OTMPut
Hall of Fame
Austin looks prepubescent, while Evert looks quite the opposite��
Some nice backhands and volleys she played with that 400gm racquet.
Grown men now complain if the racquet weights more than 315gm.
Austin looks prepubescent, while Evert looks quite the opposite��
Some nice backhands and volleys she played with that 400gm racquet.
Grown men now complain if the racquet weights more than 315gm.
I've actually been up close to a bunch of WTA players including Petra, and they are way leaner and fitter than TV distorts, and I'd conservatively say 90% of you would love to have a wife or Girlfriend HALF as fit as them!
EVERYTHING is worse today. Microwaves make the food taste worse than ovens. MP3s sound worse than CDs. Cars have little feel. Movies are crap. You can't sleep on today's mattresses. Fallon is worse than Leno. Texting is a poor substitute for hearing someone's voice..you get the idea.
At least Petra attacks somewhat and takes advantage of that left handed slider on the grass. Bouchard is just a Babolat baseline ball basher.
?..
Grown men now complain if the racquet weights more than 315gm.
Kvitova is a talented shotmaker. It's too bad she had to face the overhyped scrub in the final. The real final was R3 vs Venus
At least Petra attacks somewhat and takes advantage of that left handed slider on the grass. Bouchard is just a Babolat baseline ball basher.
I might have to take this to the useless information thread, but did you guys know gisele bundchen was once romantically linked to a certain tennis legend from brazil?So have I...
Yeah, it's all TV. In person, Petra has the face of Gisele Bundchen and the body of Steffi Graf.
+1
That was a great match up.
I don't have a problem with the way our new champ played today. She played big time tennis. I find it a tad unfair for the OP to insinuate that it's somehow easy to consistently hit winners like that all match long. It simply isn't. I preferred watching her match with big time shot making that a mens match with 50+ aces.
KL
LOL. Their second serves are slower than mine.
BTW, why was Evert allowed to wear a shirt that is almost half not white?
Lol at Tracy Austin's Shirley Temple dress (with the big blue bow at the back) and her pigtails and braces!
It's just tennis from a completely different era. No power serving, slow, methodical groundstokes, long baseline rallies (didn't see much S & V in either match). Quaint and interesting to watch but not in any way 'superior' to what is played today IMO!
The game evolves and moves on. Players evolve and move on. Different styles for different eras. Each good and appropriate for their own particular time-frame.
So stop wallowing in the past!. As some wag once pointed out (I forget who):
"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be!"
Sometimes I wish you would stop being so diplomatic and PC about everything.
Sometimes I wish you would stop being so diplomatic and PC about everything.
haahah that was awesome...
So I just watched the Wimbledon women's final and it was just ridiculous! Just two players blasting the ball at each other. These modern racquets have destroyed the beautiful sport of tennis. Gone are the strategy, point construction, finesse, touch, guile, etc. Now the entire strategy is just to hit the ball as hard as you can on every shot. Kvitova hit some shots that she had no business hitting. Give her a wood racquet and no way does she come close at hitting those kind of shots.
Tennis is supposed to like chess on a big board. A cerebral game. Now it's like nothing but a shoot 'em up video game. It's disgusting! If you want to play a video game, get yourself an Xbox. Tennis is supposed to be mano-a-mano using only your natural abilities with nothing to aid you. Today's tennis is like allowing boxers to bring weapons into the ring. Wouldn't that also ruin the sport of boxing?
This has gone way too far for too long. It's like allowing the players to bring AK-47's onto the court to blast each other away. Wood racquets were the closest thing to having no weapons at all. Tennis should be all you and you being the only only weapon. Tennis was never invented to be played the way it is today. Or else they would have made the court smaller and the net higher.
This is the way tennis was meant to be played: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0uoVeHmsIw
End of rant.
Spoken like a true aficionado of the game. :roll:Are you for real...that is the most god awful UN-exciting Krap I've ever watched...it's like watching the middle aged chicks at the local park. Thanks god the powers that be are not old fashioned Luddites like you or I'd hate tennis.
Here's a clue..Martina rocked out because she was an ATHLETE in an era where they were RARE...now all the girls are ATHLETES...so you can't get away with the slow paced rinky dink patty cake krap you crave...you'll be crushed...ask AGA!
Why are you so bitter about the modern fast paced hard hitting game...ahhh...do the college kids down at the park blow you off the court?
Yes, it takes so much brains to try and whack a winner on every ball. I'd bet she has an IQ that surpasses even Einstein.She does own indoor tourneys....yes, she never see's a reason to not wack at a winner..win or lose..love it!
Other than the fact you shouldn't give a toss about WTA, I feel you aren't being realistic enough.
