Nadal 0-14 against Federer/Djokovic outside of clay since 2013US/2014AO

Nadal_King

Hall of Fame
This will soon change and I am damn sure about it, rafa has proven many wrong on almost every account and this also he will conquer.
 

BH40love

Semi-Pro
So because Nadal did not face Federer (who has not won the USO since 2008), the rest of the field was lousy? Medvedev was not lousy, he is the best player post-Wimbledon. Keep crying.


Lololol I could care less it’s just facts. No one brought up Federer or Djokovic but both of them have had rafas number outside RG for 5 years?
 

victorcruz

Hall of Fame
Lololol I could care less it’s just facts. No one brought up Federer or Djokovic but both of them have had rafas number outside RG for 5 years?
Cool story bruh, he still has 6 slams during that time, since 2013.

And that is facts. Just goat things :cool:
 

BH40love

Semi-Pro
Cool story bruh, he still has 6 slams during that time, since 2013.

And that is facts. Just goat things :cool:

“bruh”
The thread is about Nadals record specifically against Djokovic and Federer since 13/14.

301 weeks ranked no 1(most) , 20 major titles(most), 1231 wins , 102 career titles. Record 6 ATP finals. Just facts. GOAT.
 
Last edited:

steelcity32

Rookie
sure *****
What happen this year when he met Djokovic st AO and Fed at Wimby?
**** off wanker and go ravens
That's like you saying the Ravens should have beaten the Chargers on their home turf in this past year's playoffs. No s h i t they won, they have the clear surface advantage, just like Nadal does when he invariably eats them for lunch on clay every single time.
Enjoy your garbage RB that pretends to play QB lmfao, and your hard as hell schedule coming up while we take the division ;););)
And hey, maybe Fed can win Halle next year so y'all can celebrate something!
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
Lololol I could care less it’s just facts. No one brought up Federer or Djokovic but both of them have had rafas number outside RG for 5 years?
Federer has not the number on Rafa at the US Open. Their H2H at the US Open is 0-0. And Federer hasn't won the US Open since 2008, while Nadal has won 4 US Open titles since 2010. It's not like Federer would be favorite over Rafa at the US Open.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
When was last time Rafa bear Fed or Djokovic outside RG?
U can’t make this up seriously butthurt over someone else’s match.
:rolleyes:
When was the last time Federer defeated Nadal at the US Open? When was the last time Federer won the US Open? You can't assume Federer is the favorite over Rafa at the USO when their H2H at the USO is 0-0 and when Nadal has won 4 US Open in the 2010s while Federer has won 0 in this decade.
 
Last edited:

Sport

G.O.A.T.
“bruh”
The thread is about Nadals record specifically against Djokovic and Federer since 13/14.

301 weeks ranked no 1(most) , 20 major titles(most), 1231 wins , 102 career titles. Record 6 ATP finals. Just facts. GOAT.
102 titles is not a record, since Connors has 109. And 24 of Federer's 102 titles are ATP 250. So that stat is not that relevant.

Both the Grand Slam record and the number of weeks record are in danger.
 

BH40love

Semi-Pro
That's like you saying the Ravens should have beaten the Chargers on their home turf in this past year's playoffs. No s h i t they won, they have the clear surface advantage, just like Nadal does when he invariably eats them for lunch on clay every single time.
Enjoy your garbage RB that pretends to play QB lmfao, and your hard as hell schedule coming up while we take the division ;););)
And hey, maybe Fed can win Halle next year so y'all can celebrate something!
102 titles is not a record, since Connors has 109. And 24 of Federer's 102 titles are ATP 250. So that stat is not that relevant.

Both the Grand Slam record and the number of weeks record are in danger.

That’s your opinion and I didn’t say the 102 was a record. Those are all FACTS
 

BH40love

Semi-Pro
Pathetic. Fed can't even beat me at the US Open let alone Nadal.

You couldn’t beat a single ATP pro let alone me or else you wouldn’t be posting on this forum especially some garbage like that.
That indian boi Nagal would smash you everything you say irrelevant
 

BH40love

Semi-Pro
When was the last time Federer defeated Nadal at the US Open? When was the last time Federer won the US Open? You can't assume Federer is the favorite over Rafa at the USO when their H2H at the USO is 0-0 and when Nadal has won 4 US Open in the 2010s while Federer has won 0 in this decade.

