peoplespeace
Professional
Which female players have atp forehand? I referring to the late supination and relaxed snapping wrist. Ie more like Fogning and Dimitrov (and Federer!) than eg Chardy.
I've often referred to it as a hybrid implementation. But I believe the Fh strokes of Garbine M. and Amanda A. are actually closer to a compact, modern Fh rather than a classic WTA Fh. More compact, more "modern" than Serena or Simona.
I've often referred to it as a hybrid implementation. But I believe the Fh strokes of Garbine M. and Amanda A. are actually closer to a compact, modern Fh rather than a classic WTA Fh. More compact, more "modern" than Serena or Simona.
What would you call this?I've often referred to it as a hybrid implementation. But I believe the Fh strokes of Garbine M. and Amanda A. are actually closer to a compact, modern Fh rather than a classic WTA Fh. More compact, more "modern" than Serena or Simona.
Compare it to Serena, Simona, Dayana Y or others with Fh stokes that are more of a classic WTA style. AA is significantly more compact than Sloane.Maybe I need to recalibrate because that looks like a WTA FH to me.
I'd say AA is more compact and closer to modern or ATP Fh than thisWhat would you call this?
To me it’s the same as Halep’s except the size.I'd say AA is more compact and closer to modern or ATP Fh than this
To be clear, when I speak of "compact", I'm not referring to the size of the loop. It's much more about whether or not the racket is pulled behind the body -- behind the coronal plan.To me it’s the same as Halep’s except the size.
IMO the simple defining element is the position of forearm on take back.To be clear, when I speak of "compact", I'm not referring to the size of the loop. It's much more about whether or not the racket is pulled behind the body -- behind the coronal plan.
Look at the (extreme) direction of Simona's racket on her take back. Not as extreme as Sloane but quite a bit more than Amanda.
Simona pulls her whole racket and her hand behind her body (coronal plane). But Amanda does not. At most, only the tip of her racket breaks that plane. Huge diff.
(Of course there are also some other elements that might distinguish a classic WTA Fh from a prototypical ATP Fh)
Defining element? Not sure I agree.IMO the simple defining element is the position of forearm on take back.
Pronated ATP
Supinated WTA
Supination is the main factor that takes the racket behind coronal plane.whether or not the racket is pulled behind the body -- behind the coronal plan.
Ok, neutral is also acceptable. Supinated at the highest part of the take back makes WTA what it is.Pronated or supinated at what part of the takeback? (I believe that my own ATP implementation is neutral)
I'm thinking that it's also possible to achieve that with little or no supination. That takeback could conceivably be realized, primarily, with horizontal shoulder abduction and an active wrist extension. Not uncommon to see an active flip (extension) of the wrist on the takeback for some WTA implementations. I cringe when I see that active extension.Supination is the main factor that takes the racket behind coronal plane.
I'm thinking that it's also possible to achieve that with little or no supination. That takeback could conceivably be realized, primarily, with horizontal shoulder abduction and an active wrist extension. Not uncommon to see an active flip (extension) of the wrist on the takeback for some WTA implementations. I cringe when I see that active extension.
Different ways to get the racket way back there. Somewhat dependent on the Fh grip employed
Are there female players who have a straight arm at contact?IMO the simple defining element is the position of forearm on take back.
Pronated ATP
Supinated WTA
The highest part or rather the "deepest" part, ie just before the forward swing?Supination is the main factor that takes the racket behind coronal plane.
Ok, neutral is also acceptable. Supinated at the highest part of the take back makes WTA what it is.
Leyla FernandezAre there female players who have a straight arm at contact?
Something like that. ATP forward swing forces the forearm to supinate. WTA doesn’t as it is already supinated. That’s also why they don’t get any flip of racket backwards.The highest part or rather the "deepest" part, ie just before the forward swing?
I had indicated that Lleylah might have a hybrid Fh style. The straight arm technique she employs is rather interesting. I had forgotten that she did that.
However, she contacts with a bent arm which is quintessntially WTA although many ATP players also do this, most notably Djokovic.I had also indicated that Emma R might also utilize a hybrid Fh technique. Looking at this video, it appears to be more ATP than WTA. In his video, Ryan indicates that she does not employ as much leg as Roger does but in other respects it is a modern (ATP) Fh
Only one Fh in this vid. Amanda's Fh has likely changed over time. It could also be situational. In this clip, her Fh looks different from her shadow swings and her Fh strokes hitting against Nick K earlier in this thread.Doesn't she have a huge WTA takeback?
The straight arm Fh is only one variation of the ATP Fh. While there are more players in the past few years hitting straight arm than there once was, a vast majority of the ATP forehands were bent arm like Djoko & Murray when the concept was first presented.However, she contacts with a bent arm which is quintessntially WTA although many ATP players also do this, most notably Djokovic.
Didn't expect this from Nik. I can't go to the club with a WTA FH or the BROs will laugh at me.What would you call this?
WTA Fh good enuff for Del Potro, Chardy and other ATP playersDidn't expect this from Nik. I can't go to the club with a WTA FH or the BROs will laugh at me.
Rec tennis is a demanding game, aesthetics being a fundamental aspect of it.WTA Fh good enuff for Del Potro, Chardy and other ATP players
Aesthetics may be fundamental yet I've seen plenty with gr8 looking ground strokes but goofy looking serve motionsRec tennis is a demanding game, aesthetics being a fundamental aspect of it.
That is something unforgivable, unfortunately it is pretty common, there must be at least some balance.Aesthetics may be fundamental yet I've seen plenty with gr8 looking ground strokes but goofy looking serve motions
Terrible chicken-wing FH!What would you call this?
Terrible chicken-wing FH!
If not a PD with low tension he’d be just another weak bunter!
Plus it looks like it might be a serve return!Only one Fh in this vid. Amanda's Fh has likely changed over time. It could also be situational. In this clip, her Fh looks different from her shadow swings and her Fh strokes hitting against Nick K earlier in this thread.
She prepares quite a higher in this video than the others. But still her takeback is on the compact side. She doesn't take it back a far as a typical WTA Fh
Nik excused his chicken wing FH in response to a comment made about it: "the touring pro’s FH’s and my FH are not different bio mechanically speaking, since I played at the highest level. The difference between my FH compared to the best FH’s in the world (Fed, Rafa, Nole etc.) is that is has less spin."Terrible chicken-wing FH!
If not a PD with low tension he’d be just another weak bunter!
Nik excused his chicken wing FH in response to a comment made about it: "the touring pro’s FH’s and my FH are not different bio mechanically speaking, since I played at the highest level. The difference between my FH compared to the best FH’s in the world (Fed, Rafa, Nole etc.) is that is has less spin."
Perhaps a kick serve or some other high bouncing shotPlus it looks like it might be a serve return!
I was kidding obviously. He blasts balls hard and reliably.Nik excused his chicken wing FH in response to a comment made about it: "the touring pro’s FH’s and my FH are not different bio mechanically speaking, since I played at the highest level. The difference between my FH compared to the best FH’s in the world (Fed, Rafa, Nole etc.) is that is has less spin."
No doubt it is effective and ugly.I was kidding obviously. He blasts balls hard and reliably.
I think his FH has most fundamentals. But lacks some polish and perfection you see with most current pros. They do improve technically even well into their pro careers.
I don't like his FH as a model though and won't recommend to copy neither his takeback nor finish.
Of course he doesn't want to admit he has a women's forehand.Btw Nik thinks his fh is ATP!
I'm guessing you know this because he said it in a video?Btw Nik thinks his fh is ATP!
Correct.I'm guessing you know this because he said it in a video?