Who were Federer's toughest opponents?

Ledigs

Legend
I should be studying for my midterm exam but I'm too nervous to study so I'll just post here instead.

Nadal, Sampras and Del Potro come to mind... but I didn't follow him in his earlier years.
 
D

Deleted member 22147

Guest
Anybody who he lost to and that's not many of course.
 

Markov

Semi-Pro
So the opponents he beat were not too tough?
Not too tough if he beat them :p Nadal has been the only guy he hasn't been able to dominate when it has really counted (I'm still waiting for more proof to be shown by Del Potro)
 
D

Deleted member 22147

Guest
So the opponents he beat were not too tough?

I don't know if you're a native English speaker but applying the word "too" completely changes the outlook on this. So far you've asked who the toughest were and now you're asking who was too tough. Same answers though really. The players he didn't beat were too tough and the players who he lost to were the toughest...because he lost to them?

You could ask who his 10 toughest opponents were and this question would be much better, because then people with any logic would only then start adding people who he managed to beat.
 

Ledigs

Legend
I am a native English speaker and in this sentence, I mean "too" as "very". So I am asking "So the opponents he beat were not very tough"?
 

dmt

Hall of Fame
1. Nadal
2. Safin
3. Djokovic
4. Hewitt
5. Roddick
6. Agassi
7. Gonzalez
8. Murray

slam finals only
 

Cyan

Hall of Fame
1. Nadal
2. Rafa
3. Parera
4. Rafael
5. Rafaelin
6. Nadalin
7. Rafito
8. Nadalito


Nobody else made Fed cry.

Hope this helps.
 
Safin on HC

Hewitt 03-04

Nadal 07-08

Nadal on Clay

Currently Djoko if he can pull himself together....i really dont know what his prob is

I mean the guy had a decent chance of getting to number one the first half of this year and is playing like a busted arse!!!
 

sh@de

Hall of Fame
Safin on HC

Hewitt 03-04

Nadal 07-08

Nadal on Clay

Currently Djoko if he can pull himself together....i really dont know what his prob is

I mean the guy had a decent chance of getting to number one the first half of this year and is playing like a busted arse!!!

Nadal 08 for sure, but Fed actually had a 3-2 winning record over Nadal in 2007.
 

ericsson

Hall of Fame
A fit Nadal is the toughest opponent, not only on clay but on every court, the very high topspin to Rogers backhand is such a difficult shot, even for the master himself.
hope we see the rivalry back soon...
 
D

Deleted member 3771

Guest
Nadal, though Fed managed to sneak a few big wins v Nadal when he was injured.
 

swordtennis

G.O.A.T.
Nadal, though Fed managed to sneak a few big wins v Nadal when he was injured.

Here we go again. 2004-2007 (H2H 8-6 Nadal) they were BOTH in their primes. 2008 Fed began the backside of his career. Nadal was raging prime. Still Nadal had to kill himself to dethrone Fed. So if you want to play the game they both are not prime anymore so any win on either part is legit.
This injury and sneaking wins thing is totally WEIRD.
 

pame

Hall of Fame
Nadal, though Fed managed to sneak a few big wins v Nadal when he was injured.

I always find your nick amusing, given your perspective on Federer. You do know that his one of Fed's nicknames in his teen years was "The Natural", don't you?
 

Anaconda

Hall of Fame
Nadal, though Fed managed to sneak a few big wins v Nadal when he was injured.

I could not agree more. The only reason Nadal lost 2 sets against Federer at Wimbledon 2008 was because he quickly got injured. However he recovered in the final set.



:roll:
 

swordtennis

G.O.A.T.
I could not agree more. The only reason Nadal lost 2 sets against Federer at Wimbledon 2008 was because he quickly got injured. However he recovered in the final set.



:roll:

Yes and want to bet the couple wins are conveniently the 2 Wimbledon wins? Not the smaller tourney wins. Has to be the two Wimby wins.....
;-)
 
J

Jchurch

Guest
Nadal, though Fed managed to sneak a few big wins v Nadal when he was injured.

When were these wins? How do you keep your green skin from burning?

He only won a single match since 2007. Nadal wasn't injured at Wimbledon in 2007. We know if he is truly injured he retires(AO 10). He was just plain spanked on his weakest surface at The Masters Cup. No injuries there. Wasn't injured at Madrid in 09.
 

JohnS

Semi-Pro
1. Nadal
2. Nalbandian
3. Kuerten
4. Escude, Nicolas
5. Murray
6. Canas
7. Henman (the first 8 matches)
8. Baghdatis (even though it's lop-sided federer has trouble with him throughout the match).
 

Cup8489

G.O.A.T.
Wouldn't it be interesting if we saw another Nadal vs Federer match soon? We've waited for far too long.

yes, it would. i wouldnt even care who wins. we've been denied for far too long. last one was madrid last year, and that wasn't exactly exciting.
 

Riosfan

Banned
Nadal and Nalbandian. Hewitt and Murray and Djokovic too. Might throw Agassi in there too. But Nadal at the top of the list. Fed still has a long way to go to level that head to head record.
 

The Edberg

Banned
I wouldnt say Murray, Djokovic, and Nalbandian Hewitt tough opponents for Roger. Nalbandian never showed up for slams so him and Roger barely ever met. Fed has had the decisive advantage more times than not over Murray and Djoker when its mattered most. Hewitt couldnt do anything to Roger once he hit his prime and Hewitt's top level ended around 2006 or so. Roddick is 2-19 vs. Roger. Pretty much a decisive walk in the park for Roger.

Outside of Nadal.. I dunno how anyone can say there really was a tough opponent for Roger
 
Last edited:

biaggi35

New User
Nadal, Nalbandian, Agassi and Del Potro. Safin defeated him once at the Australian Open but this was the only time when he was focused and in form in a Slam match against Federer. Hewitt and Roddick also challenged him a few times.
 
Top