One of the most elusive records in men's tennis

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru

Tennis: Top five players to win Grand Slam without dropping a set​

By
Sayantan Chakraborty
Sayantan Chakraborty

April 1 2023

Rafael Nadal & Bjorn Borg are in rare rich company in the modern era.​


The list of Men’s Singles Tennis Grand Slam winners winning without dropping a set is very exclusive, in the modern era. Two men have done it three times in the recent past. One player has done it 4 times.

Here’s a list below of the players who’ve achieved Grand Slams without dropping a set:


5. Illie Nastae, (1, French Open 1970)​


For Illie Nastase, the French Open victory was one for the ages as he defeated Yugoslavian Nikola Pulic (6-3,6-0,6-0) in the final to clinch the victory. In the entire run towards his triumph, not only did he not drop a set in the entire tournament, but also only dropped 38 games in total, a tall feat to achieve at the time.


His words post the win was “Since I was a kid and since I started on a clay court in Romania, I’ve dreamt about winning Roland-Garros. In 1971, I missed the trophy. But on this June 3rd, 1979, I finally got my revenge. I hadn’t lost a single set, and I was facing the impressive left-handed, Nikola Pilic in the final”, after the match.

4. Ken Rosewall (Australian Open, 1972)​


Ken Rosewall has also a distinguished record of being the oldest ever grand slam winner, which we achieved, achieved courtesy of a straight sets victory win over Mal Anderson, in 1972. Roger Federer came closest to his age (7 months younger) when he won the Wimbledon title in 2017 without any dropped sets.


3. Roger Federer (3, Australian Open (2007), Wimbledon (2017)​


The other great player in the modern era to have won a Grand Slam without dropping a set is the great Roger Federer, who did it twice, in 2007 at the Australian Open and ten years later in 2017. The 41-year-old Swede is the only tennis player to be the only one to have won both junior & senior Wimbledon singles titles without dropping a set. Roger Federer won his lone Wimbledon junior singles title in 1998 while his eighth singles title in 2017 without dropping a set.

2. Bjorn Borg (3, 1976 Wimbledon & 1978,1980 (French Open))​


This feat has been achieved only nine times in Tennis history, particularly in the men’s individual events where the level of competition has always been the highest, particularly since Bjorn Borg’s successes in the 1970s & 80s. He became the icon & star at the time due to his swashbuckling dominance with the tennis racquet, and becoming the second player after Illie Nastae in the Open Era to win a Grand Slam without opening a set.


His 1st such title came in 1976 at Wimbledon. However, he created history in 1978 at Rolland Garros where the record of only losing 32 games (Nadal dropped 37 games in the 2017 edition) still stands on route to winning the Championship. He repeated the feat again in 1980, although he dropped 21 games, this time.

1. Rafael Nadal (4, French Open 2008, 2010, 2017, 2020)​


Rafael Nadal won the first slam without dropping a set in the French Open in 2008, and followed it up in 2010, 2017 & 2020, becoming the undisputed King of Clay court.


Also, an astonishing statistic was achieved in the Men’s singles category, where the fewest games lost in a Grand Slam event by a man in the modern era (All best-of-5 matches) was Bjorn Borg with 32 in the 1978 French Open. While Nadal outdid this feat in the 2017 French Open with 35 matches unbeaten.


 

NonP

Legend
Doing it 4x times is really cool at one Slam especially with a 12-year span

But Fed doing it ten years apart at different Slams is wild, especially when the second one was done at almost 36yo
C'mon Cilic was injured in the F and the 1st-rounder vs. Dolgo was a virtual W/O. You can't talk up Fed's age while ignoring the other side of the net.

It could have been 5 for Nadal, winning the USO dropping just one set in the final.

Any ATG could've pulled it off without a single tough opponent. Doesn't tell us crap.

'85-87 Lendl was more dominant, anyway.

Funny how times and posting topics change :whistle:
It's a fair point to bring up... if the agenda weren't so damn obvious. That 3rd RG must've hurt a lot, eh?
 

MeatTornado

Talk Tennis Guru
Losing just the one set in the final is far more impressive than losing it in Rnd 2.
True. But one could also argue it's more impressive to shut down the better opponent in the final.

In round 2 a top seed like Novak isn't taking the match quite as seriously. Probably still just finding his footing with the conditions and not going all out to win every point.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
True. But one could also argue it's more impressive to shut down the better opponent in the final.

In round 2 a top seed like Novak isn't taking the match quite as seriously. Probably still just finding his footing with the conditions and not going all out to win every point.
I don’t buy ‘not taking early rounds seriously’. You can’t win the tournament in the first week but you can lose it.

Novak lost early to Istomin, Chung, and Ceccinato and he was livid. He wouldn’t even attend the PM press conference after losing early at RG.
 

MeatTornado

Talk Tennis Guru
I don’t buy ‘not taking early rounds seriously’. You can’t win the tournament in the first week but you can lose it.

Novak lost early to Istomin, Chung, and Ceccinato and he was livid. He wouldn’t even attend the PM press conference after losing early at RG.
Those losses didn't come from not taking them seriously. Those were from him being in poor form at the time. Those were all in 2017-18 while he was dealing with his elbow situation.

