Wishful thinking, JeMarI just hope the ten thousandth post isn't something useless...
I've done that, no problema.
I saw that video yesterday, what shoes is he wearing in it? His new USO ones?
But why can't Americans say Nad "al"? Is it really so hard?
Wow that's boring. I saw the picture of him using the exercise bike and he wore the black and lime, but that was obviously just for home.
So THAT is what he will wear when Novak hands him breadsticks just like in the Wimby final?! Cool! Important to look good even when you are losing baaahaaadly! :twisted:
So THAT is what he will wear when Novak hands him breadsticks just like in the Wimby final?! Cool! Important to look good even when you are losing baaahaaadly! :twisted:
Wow that's boring. I saw the picture of him using the exercise bike and he wore the black and lime, but that was obviously just for home.
Quantity doesn't mean quality. One out of two isn't bad, but I preferred both in order to deserve bragging rights.
Novak Djokovic jokes around with a gun pointed at him
By Chris Chase
A picture of Novak Djokovic standing with his hands up as friend and fellow tennis player Janko Tipsarevic points a gun at him was posted, then quickly taken down, from Tipsarevic's Facebook page on Thursday. It was accompanied by the caption: "How much $$$ would Rafa gief... ." (We'll assume he meant "give.")
As one Busted Racquet reader wrote, this looks like Djokovic's first bad idea of the season.
There are funny and creative ways to joke around on social media sites while toeing the line of good taste. This picture does none of those things. If the gun was fake*, it's a tasteless joke that makes the crucial mistake of being unfunny. If the gun was real, it's a breathtakingly bad decision on every level.
* I'm assuming, and hoping, it's fake.
The caption is more bothersome. The world No. 1 was part of a joke in which his friend (and fellow player) kids about killing him for a bounty from the No. 2 player in the world. There's a culture gap between Serbia and the United States, sure, but that can't be kosher in any country.
In other sports, that behavior would merit a suspension and a collective freakout from the sports media. (Imagine if Dwyane Wade and LeBron James were in the photo and Kobe Bryant was mentioned in the caption. I'm pretty sure Skip Bayless would spontaneously combust.) In tennis, it may not merit much attention.
That wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. Too many minor incidents in sports get blown out of proportion and snowball out of control thanks to an endless news cycle that needs feeding. Djokovic and Tipsarevic screwed up and deserve to be criticized for their bad joke gone awry. Leave it at that.
I posted the pic of djokovic with Tipsa holding the gun a few pages back. I didn't think it would catch on to the press but it did to some. Maybe it wouldn't have if Tipsa hadn't mentioned Rafa :lol:
I knew it would be more fun being number 2
CMM,
I know you're upto date with Rafa's schedule, is he not playing a 500 ATP event at least, here in the States ?
I heard someone in his team say he will go on Letterman or Leno. Hopefully Letterman. Leno is known as a bit of a racist.
Letterman is too rancid of an interviewer for my taste. Leno is better in my opinion. I'm not sure how you got the conclusion that he's a racist. Eitherway, Rafa is not going to go to these shows, unless he wins the US Open. And even if he did, I pretty much doubt he'll do it.
So THAT is what he will wear when Novak hands him breadsticks just like in the Wimby final?! Cool! Important to look good even when you are losing baaahaaadly! :twisted:
Quantity doesn't mean quality. One out of two isn't bad, but I preferred both in order to deserve bragging rights.
Training on court. I’m keen on starting the American tour, which is getting closer every day!
Not exactly news , but I watched an interview with him on YouTube, from when he was 15, and he says he prefers to play in grass and hardcourts rather than clay. Interesting, isn't it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib2DQLtCfCo&NR=1
Interesting since he is a natural born clay courter. Always has been and always will be.
But his best grand slam performance was definitely 2010 US Open.
2008 French Open was Nadal's best major.
Interesting since he is a natural born clay courter. Always has been and always will be.
Stuck in around 2006?
It is indeed interesting 'cause he's gotten most of his best results on clay.
Nope not at all. Clay is his best surface and where nearly every single title he has ever won has come from. I also know that he has defended clay titles multiple times but has never,not even once defended one off of clay. To me, Nadal has to practically be goating to win anything on other surfaces while he can usually sleepwalk his way to a win on clay(at least until Djokovic). Do you really think most people would say he is an all surface player,or a clay courter? Would you call Federer a clay courter,even though most of his titles have come on hard courts? No,you wouldn't,so why is it so bad to call Nadal what he is? A dirt baller.
What is his not defending a non clay title is supossed to prove?. Fact is: he's won them. Including both HC Grand Slams. Not much else to say about it really.
BTW:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#goalposts
Yes, I think most people would call him an all surface player. His having a better surface doesn't mean he isn't.
An no, I don't think anyone would call Federer a clay courter, but then, I am NOT claiming anyone would call Nadal a hard courter (if that's how it's said).
What defending a non-clay title proves is that Nadal is a threat all the time on other surfaces instead of being a straight up dirtballer who can sometimes eek out a win on something besides clay. He has to be playing insane tennis to win on hc/grass,otherwise he will lose each and every time. The fact that he cannot seem to manage to defend not even one title that ain't on dirt also shows that he does not belong in the talks about being a potential goat candidate. I mean,even Federer has managed to defend a clay title once in his career. Why can't Nadal manage to do the same off the dirt?
For the last half dozen years, Rafa has been one of the best players in the world on both hard and grass (clay is a given). What is this nonsense about he has to be 'goating' to win on those surfaces?
Of the top five ranked players, besides Federer, Rafa's record on hard is as good as anyone's. His winning % is .766; Dokovic's is .789; Murray's is .764; Soderling's is .649. (The rest of the Top 10 is even worse - Ferrer .593; Monfils .625; Berdych .545; Fish .600; Amalgro .448; Simon .608 )
On grass, he has the second best winning record after Federer with a % of .828. Murray is just over the 800 threshold at .803 and no one else is even close. Bottom line, Rafa deserves his #1/2 ranking and he's earned it on every surface.
Clarky is a Nadal hater. I am just waiting for the US Open to come around so I can see make posts about how Ryan Harrison and Andy Roddick have a better chance of winning than Nadal.
What defending a non-clay title proves is that Nadal is a threat all the time on other surfaces instead of being a straight up dirtballer who can sometimes eek out a win on something besides clay. He has to be playing insane tennis to win on hc/grass,otherwise he will lose each and every time. The fact that he cannot seem to manage to defend not even one title that ain't on dirt also shows that he does not belong in the talks about being a potential goat candidate. I mean,even Federer has managed to defend a clay title once in his career. Why can't Nadal manage to do the same off the dirt?
Lol. I am not a "Nadal hater". And Harrison and Roddick won't come anywhere near winning the USO. I'm a realist,not delusional.
Yep, because Nadal will be lucky to do better than QF at this year's US Open....right? :lol:
Imo,yep.
10char