I really don't think Nadal is as much of a threat to Roddick as Murray, Bagdhatis, Nalbandian and those types are. If those guys are on their game, they can keep Andy from getting so many free points off his serve.cuddles26 said:He wont lose in the 1st round. If he avoids Nadal or Federer he will make the semis.
alienhamster said:I really don't think Nadal is as much of a threat to Roddick as Murray, Bagdhatis, Nalbandian and those types are. If those guys are on their game, they can keep Andy from getting so many free points off his serve.
Is the grass of wimbledon, in its current form, his worst surface? He's done pretty terribly on the Cincy and US Open surfaces, so I don't expect him to go very deep this year.cuddles26 said:Nadal reached the Wimbledon final on his worst surface by far. I am not going to undermine his chances on a fast hard court just yet.
alienhamster said:Is the grass of wimbledon, in its current form, his worst surface? He's done pretty terribly on the Cincy and US Open surfaces, so I don't expect him to go very deep this year.
But you're right: he's a great player who can adapt his game to non-clay surfaces.
Even so, Roddick has the kind of game that can bother Nadal since he strikes so early in the rally. So I see these other guys and Fed being more of a problem for him on this surface.
TacoBellBorderBowl1946 said:hell no, I believe he will be a finalist if hes on Feds opposite half or winner if Fed gets knocked out. I pretty much believe now he can beat anyone on tour not named Roger.
TacoBellBorderBowl1946 said:A Roddick-Federer rivalry is much more exciting to watch than a Nadal-Federer rivalry. In the first, both guys have game and a big serve. In the latter, one can play and the other just grinds it out.