Wimbledon - Fed 8 and Nole 8

ND-13

Hall of Fame
Not unless Djokovic wins 9. If Djokovic played Queens or Halle , what is the guarantee he wins Wimbledon ?

I am happy Novak equalled the legend Borg. Novak will likely get the HC record and that is good enough for me.
 

vex

Legend
Fed is the better grass player - even if they tied at 8 - but the margin isn’t nearly as big as some claim. They both have special skills that work well on grass (Fed: serve, first strike tennis, all court game. Djoker: serve, return, accuracy)
 

Lew II

G.O.A.T.
CJpd1kmUkAAm4kn.jpg


379402-novak-fed-trophy.jpg


110248297-856e7921-7092-419c-9bd1-4b96f8580790.jpg
 

blablavla

G.O.A.T.
Career points won %, Grass:
Federer: 54.72%

Djokovic: 54.05%

Career points won % vs Top 10 Opponents, Grass:
Federer: 51.65%

Djokovic: 51.37%

Career points won % vs Opponents w/ Elo >= 2000, Grass:
Federer: 53.55%

Djokovic: 52.63%

Career games won %, Grass:
Federer: 58.63%

Djokovic: 57.97%

Career sets won %, Grass:
Federer: 80.00%

Djokovic: 76.12%

Admittedly, these numbers are actually closer than I thought, and if Novak does win a few more Wimbledons, I'd have to consider his case over Roger. But for the time being, Roger clearly gets the nod.

source: Ultimate Tennis Statistics

Lew II is it you hiding behind a second account?
 

daggerman

Hall of Fame
Lew II is it you hiding behind a second account?

People really need to stop insinuating I don't know how to use statistics. It's insulting, especially when coming from people who ostensibly aren't well-versed in statistics.

What problem do you have with the stats I used? Let's dig deeper.
 
Pretty sure Federer will have more finals at Wimby still, and then of course all the other titles that he has on grass.

The H2H is already accounted for in the Wimby titles both have, and I'm not sure how 38 y.o. Federer holding 2 MP's over 32 y.o. Djokovic proves Djokovic is the better player on grass.
 
Top