NoleFam
Bionic Poster
Djokovic would probably laugh at TTW lol.
Oh I'm sure he would. lol
Djokovic would probably laugh at TTW lol.
I trust Djokovic more to beat Federer at RG than I do Federer to beat Djokovic at the USO. As I said, Peak Federer is better against the field at the USO but Djokovic matches up well against him there
Djokovic would probably laugh at TTW lol.
I already gave Djoko his due as far as RG goes mentioning him taking prime Nadal to 5 sets at RG 13.
Nadal was weaker at MC 13 than in MC 06-08. That's reality.
Yes, Djokovic matches up better on clay, but you and others exaggerate the difference when it comes to a prime Nadal.
I also mentioned fed beating djoko at MC 08 and MC 14 (including taking 1st set when djoko was unhampered). You gonna ignore that because its not convenient?
Wawrinka was not unbeatable in MC 14, but surely a clearly tougher opponent than Berdych in MC 2015 final. Djoko went 3 competitive sets vs Berdych in MC 15 final. You think that Djokovic definitely beats Wawa of MC 14 final?
Nadal was weaker at MC 13 than in MC 06-08. That's reality.
Wawrinka was not unbeatable in MC 14, but surely a clearly tougher opponent than Berdych in MC 2015 final. Djoko went 3 competitive sets vs Berdych in MC 15 final. You think that Djokovic definitely beats Wawa of MC 14 final?
I am sure these players are at least slightly away of the fanwars lol.Oh I'm sure he would. lol
What do you mean? They are 3-3Bizarre take considering their actual matches there.
I am sure these players are at least slightly away of the fanwars lol.
Weaker how? In the actual match or are you considering the whole tournament?
I haven't seen these matches since they happened, but I remember Berdych was a fine opponent. My issue is you using Wawrinka as an argument/excuse as to why Federer doesn't have a title there compared to Djokovic. That's ridiculous imo.
Who denied those were strong level wins by Djokovic? All 3 were strong wins, all 3 among his top 5-top 7 wins at AO.
Point is none of them were against anything close to prime level fed.
But prime fed would've been a slight fav over DJoko of AO 08 if not for mono.
29 yo old Djoko was losing to Istomin at the AO.
As far as fed himself is concerned in AO 11, went 5 vs Simon and didn't do well vs Robredo either.
His BH was a leaky bucket.
It was a good level match at best. Hardly very high level. Similar level to fed-Gonzo AO 07 final.
16 AO, fed played sh*te in the 1st 2 sets along with djoko playing phenomenal. Only a delusional can call that as great form by fed in that match
Bizarre take considering their actual matches there.
What do you mean? They are 3-3
Well there you go. Subjectivity is meaningless and the tennis played is just a contextless and vapid means to a simplified set of top trump attributes. Timing, opposition, the form of the opposition and all other nuance all moot and shovelled into the abyss. All future tennis broadcasts to be fast forwarded to 'game, set and match, X', prior to the streamlining process of the future where the tennis consists of mere simulations inside the BOAT matrix, running at Graham's Number matches per femtosecond to reveal which bunch of code wins over the universe's ultimate fortnight. That code is then duplicated and run in a perpetual simulation of BOAT tennis in competitive stasis, to be gazed upon by all objective tennis observers, truly satisfied at the objectivity of it all.The point is that it doesn't matter because it didn't happen, and it is totally subjective.
Well, there it is ''but none of them were close to prime level Fed''. It's his problem he couldn't overthrow Djokovic's level and bring a prime level himself. We can't make these excuses. It is what it is. You have to account for all matches they played and also consider Djokovic's own level wich was super high, not just pick what suits you.
I am just using it to my advantage.It's amazing how #20 for Djokovic has triggered certain section of Fedal fanbase
Over 10 matches at the USO are you going 7-3 Federer?Fed's losses were way more competitive than Djokovic's. The way Fed has MP's in 2011 and took it to Djokovic in 2015 makes it quite obvious who enjoys the matchup more at the USO IMO. Fed was good in those years but has several that were better and those were Djokovic's best runs.
The “Fed had mono“ excuse! An oldie but a goodie. I see we are scraping the barrel hereThe problem is Fed got mono in 08. And djoko would've lost in 09/10 to fed at the AO, but lost before meeting him.
Djoko has brought prime level himself only once from age of 29 onwards at AO for the slam - 2019.
I count those 3 matches (AO 08/AO 11/AO 16) while considering Djoko's prime level, but not while considering fed's prime level. Like I said, those were djoko's top 5-7 matches at the AO.
imagine if Novak reaches 21!It's amazing how #20 for Djokovic has triggered certain section of Fedal fanbase
Both have 4 finals at Monte Carlo. Djokovic converted 2 because of facing weaker version of Nadal in 13 (compared to 06-08) and Berdych(15) as opposed to Wawrinka(14)
Fed is also 2-0 vs Djokovic at Monte Carlo (excluding their 2006 match because djoko was young)
Also Djokovic is 1-3 vs Fed at Cincy.
Your comparision is beyond delusional.
Go and actually watch MC 2006 final (esp from set 2 onwards) and MC 2008 semi.
