mightyrick
Legend
Wimbledon match against Del Po in 2011, one of his more blatant and phony MTO's ever. Del Po was right to be totally furious.
Wrong. As usual.
Wimbledon match against Del Po in 2011, one of his more blatant and phony MTO's ever. Del Po was right to be totally furious.
Some logical argument is there too?Wrong. As usual.
Some logical argument is there too?
Federer at NO time was the same monster on clay that Nadal is and has been most of his career.Nadal at 19 had to face Federer.
No. But day in and day out none of those three were Nadal level either. Check out Coria, at his peak. His return was ALMOST equal to Nadal, and at his absolute peak he returned even more relentlessly than Nadal has returned in many years, but at no time did Coria ever put that return game together with the kind of service game that Nadal has.You think Shapovalov Can handle Coria , Ferrero and Gaudio?
the nadal ?... cheating ???Wimbledon match against Del Po in 2011, one of his more blatant and phony MTO's ever. Del Po was right to be totally furious.
How that worked out?Team World member to extend his h2h
An argument wasn't made. It was an assertion. Well, if someone is going to simply state an assertion, I'm going to give one in response.
Just like if someone says, "2 + 2 = 5". My response if going to simply be "You're wrong." I'm not going to bother providing evidence against it -- since I wasn't given any evidence to support it.
That has pretty much traumatized the Fed fans.Nadal at 19 had to face Federer.
Give it some time.How that worked out?
Got the total number of games correct. Watched the highlights and wasn't too impressed by Shapo's play. His game looks very awkward on clay. But whatever, he has time to grow. Maybe he can be a Wawrinka type player later on.Rafa will beat him in two easy sets (6-3 6-2). Not because Shapo is bad but because Rafa will play ten times better than he did last week. Normal clay reign is resumed.
He pointed out time when Nadal used phony MTO (not nearly the only time). Argument would be you saying why it was not. You, as usual, did not answered it (not in logical way). So you basically confirmed it.
Federer at NO time was the same monster on clay that Nadal is and has been most of his career.
Even most Fed fans will acknowledge that.
I always felt the Rome 2006 final could've completely changed the dynamic of the Nadal/Federer rivalry had Federer won.That has pretty much traumatized the Fed fans.
Thats why they are behaving this way.
Understandable. Rafa was a stunning beast from his teens.
the nadal ?... cheating ???
What say you now? I told you on clay young Shap wouldn't make a dent vs Nadal. I didn't see the match but the scoreline is close to what I predicted. Playing Nadal on hardcourt in Canada is a far cry from playing Nadal on clay in Rome.
he's the modern day LeConte
It seems Nadal is playing just well enought to be on top. Clearly not Beast Mode Nadal.
Pretty sure Nadal had just won a point and was actually leading on Delpo's serve when he took the MTO.Wimbledon match against Del Po in 2011, one of his more blatant and phony MTO's ever. Del Po was right to be totally furious.
Well, I still think it was a dangerous match for Rafa, and he responded very well. He won it early on, could have gotten in trouble at 2-1 in the first and really never looked back from there.
Oh really? Well, you're wrong, too.
He was never going to get in trouble from this 19-year-old, inexperienced Shapovalov on clay. It wasn't in the realm of possibility IMO.
Thanks for proving me wrong with your comprehensive argument...
And if you understand mathematics you would know that even 2+2=5 can be mathematicly correct result. But you clearly don't know what are you talking about. So thanks for "debate", I end here.
Unfortunately, 4-9/2 is negative, so we're not allowed to take the square root ...