Serena Williams when asked whether she would play Andy Murray laughed and replied; 'the women's game is JUST another entirely, completely different sport'
...and I think here in-lies the problem. WTA is and always has been about exposing the weak serve of your opponent. So if you have a big serve and can get good from practise at bashing returns, you're essentially with the potential to be a top, top player.
Kvitova obviously showed a little more than that today, so props, but generally that is how it goes.
They're a bunch of Barthel's, Hampton's, Cirstea's. Wreckless, aimless ball-bashers . There are odd suprises like Justine Henin and company but it's rare.
A lot of the coaches for WTA are churning out these players that;s entire game is to bash on the front-foot. The WTA second serve is a joke. Even Bocuhard who's a ridiculous talent, lacks a slice serve for grass. Who else? Kerber. lol Then there's Jovanvoski's weak second serve ... Azarenka's ... Makarova's ... that's why I say most of the WTA contests hinge on how well they return the second serve and how much they can capitalise on it. There's very few baseline exchanges at these premier events.... slams is different, coz we see the best of the best in the latter stages.
However at mid-ranked level we do see more point construction - Though I personally don't find toddler, moonballing, ball-absorbing tennis between the likes of Errani, Vinci, Radwanska and say Wozniacki much fun to watch either.
Just cancel the WTA tour out from your mind man and quit being so 'elitist' with your idea of what is 'good' tennis. Unless you wanna diss Raonic the serving robotic dullard.
Side-note: Caroline Garcia, Bouchard, Halep and co are a breathe of fresh air for that tour which has been dead for many years since Henin's retirement.
Ha ha ha Exactly!Some nice backhands and volleys she played with that 400gm racquet.
Grown men now complain if the racquet weights more than 315gm.
Ha ha ha Exactly!
It'd be funny as heck to take away today's grown men's APD and put a wood racquet in their hands and watch them cry. What? You actually need skill and strength to play tennis? :lol: LOL
So you think Evert is stronger and has more advanced technique than Nadal and Djokovic? The racquet technology has made the use of BETTER (more sophisticated) technique possible, as well as unlocked the ability to actually use your full strength when playing tennis. There is a reason all players spend far more time in the gym these days than they did in the 70's.
you must be confused
its obvious some on this forum are obsessed with ballerina aesthetics and therefore love players like Henin and Federer; but how does Bouchard or Garcia replicate such
perhaps Halep, but Bouchard's game is not 'pretty' at all. it can be effective, although it certainly wasn't today...
What point construction? This is grass court tennis,and most of the rallies were 4 or less shots. What did you expect,they're not playing on clay...Did you see any point construction in her game? If you did, you have better eyes than I do.
WTA became unwatchable with Henin's retirement.
Garcia definitely has that air of 'magnifeeeeeeek' touch and creative class every french player has.
Bouchard is exciting, she takes the ball early on the front-foot and clocks off winners. How can you not enjoy winners being struck deliciously? She has sexay passing shots up-the-line too.
I honestly don't get the distaste for Bouchard. Is it because she's well-spoken and from an upper middle-class family background or what? I don't find her game generic, her techniques generic? If anything Djokovic's techniques are generic, but to a high level, just like Bouchard. So why are people reveling in her loss.
It's not as if she's playing the errani / nadal style 5 meter badminton net-clearance with heavy topspin game?
Very confused.
Garcia definitely has that air of 'magnifeeeeeeek' touch and creative class every french player has.
Bouchard is exciting, she takes the ball early on the front-foot and clocks off winners. How can you not enjoy winners being struck deliciously? She has sexay passing shots up-the-line too.
I honestly don't get the distaste for Bouchard. Is it because she's well-spoken and from an upper middle-class family background or what? I don't find her game generic, her techniques generic? If anything Djokovic's techniques are generic, but to a high level, just like Bouchard. So why are people reveling in her loss.
It's not as if she's playing the errani / nadal style 5 meter badminton net-clearance with heavy topspin game?
Very confused.
Then how come so many pros today can't even handle 13 oz. racquets, let alone the 14 oz and 15 oz wood racquets that the pros used to use. Don Budge used a 16 oz. wood racquet. If you want to see a grown man cry, take away his 11 oz. APD and give him a 16 oz. wood racquet. LOLSo you think Evert is stronger and has more advanced technique than Nadal and Djokovic? The racquet technology has made the use of BETTER (more sophisticated) technique possible, as well as unlocked the ability to actually use your full strength when playing tennis. There is a reason all players spend far more time in the gym these days than they did in the 70's.
Not exactly interested in resurrecting the pure serve and volley game that the pros were using when I was a kid, but its absence is part of the problem with the WTA. The final today was a bit of a dud because this rising star from Montreal played a one-dimensional game and nothing else.
Genie tried to outslug Petra from the baseline and she lost the first set. What did she do? More of the same... no sign of anything close to a "Plan B". We've been watching the same procession of WTA underlings marching straight into the loss column against Maria, Serena, etc. for YEARS! At least for me, the definition of insanity has taken up residence in the WTA.
