You probably read one of my posts. My frames break at around 25 string jobs. I hit hard and I string tight.
However, I did leave a rather detailed post regarding how racket manufactures' take into account the basic idea that the average rec player restrings once a month and that their product cycle is on average 2 years. (See the math? 24 string jobs for most people would be 2 years... time for an upgrade!)
Changing the grommets and bumpers can have some effect, especially if you're having problems with frames collapsing. It can easily add a bit more life to your frame. Same goes with if you're a heavy scraper on the top of the frame. Ideally you don't want to have graphite exposed as frames are A LOT easier to break once graphite fibers are starting to show. (Pressure cracks and the ilk start to show up in worn down spots, usually.) With that being said, I usually change grommets at around restring 10 depending on how they look, then again on 20ish. Biggest problem for me is, is that most wear on my frames is at 3 & 9 from low volleys and hitting low slices. When I used to use the prestige mid my frames lasted WAY longer and I have to imagine that it had to do with the cap grommets, and probably because I wasn't breaking as frequently.
-Fuji
Except that throughout time the feel of the frames changes. Generally, they become much more flexible. Which is one of the reasons why Del Potro couldn't even switch to an identical spec'd copy of his original K-Factor paintjobs made by Wilson down to the paint. So yeah, he kept going with his racquets, but it doesn't mean that they still feel anywhere near new.Unless you are very harsh with your frames, they should last you forever. Didn't Del Potro play with just 3 or 4 frames forever. Imagine what his frames went through, string jobs every other day and not to mention how flat and hard he hits.
^^ Sounds right to me. The only issue I've had with my current racquets - Slazenger V98 - is the grommets are very worn down and there are no replacements. I just bought three new racquets and I'll only be playing on clay from now on (and I don't hit hard or abuse my racquets in any way) so I expect them to last a decade... we'll see.
I went through 6 99S in under a year. They all broke lol.
-Fuji
Didn't the V98 use the same mold as the Dunlop M3.0? Check with TW. Grommets are available for that.
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Dunlop_Biomimetic_M30_Grommet/descpageDUNLOP-DM30G.html
However, I did leave a rather detailed post regarding how racket manufactures' take into account the basic idea that the average rec player restrings once a month and that their product cycle is on average 2 years.
The average rec player re-strings once per month? Ha, I think half the players at my club don't know you can replace the strings.
The average rec player re-strings once per month? Ha, I think half the players at my club don't know you can replace the strings.
I went through 6 99S in under a year. They all broke lol.
-Fuji
The average rec player re-strings once per month? Ha, I think half the players at my club don't know you can replace the strings.
I know a material engineer who replaces his racquet every 6 months.
He claims 6 month use of a frame would generate enough micro-cracks inside to lose large amount of its physical properties.
I know a material engineer who replaces his racquet every 6 months.
He claims 6 month use of a frame would generate enough micro-cracks inside to lose large amount of its physical properties.
About myself, I have used same frames (switching between 3 identical ones) for a good 10 years.
I'm looking to replace them with new frames (and struggling to find a new frame though).
The average rec player re-strings once per month? Ha, I think half the players at my club don't know you can replace the strings.
Both JM Del Potro and James Blake, I venture to guess, hit harder than Fuji and their frames last longer.
Maybe 99S is a very fragile racquet, or Fuji has not told us of his racquet-smashing habit?
Well.
Wilson is laughing all the way to the bank and your pocket is crying, unless of course you get free replacements.
You probably read one of my posts. My frames break at around 25 string jobs. I hit hard and I string tight.
However, I did leave a rather detailed post regarding how racket manufactures' take into account the basic idea that the average rec player restrings once a month and that their product cycle is on average 2 years. (See the math? 24 string jobs for most people would be 2 years... time for an upgrade!)
Changing the grommets and bumpers can have some effect, especially if you're having problems with frames collapsing. It can easily add a bit more life to your frame. Same goes with if you're a heavy scraper on the top of the frame. Ideally you don't want to have graphite exposed as frames are A LOT easier to break once graphite fibers are starting to show. (Pressure cracks and the ilk start to show up in worn down spots, usually.) With that being said, I usually change grommets at around restring 10 depending on how they look, then again on 20ish. Biggest problem for me is, is that most wear on my frames is at 3 & 9 from low volleys and hitting low slices. When I used to use the prestige mid my frames lasted WAY longer and I have to imagine that it had to do with the cap grommets, and probably because I wasn't breaking as frequently.
-Fuji
I string for a former D1 player who uses the Wison kFactor 6.1 16 X 18. He gets about 4 sets out of PrinceSyn 16 with Duraflex and he strings at 62 pounds. Other than needing new grommets, his racquets are still very much playable and he has no intention of buying new.
I posted a few years ago about a female pro I strung for at a WTA event here. She used the Babolat APD strung with RPM 16. She broke two sets of strings a day. Her frames, and I've not seen this before or since, had been strung so many times that the paint was worn off at 5 & 7 o'clock where the string crosses the frame while restringing.
I kinda figured after seeing these two that a) racquets can be strung 100s or 1000s of times and still play and b) if they can't wear their racquets out I'm certainly safe.
You probably read one of my posts. My frames break at around 25 string jobs. I hit hard and I string tight.
However, I did leave a rather detailed post regarding how racket manufactures' take into account the basic idea that the average rec player restrings once a month and that their product cycle is on average 2 years. (See the math? 24 string jobs for most people would be 2 years... time for an upgrade!)
Changing the grommets and bumpers can have some effect, especially if you're having problems with frames collapsing. It can easily add a bit more life to your frame. Same goes with if you're a heavy scraper on the top of the frame. Ideally you don't want to have graphite exposed as frames are A LOT easier to break once graphite fibers are starting to show. (Pressure cracks and the ilk start to show up in worn down spots, usually.) With that being said, I usually change grommets at around restring 10 depending on how they look, then again on 20ish. Biggest problem for me is, is that most wear on my frames is at 3 & 9 from low volleys and hitting low slices. When I used to use the prestige mid my frames lasted WAY longer and I have to imagine that it had to do with the cap grommets, and probably because I wasn't breaking as frequently.
-Fuji
If you play 2 to 3 times a week and string under the manufacturer's recommended max tension and change out the grommets every couple of months your racket should last you at least 3 to 5 years with no problem what so ever.
Yes and I know guys still playing POG's that they bought in the 80's.
So, replace them when you wish or when they break.
Tell him to try hitting more shots on the strings instead.
So presumably if you have an aeroplane, car, motorcycle or bicycle made of carbon fibre it is scrap in six months or less if you hit bumps to hard?
I think most of us really really want to believe that a frame wears out much sooner than it actually does so we can justify buying new rackets that we don't actually need.
I think most of us really really want to believe that a frame wears out much sooner than it actually does so we can justify buying new rackets that we don't actually need.
i think you've got a nice nugget of truth here. i might go on and prove it because my current crop of yonexes (rqis 1 tours and xl tours) are going to have to tide me over until my kids are all out of the house!