donquijote
G.O.A.T.
But Djoko wants to get rid of hate...
I couldn't help noticing the left hand during 'relaxation'.
But Djoko wants to get rid of hate...
Meanwhile in Switzerland.....
Robert Federer dissected in Basel Sports channel the present world and Swiss tennis and says Roger "is the favorite for Wimbledon."
As.com Updated at: November 16, 2016 13: 13h CET
Robert Federer spoke about tennis today in the television Basel sports. First analyzed the Masters in London and compared the two world stars of the moment: "I'm glad Andy Murray has been placed number one, but I think Roger is a little better because it has shown in the worst moments. He won their last five matches, at Wimbledon, The Real Slam, and so on, but now he just needed a break is all." And the future is less clear for the Swiss star's long-time rival, Rafael Nadal: "From here on, I see it as difficult for him to win a Grand Slam because of stuff like winning more than two matches in a row and so on. But you never know, Rafa almost won a set against Novak at the French last year!"
He also had words for his son and disciple Roger who have all the faith in the world for the coming season: "I am convinced that we will see the best Roger Federer next season, peaking yet again at age 39, and will be the leading candidate to win Wimbledon and more. We haven't even bothered training. My boy Roger doesn't need that stuff."
Bob Federer dissected the future of Swiss tennis: "Continuity is looking good. Roger can dominate for maybe seven more years, and then the grandkids will be old enough to take over."
NAdal has too many injuries at this point to be competitive at Rolland Garros. 5 set clay over 7 matches is too tough on his body. his wrist, his back, his kness will all give out way before the final. and Nadal has also proven that he NO longer can beat Novak on anything, so No more French open for Nadal
True, because they have an updated strategy:
Unless....NAdal has too many injuries at this point to be competitive at Rolland Garros. 5 set clay over 7 matches is too tough on his body. his wrist, his back, his kness will all give out way before the final. and Nadal has also proven that he NO longer can beat Novak on anything, so No more French open for Nadal
Rafa isn't even Toni's favorite nephew, let alone his favorite for RG.
Rafa has been eternally obsessed with making his family happy and living up to his psychopathic uncle's expectations.
Only one player has beaten Nadal at Roland Garros in the last 7 years.
And that was also when he didn't fully recover from injuries
Only one player has beaten Nadal at Roland Garros in the last 7 years.
Who cares? A walkover is a loss. In the last 8 years Nadal has lost 3 times at RG.
A walkover is a loss? Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Here's his official RG record: 72-2
As for the 2 players who beat him, Rafa is still 3-1 and 6-1 against them AT Roland Garros. lol
Bow to your new king... King Rafa.
Who cares? A walkover is a loss.
Who cares? A walkover is a loss. In the last 8 years Nadal has lost 3 times at RG.
A walkover is by definition a loss. You gave up when you were supposed to play.
As for "King Rafa", Rafa is only "king" on the weakest surface and in the weakest era of that surface
Only two players--Solderling and Djokovic--have beaten Nadal at Roland Garros. Granollers is not credited with beating Rafa at RG. You know that.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/loss
"7. a losing by defeat; failure to win"
Nadal failed to win. He lost.
A walkover does not count towards a player's win/loss record.
It's still a loss.
Only in terms of ending any winning streaks, not in terms of win-loss records or head-to-heads. Nadal has only lost to Soderling and Djokovic at the French Open, not Granollers.
The ATP does not get to define what a "loss" is. A loss is a failure to win. Nadal failed to win 3 times in the last 8 years.
It's still a loss.
You initial reply was to my comment that said only one player has beaten Nadal at RG in the last 7 years. Instead of just saying your response made no sense (because you DO agree that only one player has beaten Nadal at RG in the last 7 years), you're going with this WO = loss nonsense.
Unless....
He gets many many TUEs.