Andy Roddick won the US Open early on, but then got passed up by a generation of all-courters. Only later in his career when Larry Stefanki squared him away (in terms of his all-court skills) was he capable of that instant classic of a final at Wimbledon in '09 against Federer. Nadal began winning away from the red clay as he developed more dimension in his game. Some years back, Djokovic hired doubles great Mark Woodford (sp?) for a stretch and has Becker coaching him now... probably not for helping with his baseline game. Fed only has perhaps the greatest serve and volleyer of all time as his current coach. No mystery here.
Aggie Radwanska is currently the number four player in the world, but she does everything other than baseline crushing. Case closed. The men's game went through its phase of predominate power baselining years ago and has evolved beyond that. What's been nauseating for me (and maybe for BP, too) has been the wait for a long overdue generation of ladies with more complete skill sets to take over. Today's final offered no signs of that wait coming to an end.
Yup, excellent post.This nostalgia thing never ends. In 30 years time when players are playing with racquets which have sensors built into the strings to read the sensors built into the ball so they can self-adjust their tension in accordance with how the ball is spinning and its trajectory, all the turds who today argue that today's is the best way will be calling for an end to technology and that it should get back to the way things were in the 2010s.
Most of you idiots have totally missed the OPs point. His point is that technology has made the players of today better than they really are. In the end it all evens out because every player has access to the same technology. But the person who loses is the spectator. The spectator is now subjected to one style of game, watching good players appear like great players and, as the OP said, robbed the game of its tactical component.
I'm not suggesting a throwback to the Evert Austin days, but a balance between what it once was and what it is now needs to be struck. Aside from the spectator, the biggest loser in the sport is the sport itself. It was once considered a multidimensional game with contrasting styles. Now it's become table tennis, just repetitive and one dimensional.
The OP used the wrong analogy to convey his point, but I get his point. The analogy I would use is an average singer who sings into a microphone which has the technology to make the output, ie what the audience hears, seem like an opera concert, technology that opera singers in bygone eras didn't have.
Bouchard has done nothing objectionable in my opinion. She seems like a future champion. I think some of the pushback against her on these boards is due to sexism and the fact that she's attractive. Guys here get bent out of shape because she's confident, playing professional tennis and they would have zero chance with her even if she wasn't famous ha! Just my "two cents." These boards are the pits these days.
i actually picked Bouchard to win in 3, although i said that if Kivitova were to play her best she would win easily.
i don't have distaste for Bouchard, i just don't think her game is pretty at all (like a female Courier), which i thought you were alluding to with your Henin reference.
Bouchard does take the ball very early (even earlier than Azeranka) and can dictate especially off the BH. but when faced with so much power like she was today she did not hit the ball cleanly at all. she also does not have any plan B yet, such as changing the pace, using slice, etc. plus her serve needs work. but, i think she will win a slam one day...
I don't get it. If there's sexism? They shouldn't be watching the WTA at all, period?
Ohhhhh ... I;m with you now, from the bolded part. lol That is quite the petty, pathetic juvenile nonsense right there. LOL!
Basically - 'We hate you because you look like the girl we got rejected by in school - As nerds we UNITE'
LOL! Sad, pathetic, silly and immature.
I don't get it. If there's sexism? They shouldn't be watching the WTA at all, period?
Ohhhhh ... I;m with you now, from the bolded part. lol That is quite the petty, pathetic juvenile nonsense right there. LOL!
Basically - 'We hate you because you look like the girl we got rejected by in school - As nerds we UNITE'
LOL! Sad, pathetic, silly and immature.
So you think Evert is stronger and has more advanced technique than Nadal and Djokovic? The racquet technology has made the use of BETTER (more sophisticated) technique possible, as well as unlocked the ability to actually use your full strength when playing tennis. There is a reason all players spend far more time in the gym these days than they did in the 70's.
Interesting how you replied to that post. It's okay, mate. School is in the past......and the bolded part has much lulz to it :lol:
Well, I was kidding, but there may be some truth in what I wrote. Anyways, I wish people would just enjoy tennis. If someone has a problem with tennis today, s/he discuss such problems and solutions in a calm, thoughtful way. Write to the governing bodies, create petitions, but don't try to bring everyone else down. I love tennis in its current form, even if I believe some changes should be made.
What? lol I replied to everybody's post that was aimed at me. lol
Read through the responses. Did I skip someone, you?
I didn't focus on that post more than others? lol You joker.
I certainly wasn't the nerd with the tough time out there lol but it royally ****es me off if that is the reason she gets this hatred.
I didn't mean the post in general. I meant how you typed out your post. J/K anyways... everything ****es you off, so there is no surprise there! :grin:
He was joking anyways.....