steelcity32
Rookie
I want Federer to win for that number 1 to be secured, but at the same time Fedfans will be in full blown circlejerk mode if he does and I don't think I can stomach that.
Thiem loses in 2 against Berrettini. His game W/L ratio drops to 51.9%.
Almost for sure the winner of Djokovic-Federer match grabs 1st place in group B.
The only way for Thiem to recover 1st place is Fed's win in tight three sets.
Can Djokovic win the group with a win?
I want Federer to win for that number 1 to be secured, but at the same time Fedfans will be in full blown circlejerk mode if he does and I don't think I can stomach that.
I want Federer to win for that number 1 to be secured
I give Federer a 5% chance of beating Djoker today. If Federer shows up in good form, he has a slight chance.
Let's take a look at Federer vs Djoker since 2018:
2019 WI: Federer should have won this match. Federer broke Djoker 7 times, and Djoker broke Fed only 3 times. Federer scored 14 more points than Djoker. I've never heard of somebody out-breaking somebody 7-3, yet still losing. But that's what going 0-3 in tiebreakers will do. Quite honestly, I'm far more upset about Fed going 0-3 in tiebreakers than the blown 40-15. Federer was extremely competitive here. But he failed in the clutch department multiple times. And FYI, my takeaway here is 0-3 in tiebreakers, not 40-15.
2018 Paris SF: Federer wasn't broken the entire match while he broke Djoker once. However, Federer lost both tiebreakers here. Federer was definitely in this match as well. Federer played really well. But he still couldn't out-clutch Djoker when it counted. Fed was 0-2 in tiebreakers in this match.
2018 Cincy: A horrendous version of Federer showed up here. An extemely rusty Stan should have won against Fed. He choked. An injured Goffin pushed Fed to a tiebreak, then retired in the 2nd set at 1-1. Thankfully, Djoker didn't play all that great in a 6-4, 6-4 win. Federer was absolutely horrendous this whole tourney. This version of Federer could show up today. If he does, then expect breadsticks.
Fed's loss of speed this year is accelerating. Federer looks extremely slow on the court. I really noticed that watching him play Thiem. And Fed no longer has a cannon forehand to slug the younger players off of the court, which is why we see Federer losing more than he wins against guys like Zverev and Thiem.
Federer will need to serve like a boss while being extremely clutch against Djoker to have a chance.
Oh, but Fed fans stomach the tired 40-15 posts three hundreds times daily here. That's the biggest circle jerk cycle ever seen here.I want Federer to win for that number 1 to be secured, but at the same time Fedfans will be in full blown circlejerk mode if he does and I don't think I can stomach that.
5% is way too small, make it 25% to be more realistic. Someone like Ryan Harrison has a 5% chance of beating Djokovic, Fed is considerably more accomplished, to put it mildly.I give Federer a 5% chance of beating Djoker today.... Federer will need to serve like a boss
5% is way too small, make it 25% to be more realistic. Someone like Ryan Harrison has a 5% chance of beating Djokovic, Fed is considerably more accomplished, to put it mildly.
Federer has been serving excruciatingly badly here this week. His first serve speed is oftentimes 110 MPH, which is a sitting duck for anyone, especially Djokovic. Annacone was puzzled why the serve has been so slow and predictable this event.
But if Fedr beats Djokovic than Nadal gets the YEThis will be a massacre by Djokovic, beating Chokerer in straight sets.
C'mon Djoker, pulverize that Big nose
This will be a massacre by Djokovic, beating Chokerer in straight sets.
C'mon Djoker, pulverize that Big nose
And slice extremely well, imo.I give Federer a 5% chance of beating Djoker today. If Federer shows up in good form, he has a slight chance.
Let's take a look at Federer vs Djoker since 2018:
2019 WI: Federer should have won this match. Federer broke Djoker 7 times, and Djoker broke Fed only 3 times. Federer scored 14 more points than Djoker. I've never heard of somebody out-breaking somebody 7-3, yet still losing. But that's what going 0-3 in tiebreakers will do. Quite honestly, I'm far more upset about Fed going 0-3 in tiebreakers than the blown 40-15. Federer was extremely competitive here. But he failed in the clutch department multiple times. And FYI, my takeaway here is 0-3 in tiebreakers, not 40-15.
2018 Paris SF: Federer wasn't broken the entire match while he broke Djoker once. However, Federer lost both tiebreakers here. Federer was definitely in this match as well. Federer played really well. But he still couldn't out-clutch Djoker when it counted. Fed was 0-2 in tiebreakers in this match.
2018 Cincy: A horrendous version of Federer showed up here. An extemely rusty Stan should have won against Fed. He choked. An injured Goffin pushed Fed to a tiebreak, then retired in the 2nd set at 1-1. Thankfully, Djoker didn't play all that great in a 6-4, 6-4 win. Federer was absolutely horrendous this whole tourney. This version of Federer could show up today. If he does, then expect breadsticks.
Fed's loss of speed this year is accelerating. Federer looks extremely slow on the court. I really noticed that watching him play Thiem. And Fed no longer has a cannon forehand to slug the younger players off of the court, which is why we see Federer losing more than he wins against guys like Zverev and Thiem.
Federer will need to serve like a boss while being extremely clutch against Djoker to have a chance.
Are you a Nadal fan? If you are then you should want Federer to win today.This will be a massacre by Djokovic, beating Chokerer in straight sets.
C'mon Djoker, pulverize that Big nose
No worries, Djoker is a man of steel. In the USO 2015 final, Novak managed to win despite massive pro-Fed support. And this gave rise to this excellent reaction:Novak vs. Federer and O2 arena. It will be tough to watch.
