Here is the
Syracuse story on the Eastern Michigan match. It says that Syracuse lost the top 3 matches, and that the #5 player moved UP from playing #6 in previous matches. So, I am supposed to believe that their best player was playing #6 in the first few matches, which hurts the team at 5 positions and only helps at 1 position?
I'm no expert in this area but looking at the article and the players past records it looks a little grey to me as well, except for one player.
Vs. Eastern Michigan, the match in question, Syracuse lost the top 3 singles and won the bottom 3. Certainly on the surface that looks suspicious, but going through the line-up a little less so.
#1 Harman - Sophomore, All Big East in 2009, team MVP 2009, 9-4 Big East singles as a freshman 2009
#2 Parra - Sophomore, undefeated at the #2 spot this year, looks like there have been 4 matches, 6-2 #3 singles spot 2009, 7-3 in Big East singles 2009
#3 Tan - Finished 2009 with most overall wins on team, 15-8 singles, best Big East singles record at 11-3
#4 Peters - Junior, was not on the team last year, played 2 matches for Maryland last year before injury, was 4-10 at Maryland in spring season her freshman year.
#5 Sardinha - Freshman but was a top junior player, was a #1 in 12 and under. She was the one that moved up from #6 to #5 this match.
#6 Kalhorn - Junior and had team best overall singles record 2009 at 16-6, 10-3 Big East singles. Moved up the ladder to play #3 slot by end of season. Was 9-15 singles as a Freshman playing at #2 spot!...so must have bumped her down at the start of 2009.
So what say you? I would say it all looks fine till you get down to Kalhorn. You could justify Sardinha starting low at beginning of season since she is a Freshman and move her up the ladder through the season if she shows success. The others all look fine to me except for Kalhorn. Why would your best 2009 overall singles player, who has played both #2 and #3 in previous years be #6? She's only 5' 4" so maybe they thought no one would notice!?
In doubles they paired:
#1 Court: #1 & #3
#2 Court: #5 and Jones (Senior who did not play singles)
#3 Court: #4 & #6