Whaaaat. Chelsea have a blip under Mourinho, but City go through the season with a relatively unproven manager, in his first season in the Premier League, without an issue?
Not sure about that.
Chelsea will be winning it for me, the Manchester teams will be fighting for second imo.
i've been pretty good at predicting the Chelsea position over the last 4 or so years in the thread. People laughed at me with my prediction of 6th a few years ago, but it happened.
City will do well in the Champions League this year under the new manager, but to be more consistent than a Mourinho team (who always wins the title in his first season, usually by record margins)? Don't see it personally.
Haha - we'll see! I think that because, as you've long pointed out, you haven't brought in the bustling, deeper lying midfielders (is van Ginkel the solution here, or Luiz? What happened to Romeu?). The blip usually happens once the weather turns and the quality of the pitches heads downhill - exactly when you need the steel in the middle.
Anyway, bearing in mind the 2nd half vs Hull was reminiscent of Mourinho Mk I, and he seems happy with his squad, I wouldn't be surprised to see Chelsea end up top.
What's fascinating about Arsenal's case is what they have, structurally at the moment which would be appealing to any prespective manager - zero debt, the club owns the stadium which is payed off in full, the best scouting network on the planet (albeit one that isn't utilized in full), a massive youth setup, an amazing training complex, and above all else, money.
The club actually still holds quite a lot of debt, but the net debt situation is much healthier (about £100m, due to cash assets of over £150m). The stadium will be paid off by 2031 (about £19m a year in interest and principal repayment - easily manageable). But your point is spot on, everything at the club seems to be in place to really kick on, but it's all constrained at the moment by the culture and mentality at the club, embodied by its leaders. This is probably an understandable result of the culture and mentality that was necessary to successfully execute the move to the new stadium: restraint, sacrifice, patience, caution, parsimony etc. That's why I believe we need the senior personnel to be replaced.
Gazidis isn't worth jack (and considering I've met him multiple times as he used to live a few streets over when he was the Deputy Commissioner at MLS and my neighbor and him are very close; so I'm kind of going out on a limb by saying this no matter how truthful it is) and is way out of his league. Wenger is great and should either become director of the youth setup or director of football. He is too valuable as a person to simply be let go. Get someone new in there as the atmosphere at Arsenal has grown stale. The fans need to grow some balls, too. If they don't like Kronke's desire to not spend any money, they should vote with their feet/wallets and hit his bottom line. He sees Arsenal as a profitable club, which is a good thing for the club, but not for it's first team. If those yearly profits could come out to 10 or 15 million, that's still a decent return because the club has zero outstanding financial expenditures and can use that extra 35-45 million to buy players which in turn makes the value of the club as a whole increase (better players = better position in the league = team is more commercially viable = better sponsors = more money)
I do agree that it would be a tragedy to let someone as talented as Wenger go. However, it's not really a possibility to retain him as a Director of Football, or in any position that interacts with the manager, as he would simply interfere. The guy is pretty much omnipotent and unchallengeable at Arsenal; he is a really intelligent and focussed guy, but it's pretty clear that he is power-hungry and untrusting. Anyway, he'll be snapped up immediately by someone else if we let him go.
Re Gazidis, it's not surprising things have turned out how they have. The appointment was effectively made by Wenger (yes, a manager appointing his boss), so he brought in someone with the skillset to broker the much-needed new commercial deals, but who didn't have the stature or personality to challenge his own authority.
Re fans voting with their feet at the stadium (Arsenal is pretty much the only top club where match-day sales constitute over 50% of revenues, due to the crappy legacy commercial deals which made financing the stadium possible), I believe it is starting to happen. The much-publicised season ticket waiting list of 50,000 fans pretty much doesn't exist; 50,000 people may have stumped up £20 to have the option, but the ability and willingness to pay clearly isn't there (they were trying to flog season tickets by email this summer, right until kick-off on Saturday). Games actually go to 'general sale' now (unthinkable two or three years ago), where no club membership is needed, at which point the stadium will always fill up due to the sheer volume of tourists in London at any point.
I'm glad someone does
When I think of Kroenke, I think of his Rams in the NFL, he's all about the profit. He could care less about fielding a contender. Great for his pocketbook but stinks as a fan.
Wenger just needs a real boss to hold his feet to the fire and Ivan is not it.
Agreed - probably the majority of Arsenal fans would turn a blind eye to his tactical oversights and embrace his continued tenure if a new CEO / Chairman came in who could hold him to account, and forcibly take some of the work-load off him. But it's clear that's an impossibility: Wenger would not appoint such a figure, because they would diminish his authority (as stated before, why he brought in a weak-chinned soft-c*ck as CEO); and Kroenke wouldn't make such a move, because he believes his financial interest in the club is tied to Wenger's miserly ways (his understanding of Arsenal Football Club doesn't extend beyond 'I will invest because there is a guy there who has a track record of making the club money').