Vortex Tour 95
Rookie
Personally I don't think so. He is to stubborn to just retire when he is on top.
And by the way Sampras was only 31 when he won 2002 USO, his last slam. Aggasi was almost two years older when he won 2003 AO.
Ken Rosewall is the oldest GS Champion. He won the US Open at 35 and the Australian Open at 37.
Ken Rosewall was 37 when he won the 1972 Australian Open.
No one is beating that record....if the gameplay is as physical as it is now!
The AO was not a real grandslam back then. Most of the top ten would not even to bother to show up.
Borg only appeared once
Connors only appeared twice
McEnroe I believe rarely showed up.
But you are technically right.
I wouldnt say no One. most TW members think they can beat the likes of Nadal and Federer.
AO not a real slam?
Back then it wasn't even a good tournament .
When you have the top players not even showing up how can you call it a slam?
Imagine of Nadal, Fed, Djokovic, amd murray all skipped a slam year after year because it wasn't worth their time.
The only way a 40 year old could win a slam now is if they changed the racket regulations so everyone had to use an 85" racket or smaller or a wooden racket. In that case Sampras would unretire and win WImbledon.
Are you Bridgette Wilson? Only someone who is sleeping with Sampras can be this delusional.
Back then it wasn't even a good tournament .
When you have the top players not even showing up how can you call it a slam?
Imagine of Nadal, Fed, Djokovic, amd murray all skipped a slam year after year because it wasn't worth their time.
If Fed is still winning slams at 33, then I f**king quit
And by the way Sampras was only 31 when he won 2002 USO, his last slam. Aggasi was almost two years older when he won 2003 AO.
An entire decade is some "eb"
But it really was nothing for about 30 years which is an even bigger "eb".
Today however it is a true grand slam.
Ken Rosewall is the oldest GS Champion. He won the US Open at 35 and the Australian Open at 37.