I doubt anyone other than a couple of obsessed tennis fanatics online really give much of a sh*t about these worthless stats
You forgot about Mats Wilander.
Given he was the last player to do this 33 years ago I think that was implied in the OP's thread.
Weeks are much more precise. They calculate the ranking 52 times a year and not just once.
I'm talking about ranking.And Djokovic never had 19 slams
You get no handouts for high ATP points kiddo
they both have a slam where they have 1 title, and Djokovic has one where he's won 5, and Rafa has one that he's won 4. You literally have no argument.
No but maybe he can brag if Ned win a third Wimby.
True. It was just an example.Neither is a player that wins 21 AO's and nothing else
And Djokovic has had more walkovers than a cheap carpet
I guess it's kind of a compliment to have a lot of players too scared to take you on.
at least the Thiems and Zverevs and Medvedevs of the world aren't afraid of him.You forgot about Mats Wilander.
1) they both have a slam where they have 1 title, and djoko has one where he's won 5, and rafa has one he's won 2. you literally have no argumentNeither is a player that wins 21 AO's and nothing else
Which is yet to be proved.
On their respective second best and third best slams Djoko only leads Nadal by 1 in each. Djoko has 5 wimby to Nadal's 4 Us and Djoko has 3 Us to Nadal's 2 wimby. It's not a significant difference. The difference is just due to 1 slam that is wimby18. That is why Wimby18 hurts so much as a nadal fan. Nadal would have had same slam distribution as djoko if not for that dreaded tournament. The difference in distribution is not so much. On the other hand Federer's distribution is the best.
That tournament was one of the most epic slams in recent years.
and Nadal being so dominant at RG to the point where he's still only lost 2 matches there to this day, makes up that difference and then some.
Please, do not offend, but don't you find this clips somehow homosexual?
You mean green clay? This way it has no sense...
He def got called gay by some, but he's anything but. Every wrestler has a "gimmick" or character, his was a flamboyant boy-toy lol, but he could kick dat ass
But it's not proved that it is due to surfaces, strings, etc.
no I mean bluegrass
I don't understand what that mean in context of surfaces suiting Nadal, if that was your context at all...
I think there is a chance djokovic's distribution is identical to federer when he is say 20 but at 17 it's very similar to what Federer's was at 17. 7-5-4-1(Federer) vs 8-5-3-1
The worthless stats are the number of times Fedr has made QFs or won the coin toss just to fill up his resumé.I doubt anyone other than a couple of obsessed tennis fanatics online really give much of a sh*t about these worthless stats
That would be a great achievement considering Nadal has played half a season 90% of the time since and including 2012.
Care to name the player who has won 20 RGs and nothing else?
2 Wimbledons, 1 AO and 0 WTF is pretty pathetic for someone who's supposedly the GOAT. Even if you add the US Open (or more like the Berrettini Open) he's still got a total of 7 tournaments from 4/5 biggest tournaments combined.