It's not even comparable to him dropping a set at the 2011 AO for example. Novak isn't going to play every point like it's his last in the first week against no name opponents.
 

Rosstour

G.O.A.T.
C'mon Cilic was injured in the F and the 1st-rounder vs. Dolgo was a virtual W/O. You can't talk up Fed's age while ignoring the other side of the net.

Any ATG could've pulled it off without a single tough opponent. Doesn't tell us crap.

'85-87 Lendl was more dominant, anyway.

It's a fair point to bring up... if the agenda weren't so damn obvious. That 3rd RG must've hurt a lot, eh?

Yes, Healthy Cilic is undefeated like Healthy Nadal. But you can only play who's in front of you.

Remember Fed was almost 36 then, same age give or take as Nadal, Wawrinka and Murray are now. Imagine one of them blowing through the field without losing a set? We would be calling it one of the most impressive performances of all time.
 

NonP

Legend
Not an elusive record if Nastase holds it.
It's actually '73 RG where Nasty went a perfect 19-0 (the 1st two rounds were Bo3), but FYI some of the earlier RGs don't quite deserve full Slam status cuz WCT players boycotted the event starting in '70. Definitely a notch below Bull's and Borg's (later) perfect title runs.

Yes, Healthy Cilic is undefeated like Healthy Nadal. But you can only play who's in front of you.

Remember Fed was almost 36 then, same age give or take as Nadal, Wawrinka and Murray are now. Imagine one of them blowing through the field without losing a set? We would be calling it one of the most impressive performances of all time.
Bro, it's common knowledge that Cilic was crying cuz the injury happened at the worst possible time. You can question some of Bull's possum acts but not this one.

Mind you it's an impressive run regardless, but the fact that Fed had to clear just five competitive rounds must be considered when highlighting his age, no?
 

Rosstour

G.O.A.T.
It's actually '73 RG where Nasty went a perfect 19-0 (the 1st two rounds were Bo3), but FYI some of the earlier RGs don't quite deserve full Slam status cuz WCT players boycotted the event starting in '70. Definitely a notch below Bull's and Borg's (later) perfect title runs.

Bro, it's common knowledge that Cilic was crying cuz the injury happened at the worst possible time. You can question some of Bull's possum acts but not this one.

Mind you it's an impressive run regardless, but the fact that Fed had to clear just five competitive rounds must be considered when highlighting his age, no?

I don't see anyone qualifying any of Nadal's runs. Why do we only do this for Fed?

Not saying Cilic wasn't injured. He obviously was. The "healthy Cilic" joke was just that
 

NonP

Legend
Borg's most unbreakable record is that he only lost to one guy at RG.

Not even Rafa can compete with that.
And his best RG outings were even more dominant than Bull's. You just gotta laugh at his average 69.7% of GW in his title runs. Nobody, and I mean nobody, will ever top that.

I don't see anyone qualifying any of Nadal's runs. Why do we only do this for Fed?

Not saying Cilic wasn't injured. He obviously was. The "healthy Cilic" joke was just that
Well, maybe that's because his four perfect runs at RG (with the only arguable exception of '20) were fully legit? His '17 USO without facing a single top 20 player is qualified all the time, and with damn good reason.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
And his best RG outings were even more dominant than Bull's. You just gotta laugh at his average 69.7% of GW in his title runs. Nobody, and I mean nobody, will ever top that.


Well, maybe that's because his four perfect runs at RG (with the only arguable exception of '20) were fully legit? His '17 USO without facing a single top 20 player is qualified all the time, and with damn good reason.
Who exactly would beat Rafa at the 2017 USO though?
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Those losses didn't come from not taking them seriously. Those were from him being in poor form at the time. Those were all in 2017-18 while he was dealing with his elbow situation.

It's not even comparable to him dropping a set at the 2011 AO for example. Novak isn't going to play every point like it's his last in the first week against no name opponents.
They owe it to the viewing public to do their best at all times.

Rafa has come back from a lengthy time out multiple times, but he always gives of his best. I don't remember you making allowances for Rafa when he's come back from injury.
 
Yes, Healthy Cilic is undefeated like Healthy Nadal. But you can only play who's in front of you.

Remember Fed was almost 36 then, same age give or take as Nadal, Wawrinka and Murray are now. Imagine one of them blowing through the field without losing a set? We would be calling it one of the most impressive performances of all time.

Healthy Cilic has some moral defeats. Outside of 2022, healthy Nadal has none.

Fair point on the second paragraph - though Wawrinka is actually almost 2.5 years older now than Federer was at Wimbledon 2017 and is some months older than Federer was at Wimbledon 2019. He is more or less exactly the same age as Federer was at the Australian Open 2020 (38 years, 5 months).
 

NonP

Legend
Not nearly as elusive and impressive as winning a slam dropping 2 sets in every match. That would be something.
I just went thru the least dominant Slam runs of the OE (scroll to the bottom) to see if anyone has ever come close to earning this disputably dubious distinction:

1973 USO - This is the most bookend-y run I've come across, Newk eking out a 5-set W in 1R/F but largely breezing through the rest of the draw (including pre-'74 Jimbo in QF).

