TennisAddiction
Semi-Pro
My brother is flat hitter- very little spin but recently picked up some Pure Aeros.... no idea why. Is he destined for a disaster?
My brother is flat hitter- very little spin but recently picked up some Pure Aeros.... no idea why. Is he destined for a disaster?
This.of course no.
but it's not an optimal choice unless he wants to add more heavy top spin shots to his game.
It isn't the best option for more flat hitters but I have seen many flat hitting type players use it. Your brother can string it a bit tighter (at the expense of comfort a bit offcourse) to get some control. Also a good opportunity to try and incorporate a bit more spin to his strokes, which isn't necessarily a bad thing I think. Overall, sure, it suits modern spinny hitters more but anyone can adapt to it, in my opinion.My brother is flat hitter- very little spin but recently picked up some Pure Aeros.... no idea why. Is he destined for a disaster?
Great hitting. This seems like one fast court! And here I thought our indoor courts were fast. The balls on your court are zipping and sliding right inside. Very tough to play defense I'm guessing?My partner ( on the opposite side of the court on the video ) plays with PA strung with X1 Biphase full bed.
As you may see he is a pretty hard hitter with shots much flatter than mine . Also started tennis 40 years ago with wood rackets.
I've never seen him hitting wildly out.
He’ll basically be forced to learn to utilize spin at least a little bit, especially with today’s Pure Aeros....else he’ll be terribly inconsistent and frustrated.My brother is flat hitter- very little spin but recently picked up some Pure Aeros.... no idea why. Is he destined for a disaster?
This court is fast. But he is generally tough to play on any surface and balls skid the same way on hard or clay.Great hitting. This seems like one fast court! And here I thought our indoor courts were fast. The balls on your court are zipping and sliding right inside. Very tough to play defense I'm guessing?
This court is fast. But he is generally tough to play on any surface and balls skid the same way on hard or clay.
My point was that PA apparently has no control issues for a flat hitter even with one of the most powerful strings.
I've tried his rackets a few times and did not notice lack of control either
Depth control is a matter of power level of the setup frame+strings. I spent decent amount of time trying to select strings and tension for optimal power level - about 10 string jobs. ( That is why I hate switching rackets )I think directional control is very good, it’s more depth control that is hard to get with a flatter game
I agree, and actually I ended up with a not too bad setup, using 4G soft at 24kg.Depth control is a matter of power level of the setup frame+strings. I spent decent amount of time trying to select strings and tension for optimal power level - about 10 string jobs. ( That is why I hate switching rackets )
Once you figure that out depth is not an issue either.
It is very personal. I can't hit past the service line with a full bed of poly. So I mix it with syn gut. I only think that string selection is the most important process in adjusting to a new frame.I agree, and actually I ended up with a not too bad setup, using 4G soft at 24kg.
But it was harsh on my shoulder, and still I had the sense to be fighting against my opponent and my racquet all the time ! Found in my actual racquet, Angell TC95 a frame more suited to my game without sacrificing power or spin potential