Well he beat him at AO last time of asking. MAYBE if Nadal isn’t “injured” we will see them compete in the ATP finals. I’m sure u will discredit that since Nadal has never won
 

RelentlessAttack

Hall of Fame
This is why I always say that Nadal’s physical prime was over by AO14. Even though he beat Roger there he moved like garbage in that match, and we all saw what happened in the final. He fluked RG14 against a sick Nole but was again a shadow of himself, but everything he’s added to his resume since then is a symptom of the inflation era (lack of young elite talent to push out the older guys). Same goes for Fedovc’s 2017-19 results. Don’t get me wrong, he’s done pretty well reinventing himself as an aggressive player but this wouldn’t cut it against a young prime ATG just as it doesn’t cut it against old post prime ATGs
 
Last edited:

RelentlessAttack

Hall of Fame
Furthermore I would argue that Nadal’s prime ending in 14 is normal and expected. Federer 03-11, Nadal 05-13, Djokovic 08-16 are the physical primes with some room for argument. 17 on should have been some new player. 2010-on should have been a Delpo prime if not robbed by injuries.
 

BH40love

Semi-Pro
102 titles is not a record, since Connors has 109. And 24 of Federer's 102 titles are ATP 250. So that stat is not that relevant.

Both the Grand Slam record and the number of weeks record are in danger.

So ATP 250 aren’t tournaments? Ok 12 of rafas majors don’t count cause there on clay and nobody like clays. Even farther about 30 of his titles are on clay so subtract that and the all around performance isn’t quite there like Djokovic and Fed
 
D

Deleted member 744633

Guest
Nadal 0-14 against Federer/Djokovic outside of clay since 2013US/2014AO

Yet he is on the verge of equalling Federer's record. How the hell did that happen!
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
102 titles is not a record, since Connors has 109. And 24 of Federer's 102 titles are ATP 250. So that stat is not that relevant.
What idiocy. Do you have the slightest clue how many of Connors 109 titles were 250’s, or even lower type of events where he played only three matches to win the tournament? Try researching that and getting back to us on your findings. Anyone that claims a guy who won 102 events and thinks it’s “not that relevant” is beyond belief.
 

junior74

Talk Tennis Guru
Federer has not the number on Rafa at the US Open. Their H2H at the US Open is 0-0. And Federer hasn't won the US Open since 2008, while Nadal has won 4 US Open titles since 2010. It's not like Federer would be favorite over Rafa at the US Open.

Regardless of draws: This is the most surprising achievement this decade IMO. Just out-surprised by Anderson's 2 slam finals :eek:
 

Tshooter

G.O.A.T.
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
So because Nadal did not face Federer (who has not won the USO since 2008), the rest of the field was lousy? Medvedev was not lousy, he is the best player post-Wimbledon. Keep crying.
It's the sign of the times that someone like Medvedev can reach 6 finals in a row and be Nadal's toughest opponent in a Slam final.
 
D

Deleted member 744633

Guest
2018 Roland Garros champion/2019 Roland Garros champion in comparison to 2018 Wimbledon quarterfinalist/2019 Wimbledon finalist.

Duane ... your 1 line is almost like an illustration. Nicely done (y) While Nadal won his favorite slam in successive years, Federer failed to win his. That helped Nadal close in.
 

AceSalvo

Legend
It's the sign of the times that someone like Medvedev can reach 6 finals in a row and be Nadal's toughest opponent in a Slam final.

The fact that Medvedev in the last 2 months already achieved a stellar career when compared to Dimitrov, Nishikori, Raonic, Kyrgios proves how much lucky Djoko and Nadal were during 2015-2019.

Murray and Stan 2015-2016 also achieved more than they should only because of those lousy lost gen doodles.
 
Last edited:

SaintPetros

Hall of Fame
Why does such a major surface that Fed is supposedly a GOAT on get discounted so much in h2h with Nadal? :unsure: I mean Rafa reduced Fed to tears on grass,why couldn't Fed do the same...ever? :unsure:
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
As someone correctly wrote, Federer trolls deserve a 40-15 every year. Thanks to Nadal for losing that Wimbledon semifinal and letting it happen.
 
Top