But that is exactly what sandbagging is. There is virtually no sandbagging in USTA as a result of the appeals process. Any USTA sandbagging is by virtue of throwing games in spring adult matches to come in under a threshold. The elite combo teams are built by throwing games/matches in adult spring league, not by rating appeals. The exact same thing would happen in any league, including UTR.
I play tournaments. So naturally, I’ve seen more USTA sandbagging in the form of the appeals process. And in the examples I’ve witnessed where people play in tournaments at lower ratings than what they play in leagues.
It appears most on these forums play league, so the sandbagging is more along the lines of what you’re describing. It seems that with leagues, there are captains & overall a lot more people willing to address issues when they see them. At tourneys, it’s just the weekend, the tourney directors dont care that much, and nobody has any backup or pull to file a complaint with.
That might play a large part of our disconnect on this issue.
I’ve done some UTR tourneys. Witnessed ZERO sandbagging. Fair & close competition. I credit the dynamic ratings system and the fact that it is incentivized to get you score higher. They could easily figure out a way to do that for league play. Something USTA cant/wont do because players like settling into where they’re comfortable and then they stay there forever. Unless they need to game the system because they’re worried about getting bumped up.
At a shallow glance... USTA could solve their problem with this by making a few tweaks:
1. Dynamic rating system that moves people up in real time
2. Automatically bumping up every team that qualifies for Nationals the following year
3. Get rid of the appeals down process. It’s abuse chases away more players than it saves