 2011 match than the 2007 one. In 2007, he was shanking all over the place. In 2011, he went toe to toe with peak groundstroke Djokovic. That shows you how well he played. I don't think 2007 Federer would beat 2011 Djokovic because of that, and he barely held off a Djokovic who was not as potent as the one in 2011. Now I give the edge to 2007 Federer over 2015 Djokovic because he played well, but wasn't at his best.
Pretty obvious it’s @The Blond Blur ’s answer. But 2011 Djoko and 2007 Fed are basically equal to me.
although if we wanna go by peakiest peak level displayed I think ‘15 Djokovic has an argument. ‘15 USO SF Djokovic was scary af, I think he delivered bakery products to defending champion Cilic in all 3 sets (but he wasn’t 100% to be fair to Chilly)
‘15 USO F Djokovic was affected by a) Fed’s hyper aggressive tactics which didn’t really allow him a foothold in half the rallies, either an error or a winner b) probably the worst crowd in tennis history and c) just not as dominant or aggressive overall as ‘11
Federer hit a lot of UEs in the 2011 match. I don't think the 2007 edition in this comparison should be marked by Federer's shanking.Federer's shot tolerance was higher in the 2011 match than the 2007 one. In 2007, he was shanking all over the place. In 2011, he went toe to toe with peak groundstroke Djokovic. That shows you how well he played. I don't think 2007 Federer would beat 2011 Djokovic because of that, and he barely held off a Djokovic who was not as potent as the one in 2011. Now I give the edge to 2007 Federer over 2015 Djokovic because he played well, but wasn't at his best.
*looks up the point distribution in extended rallies*
something doesn't compoot, hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
Federer hit a lot of UEs in the 2011 match. I don't think the 2007 edition in this comparison should be marked by Federer's shanking.
Yeah Fed was pretty sloppy in the 2007 match (though tbf he was even worse in sets 3 and 4 of the 2011 SF). He raised his level later on in the match starting from when he clutched through the end of the second set, but he had a very shaky start.Federer's shot tolerance was higher in the 2011 match than the 2007 one. In 2007, he was shanking all over the place. In 2011, he went toe to toe with peak groundstroke Djokovic. That shows you how well he played. I don't think 2007 Federer would beat 2011 Djokovic because of that, and he barely held off a Djokovic who was not as potent as the one in 2011. Now I give the edge to 2007 Federer over 2015 Djokovic because he played well, but wasn't at his best.
Yeah Fed was pretty sloppy in the 2007 match (though tbf he was even worse in sets 3 and 4 of the 2011 SF). He raised his level later on in the match starting from when he clutched through the end of the second set, but he had a very shaky start.
Yeah Fed was pretty sloppy in the 2007 match (though tbf he was even worse in sets 3 and 4 of the 2011 SF). He raised his level later on in the match starting from when he clutched through the end of the second set, but he had a very shaky start.
But it's not some errors. How is Federer 2007 'shanking all over the place', but in 2011 is just going for his shots? Even with Djokovic's level being higher, unforced errors are called that for a reason.Federer was going for his shots in 2011 and didn't hold back so yes he did make some errors but his level off the ground was great. Also, this Djokovic was at his best and is a player who is known for getting the ball in difficult positions for his opponents and causing them to either miss or give up a loose shot.
Let me guess, somewhere on this forum some poor soul have said that 2011 or 2015 version of Djokovic can beat 2007 Federer in a hypothetical match. The insecure OP decided to make a thread about it and to call his many Fed friends in help, because god forbid 2004-07 Fed losing a hypothetical match on this forum. Am I right, or am I right?Wonder where this thread came from?
But it's not some errors. How was Federer 2007 "shanking all over the place", but in 2011 he was just going for his shots? Don't see it like that even with Djokovic's level being higher.
But by the same token, 2007 20 year old Djokovic had SPs including 40-0 on his own serve in both the first and second set vs. 2007 Federer. 2007 Djokovic was clearly the worst of the 4 versions (2007/2011 Djokovic and 2007/2011 Federer).2011 Fed was one point away from beating 2011 USOvic and yet 2007 Fed, who was clearly superior to 11 Fed, is being argued to be equal to 11 USOvic?
It was a bit windy in 2007 and he had more pressure in 2007. No doubt he was the better player in 2007 compared to 2011 but he struggled to bring his A game.
Saying 2007 Federer in that final was shanking all over the place is quite a bit harsh.Federer's shot tolerance was higher in the 2011 match than the 2007 one. In 2007, he was shanking all over the place. In 2011, he went toe to toe with peak groundstroke Djokovic. That shows you how well he played. I don't think 2007 Federer would beat 2011 Djokovic because of that, and he barely held off a Djokovic who was not as potent as the one in 2011. Now I give the edge to 2007 Federer over 2015 Djokovic because he played well, but wasn't at his best.
Saying 2007 Federer in that final was shanking all over the place is quite a bit harsh.
Still a good played overall but probably not as good as some of what Federer has shown in other USO matches.Maybe a bit of hyperbole but he did hit some shanks in the first 2 sets.
In the mins of these guys Federer played 20 years and peaked only 4 years LOLLet me guess, somewhere on this forum some poor soul have said that 2011 or 2015 version of Djokovic can beat 2007 Federer in a hypothetical match. The insecure OP decided to make a thread about it and to call his many Fed friends in help, because god forbid 2004-07 Fed losing a hypothetical match on this forum. Am I right, or am I right?
Misleading stat and you know it because Fed was mostly number one when he won the majority of his hc slams in 2004-2010.Nadal had a lower ranking at the 2017 AO, which does no justice in this contextFederer is 0-8 against top2 in hardcourt Slams.
Peak Nole > peak Federer on hardcourts.
I fully expected Djok 11 > Djok 15 > Fed 07 to be leading the poll. I guess Fed does have a shred of credibility left here after all.