1975 AO - Newk had to survive a whopping FOUR 5-setters in 2R/4R/QF/SF, and the 4-set F vs. Jimbo was no walk in the park, either. It's almost a miracle this doesn't top (if that's the way to put it) Goran's Cinderella run as the most difficult of the OE (in GW%).

1985 AO - Edberg had to fend off Masur and Lendl in 5-set 4R/SF, but he had a bye into 2R and the AO field wasn't quite 100% yet. Far from the most demanding Slam run.

1985 Wimbledon - Boris' stunning run as a 17-year-old teen - unsurpassed to this day at SW19 and bested only by Chang at '89 RG - was understandably bumpy with 5-set 3R/4R vs. Nystrom and Mayotte, but his QF/SF/F were fairly uneventful 4-setters except for the 2 TBs vs. red-hot Curren.

1989 RG - Perhaps the most famous of all gutsy Slam runs and I'm surprised that this failed to make the (pre-'14) OE top 20. But that's because Chang went the distance only vs. Lendl and Edberg in 4R/F.

1992 USO - Yes, this is Stefan's legendary run where he had to suffer grueling 5-setters vs. Krajicek, Lendl and Chang in 4R/QF/SF followed by a hardly gimme F vs. pre-Pistoling Pete. But his first three rounds were straight-set routs.

1999 RG - Dre needed 5 sets to dispatch Clement and a rejuvenated A. Medvedev in 2R/F, but the rest were relatively straightforward affairs.

2000 USO - Marat did struggle early including in 5-set 2R/3R, but as you'd gather from that spectacular beatdown on Pistol he did raise his game later on.

2001 Wimbledon - Everyone knows about Goran's nail-biters vs. Henman and Rafter. Before the SF/F, though, he was actually in commanding form with some of the most sensational serving you'll ever see.

2004 RG - Yes, this is the one with the infamous F vs. Coria, and Gaudio also needed 5 sets to fend off Canas and Jiri Novak in 1R/2R. At the same time he broke serve a possibly OE-record (confirmed at least since '91) 62 times.

2014 Wimbledon - Somewhat surprisingly this is Djoker's toughest Slam title, with the 5-set QF/F vs. Cilic and Fraud and tight sets throughout. That gives him 58.0% of GW (160/276), #19 at the bottom of the OE ladder.

2017 AO - Though Fraud did have those 5-setters vs. Kei, Stan and Bull in 4R/SF/F he didn't drop a set in the other rounds, just barely managing to stay out of the OE top 20 in lowest GW% at 58.3% (155/266).

2021 RG - Strictly speaking Djoker did have two 5-setters vs. Musetti and Tsits in 4R/F, but the last 3 sets of both matches were lopsided in his favor, hence his above-average 62.2% of GW.

2022 AO - The so-called asterisk Slam with its greatest champ out, and Bull's 5-set struggles against Shapo and Med in QF/F seem to support that view... except he was never pushed for the rest of the fortnight.

2022 USO - Y'all already know about Carlitos' 5-setters vs. Cilic, Sinner and Tiafoe in 4R/QF/SF, but this still doesn't make the OE top 20 of the least winning Slam runs, just 0.2% (58.2% or 160/275) below Djoker's '14 Wimby and Stan's '16 USO (also 58.0% or 163/281).

So close but no cigar. Though '75 Newk seems to "win" this contest with a whopping 9 dropped sets only the SF was a notable 5-setter against a worthy opponent in Roche as opposed to '92 Edberg's heroic consecutive battles against Krajicek, Lendl and Chang. And Stefan's 2nd USO is widely and justly considered one of the clutchest performances ever, which means, yes, a prolonged and gutsy run is arguably even more impressive than a perfect/dominant one.

Who exactly would beat Rafa at the 2017 USO though?
Well, given his H2H vs. your boy that year one could say Fraud wins the whole shebang if he ekes out that 3rd-set TB vs. Delpo. But I know how you feel about Fedal at the majors. :p
 

Hitman

Bionic Poster
This is great.

Rafa can hold this record, while Novak can hold the grand slam record.

Both sides are happy and everything is in balance. (y) :)
 

dr325i

G.O.A.T.
Only epic players can do this
some do that (run through a slam with no dropped sets) at a single slam (as well as 65% of overall wins on a 30% played surface), and some just keep adding slams to the tally and surpass all of their career competition (slams, masters, weeks, WTF, YE#1, H2H, blah blah...already heard, I am sure ;)).
Let's come up with another "record" to make the other fans happy :)
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
some do that (run through a slam with no dropped sets) at a single slam (as well as 65% of overall wins on a 30% played surface), and some just keep adding slams to the tally and surpass all of their career competition (slams, masters, weeks, WTF, YE#1, H2H, blah blah...already heard, I am sure ;)).
Let's come up with another "record" to make the other fans happy :)
Rafa has missed 19 slams so far yet he is only one behind Djoker. What does that tell you?
 
Top