That's how thy fight "socialism and communism.don't watch faux but maybe check out the exposed skin...with the mute on.
More to come.none of those hold my attention. got any others?
Isn't capitalism great?That's how thy fight "socialism and communism.
'Cause that's what Hillary Clinton wears.You've posed the wrong question. Why do other news networks behave in such a sexist manner by dressing their female anchors and reporters in pantsuits that mimic male attire?
...to attract more viewers?
...to attract more viewers?
True. Even though I have absolutely no problem with female skin on TV and should probably be doing more to actively encourage it.I thought that sort of exposure was not allowed on US TV??? Especially a national news channel!!!
Where's the outrage from the moral majority??
Where are the 'family values' brigade?
Where are the old-faithful conservatives?
btw NICE photoshop!!!
First pic it looks almost like shes just wearing undies.
Is this a photoshop deal? That first pic looks too good to be true...
Is this a photoshop deal? That first pic looks too good to be true...
yes they are all photoshopped.
I guess so. I watch a bit of Fox News, and I probably would have remembered if I had seen something like that first photo...
Do any of you who bought into these pics when you saw them think most Fox News viewers are gullible dolts...?
why do people think they're photoshopped i dont get it
why do people think they're photoshopped i dont get it
It's a "Moral Majority"/Republican thing.
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/G1qAnx-_LmY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/G1qAnx-_LmY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
First pic it looks almost like shes just wearing undies.
...to attract more viewers?
The whole point of this thread is about how revealing the photos are. I wasn't using any fancy gadgets to uncover the deception. I just looked at them in a way any other red-blooded American would, and before I could finish saying, "I'd like to crack off a piece in that", I could tell they were photoshopped.The thing is, there is more than a grain of truth the idea behind the photos, so if one doesn't examine the pics closely and realize how revealing the photos actually are, they're kinda believable.
Um... Okay.Concidentally, I just watched SNL, and in some skit involving the news, one of the characters was referred to as something like "attractive blond Fox News correspondent" and she was wearing an outfit not unlike some of these photos.
Yep, like the saying goes; "It's a Fox thing. You wouldn't understand..."So obviously, this is a thing with Fox that many people are picking up on, so if one believed these pictures, I'm not sure that qualifies them as a gullible dolt.
The whole point of this thread is about how revealing the photos are. I wasn't using any fancy gadgets to uncover the deception. I just looked at them in a way any other red-blooded American would, and before I could finish saying, "I'd like to crack off a piece in that", I could tell they were photoshopped.
They're not.
In the video you posted, it explains that they are photoshopped. As does the description...
Works for FOX
2/3/2010
FNC – 1,540,000 viewers
CNN – 434,000 viewers
MSNBC –335,000 viewers
CNBC – 208,000 viewers
HLN –338,000 viewers
Wow, I knew Fox news was leading CNN but I didn't realize it was such a thrashing. More than a 3 to 1 difference.
Wow, I knew Fox news was leading CNN but I didn't realize it was such a thrashing. More than a 3 to 1 difference. Maybe that's why when CNN was covering Palin's last speach at the tea party they were unusually kind to her. I did find it odd but I guess they are trying to be nice to conservatives to attain more viewers and get those advertising dollars.