I almost LOLed at this thread, because it's exactly how I predicted people would react to the Raonic upset.
Player gets an upset, TTW calls them the next multi-Slam winner. All according to keikaku.
I almost LOLed at this thread, because it's exactly how I predicted people would react to the Raonic upset.
Player gets an upset, TTW calls them the next multi-Slam winner. All according to keikaku.
I meant in the future. Wawrinka hasn't made it past the 3rd round since making the RG final. As @titoelcolombiano called his match vs Murray "Double Career KO"Well Stan has potential. I think he could become a multi-Slam winner and grab maybe 3 Grand Slam titles.
Based on what? Beating Raonic after losing to him 3 times in a row in Slams? Wawrinka is almost 34 and I feel he overachieved, so I don't see anymore Slams. I think he can have another good run in one or two though.
To be fair, two of these losses came when he has working on his comeback after surgery, US18 and AO19.
A well-playing Stan is always a threath in slams, there's no need pretending otherwise.
From RG13 - RG17 (the last decent Stan before surgery) he won 3 slams, made 1 final, 5 semi finals and 4 quarter finals
Those are very fine results in what some believe was strong tennis years.
I almost LOLed at this thread, because it's exactly how I predicted people would react to the Raonic upset.
Player gets an upset, TTW calls them the next multi-Slam winner. All according to keikaku.
Yes but AO 2019 was a year after his return to the game though.
Yes a well playing Stan but he hasn't been playing all that well, not even in smaller events.
I know his results but he will 34 in a few weeks, not getting any younger, and besides a couple of close matches he played against Federer and Nadal 6 months ago, has not showed that he will consistently play at the level he played in those years.
I don't think he'll win a slam, but I believe when someone thinks he can, it's based on his career. I am following his matches, he is making progress all the time and looks to be fit. His ranking has also made the comeback particularly tough, meeting top players in the first rounds everywhere, so he has had too few wins to build momentum on. Will be interesting to see if he is hungry for more. He has such a phenomenal mindset when he is tuned in, and that's why I believe he can still be considered a competitor.
He looks to be miles behind Novak at the moment (who aren't?), but the others are within reach, I think.
Please be trollingActually raonic beating wawrinka at 3 slams in a row should be considered huge upsets
With 7 losses in the fifth set, including AO13.From RG13 - RG17 (the last decent Stan before surgery) he won 3 slams, made 1 final, 5 semi finals and 4 quarter finals
I almost LOLed at this thread, because it's exactly how I predicted people would react to the Raonic upset.
Player gets an upset, TTW calls them the next multi-Slam winner. All according to keikaku.
Potential?Well Stan has potential. I think he could become a multi-Slam winner and grab maybe 3 Grand Slam titles.
Potential?
Stan > Murray and you are still talking about his potential??
The tour is so weak right now, peak levels wise, that it's entirely possible if Fedalovic, del-Potro (+ maybe CIlic, Nishikori and so forth) conspire to collectively have a weak slam. However, realistically Stan shouldn't really be beating anyone top 20 who can consistently get him on the move because as it stands it looks like he can no longer defend like he did at his best, which was critical for keeping himself in certain points long enough to get the half chance needed to hit a booming winner. If a player keeps teeing him up for winners and Stan isn't brain-farting then he's still plenty capable of beating top 20 guys thankyouverymuch, and he is a proven slam winner after all.
Will he? Unless he magically rediscovers the movement that's been missing for the last 14(?) months it's highly unlikely, so no.
Can he? Absolutely. If he manages to blast his way through to a SF and everyone else left gets a nosebleed from being that deep into the tournament, then yes.
I almost LOLed at this thread, because it's exactly how I predicted people would react to the Raonic upset.
Player gets an upset, TTW calls them the next multi-Slam winner. All according to keikaku.
Wawrinka is a player who did not mature tactically until late in his career. His problem was always mental, and every time he points at his brain he's reminding myself of that.The robustness of Wawrinka's movement was chronically ignored during his most successful years.
What people are forgetting is Stan got assistance from Fed's inner circle. So his knees are good and his age isn't a huge disadvantage with his lack of mileage.
I think his best shot is USO this year or AO-FO next year.
I hope he wins another Slam.I want Stan to end his career with more Slams than Murray.