Ok, this thread has gone in many wild tangents, and most do not apply to my initial rant. Not that it matters anymore. But, just to be clear, here was my original "point" or "question", which was honestly lost in my sarcasm, and the subsequent USTA discussion (remember that I, the OP, don't play in usta leagues, so I was not commenting on that at all, as I have no experience).
Ok, so my simple question (which I did not ask in a simple way) was:
What do those who play WAY below their level (i.e. a 5.0 playing at 4.0; when a higher more appropriate level does exist) get out of winning/playing a match that poses ZERO challenge to them?
So, for all who said "you should be glad to play against a challenging player, etc, etc", ok then how about the reverse question to all you awesome players out there: "How much fun do you have playing against people at least a whole 1.0 skill level below you?"
For me, when I go hit with my roommate who doesn't know how to play tennis, I try to teach him mechanics, and we rally for a bit, and every now and then I get bored and hit my normal pace and he blocks it back over the fence. Now, would I go seek that out in a competitive setting? Hell no, I don't see the point, but this is what my so-called sandbagger is doing. So then, the question lost in my OP: "What goes thru such a sandbagger's mind?" Anyone?
That is all. Like I also said, I would have loved to have hit with this guy some singles, but it was doubles and they picked on my weaker teammate, who also was a substitute that day from 3.5. Seriously if you can break 100mph on your serve (which the 5.0 clearly could and was), does it really feel that great to rip em at someone that far below you? I just don't see the fun in it. That is all I'm saying. Trust me, I love tough competition and it's the only reason I am trying to move up off this team.