Nadal's 2010 season Vs. Fed's 2007 season....

[namelessone]

*******s logic: When Federer was dominating, the era was strong. When Nadal dominates, the era is no longer strong. hmmnn...

Of course, how else could he dominate?

 

[TMF]

You're right, it's the titles that count.

Last time I checked

12>7
8>7

(Mind you I think Fed's 2007 and Nadal's 2010 are on par if not Nadal in the lead. But Im just replying because you keep on insisting that somehow Nadal's 2010 is greater than even Fed's 2006 just on the basis of 3 slams on 3 different surfaces)

Yep. I caught him posting wreckless. The poll was nearly 90% in favor of Fed 2006 over Rafa 2010. Yet, he called everyone are *******s despite there's *******s even vote for Fed.

3 slams in the same season - done before.

3 slams in a row on 3 different surfaces - never done before!.

clean sweep on clay - never done before!.

Nadal 2010 by far the best season since Laver won the calender-slam.Even the biggest *******s/Nadal-haters at my club can see that, end of story!..

you guys talk about the number of matches lost and how many masters-1000 each guy won, thats irrelevant. Nadal achieved something this year that noone has ever been able to, not even Fed!.