If Fed had a good dump before USO 2011 SF...Man oh man the luck gets endless with DjokovicThe “Fed had mono“ excuse! An oldie but a goodie. I see we are scraping the barrel here
Nadal 2018Let me know which one of Djoko's competition in 5/7 Wimbys is close to Safin of AO 05/Nadal of AO 09 and Djoko of AO 08(vs monoFed). LOL.
This is one of the best performances against a good Nadal on a CC. Go watch the GOAT do his thing.
Well there you go. Subjectivity is meaningless and the tennis played is just a contextless and vapid means to a simplified set of top trump attributes. Timing, opposition, the form of the opposition and all other nuance all moot and shovelled into the abyss. All future tennis broadcasts to be fast forwarded to 'game, set and match, X', prior to the streamlining process of the future where the tennis consists of mere simulations inside the BOAT matrix, running at Graham's Number matches per femtosecond to reveal which bunch of code wins over the universe's ultimate fortnight. That code is then duplicated and run in a perpetual simulation of BOAT tennis in competitive stasis, to be gazed upon by all objective tennis observers, truly satisfied at the objectivity of it all.
It's amazing how #20 for Djokovic has triggered certain section of Fedal fanbase
Lol in terms of debating hypotheticals to death, and stuff like 'peak level', when I read old threads I can see those debates have been raging here for the best part of the 2010s.I am just using it to my advantage.
Bruh 800 more posts, at this rate it's easier for the 'Why isn't Murray an ATG' to get to 3000Can we make 2000 posts?
If somebody bumps it up again and the posting rate stays high now it will make 2000.Bruh 800 more posts, at this rate it's easier for the 'Why isn't Murray an ATG' to get to 3000
Over 10 matches at the USO are you going 7-3 Federer?
Peak Federer is better overall and against the field. But H2H I think they are evenDon't know. Think it's pretty clear edge to Federer.
Not sure if 6-4 counts as a clear edge but then again it is still a 2 win gap.Don't know. Think it's pretty clear edge to Federer.
Imagine if Novak gets 2 more Wimbledons. All hell would break looseimagine if Novak reaches 21!
Nadal USO 10 final vs Djokovic USO 15 final?Peak Federer is better overall and against the field. But H2H I think they are even
Peak Federer is better overall and against the field. But H2H I think they are even
I think so too lol. Maybe ttw would be a far guess but definitely YouTube videos. I mean they watch matches and highlights of previous encounters to prepare for an upcoming matchup. There is a good chance they catch a sneak peak into the YouTube comments xDMan I'm pretty sure these guys have typed "tennis forums" on google at some point in their free time lol. They have to be atleast a bit curious about what tennis fans type about them.
Man I'm pretty sure these guys have typed "tennis forums" on google at some point in their free time lol. They have to be atleast a bit curious about what tennis fans type about them.
Beckerserve's and @NADALalot time to shine!There was a real photo of Djokovic and his team watching football on TV and Djokovic had his laptop on his table where the site loading looked absolutely like the momentary pre loading layout of MTF.
There was a real photo of Djokovic and his team watching football on TV and Djokovic had his laptop on his table where the site loading looked absolutely like the momentary pre loading layout of MTF.
What the hell. Is the photo still available?
What a match that would be. I rate Nadal's level slightly higher than Djokovic's but also think '15 Djokovic would have better strategy and mental strength (and crucially be better rested than he was in 2010). Would be an epic battle going 5 imo.Nadal USO 10 final vs Djokovic USO 15 final?
Not sure about MTF but I know that Jamie Hampton, Coco Vandeweghe used to have an accounts on TF...I think Coco requested to delete it once after she started reaching top200 or something...basically once after she became a known player on tour.
This was Jamie Hampton's account - https://www.tennisforum.com/members/38943-jamie-on-court.html
Wasn't there a pic of Nole and his team a few years ago with a laptop with MTF in the background ?
Only one proven MTFer is of course Djokovic.
He posted a facebook pic of him/his team browsing MTF
Djokovic was much much closer to his best forms than Federer in most of the matches. Fair enough to put Djokovic ahead at the AO but a 60% margin is very wide and I don't believe Federer is worse player than Stan Wawrinka at AO and I struggle to see any great being favoured over Federer at his best on HC to that degree.When you look at their matches played over the course of 8 years, it's about accurate. Djokovic dominated Federer at the AO. Well he basically dominated everyone and the only top player to knock him off his perch was Wawrinka by the thinnest of margins. The difference between Federer and Djokovic at the AO is the biggest difference of any of the 4 Slams whether it's sets 12 to 4, points won, games won, serve, return, break points, etc.
@RF-18 found the thread , but since they changed something with the site, the pic doesn't load.
Remove the - between tennis and forum and com, TTW doesn't want to link to it's rivals lol.
Peak this, non-peak that. Tennis isn't Dragon Ball ZLike I said considering how Djokovic earned his wins against a non-peak Fed calling them even is ridiculous to me but ok.
2-1 budNadal USO 10 final vs Djokovic USO 15 final?
Bruh 800 more posts, at this rate it's easier for the 'Why isn't Murray an ATG' to get to 3000
Mods, stop this.