A true Nadal fan would know BOM is one of the best Nadal fans.Are you a Nadal fan? If you are then you should want Federer to win today.
The chances that he makes it through RR are around 20-25% tomorrow, so not that great for us. But if we try to find something positive, then oh well, do we really want him to face Djokovic on this tournament, in this form? Rhetorical question, no?@Yugram What do you think about Nadal's position?
I remember that but I think it's harder for him to endure crowd unfairness these days. Makes matches worse too. Just unhealthy atmosphere.No worries, Djoker is a man of steel. In the USO 2015 final, Novak managed to win despite massive pro-Fed support. And this gave rise to this excellent reaction:
If only Zverev could beat Tsitsipas. It would be a different story. I don't think anybody is beating Djokovic here. He gets the YE#1 as a gift.The chances that he makes it through RR are around 20-25% tomorrow, so not that great for us. But if we try to find something positive, then oh well, do we really want him to face Djokovic on this tournament, in this form? Rhetorical question, no?
So I guess all what’s left is to take additional 200 points, hope someone beats Djokovic and enjoy the rest till AO.
5% is way too small, make it 25% to be more realistic. Someone like Ryan Harrison has a 5% chance of beating Djokovic, Fed is considerably more accomplished, to put it mildly.
Federer has been serving excruciatingly badly here this week. His first serve speed is oftentimes 110 MPH, which is a sitting duck for anyone, especially Djokovic. Annacone was puzzled why the serve has been so slow and predictable this event.
Yep, you're right. My bad.No, in case of a two men draw, what counts the most is the match they played and in this case Thiem got the best of both Federer and Djokovic. He has already won the group since his win against Djokovic.
I find the h2h rule stupidNo, in case of a two men draw, what counts the most is the match they played and in this case Thiem got the best of both Federer and Djokovic. He has already won the group since his win against Djokovic.
How is it a gift? He still has to win his remaining matches. And if he does, he’ll have 6 titles to Nadal’s 4, and 5 “big” titles to Nadal’s 4. More match wins on the season, more finals, etc. It would be a deserving number one, would it not?If only Zverev could beat Tsitsipas. It would be a different story. I don't think anybody is beating Djokovic here. He gets the YE#1 as a gift.
Worse players than Fed have beaten Djokovic this year. So it's any given day really. I mean Djokovic doesn't have many bad days, but when he does, you see upsets like Sam Querrey, Jiri Vesely, Marco Ceccinato, Dominic Thiem, Denis Istomin, etc.
Their seasons were close. But as always Djokovic takes the advantage of being a better player in the fall season.How is it a gift? He still has to win his remaining matches. And if he does, he’ll have 6 titles to Nadal’s 4, and 5 “big” titles to Nadal’s 4. More match wins on the season, more finals, etc. It would be a deserving number one, would it not?
.... for a week?If Roger wins this match I will not post 40-15 again to demonstrate my appreciation.
Of course they were close. Nadal can still finish number one here, even if he gets obliterated by Tsitsipas. I’d say he’s in a pretty good position, all things considered.Their seasons were close. But as always Djokovic takes the advantage of being a better player in the fall season.
5% is way too small, make it 25% to be more realistic. Someone like Ryan Harrison has a 5% chance of beating Djokovic, Fed is considerably more accomplished, to put it mildly.
Federer has been serving excruciatingly badly here this week. His first serve speed is oftentimes 110 MPH, which is a sitting duck for anyone, especially Djokovic. Annacone was puzzled why the serve has been so slow and predictable this event.
Yes, Nadal has only himself to blame. He had a terrible clay season by his standards. Losing Monte Carlo with only Fognini and Lajovic remaining in the draw was horrible. He found exactly "the right time" to show his worst clay tennis in 14 years. If he took these 640 points then his yesterday's win over Medvedev would give him the YE#1. But he messed it up.Of course they were close. Nadal can still finish number one here, even if he gets obliterated by Tsitsipas. I’d say he’s in a pretty good position, all things considered.
And knowing how good Djokovic is or can be in the fall, Nadal should have accumulated more points earlier in the year to make up for it. I don’t see why Djokovic being dominant in the fall makes his year any less impressive. There’s no “gifting” involved. Whoever ends up number one will have deserved it by earning it throughout the year, not this one tournament.
Novak won't. Fed might.With everything on the line, what will Novak do? Will he rise to the occasion or crap the bed against the old man?
The man won 2 GSs. I'd say he had a pretty good year regardless of his ranking. I doubt he's thinking about this too much.Yes, Nadal has only himself to blame. He had a terrible clay season by his standards. Losing Monte Carlo with only Fognini and Lajovic remaining in the draw was horrible. He found exactly "the right time" to show his worst clay tennis in 14 years. If he took these 640 points then his yesterday's win over Medvedev would give him the YE#1. But he messed it up.
If Novak wins, I will root for Nadal and Medvedev to win their matchesIf Federer wins, I put any Federer avatar of @Lleytonstation ’s choice till the end of the month.
True. On the flip side, if Novak stumbles here, he’ll rue his poor performance in three of his best events: Indian Wells, Miami, and the WTF. They’ve both had some missed opportunities this year.Yes, Nadal has only himself to blame. He had a terrible clay season by his standards. Losing Monte Carlo with only Fognini and Lajovic remaining in the draw was horrible. He found exactly "the right time" to show his worst clay tennis in 14 years. If he took these 640 points then his yesterday's win over Medvedev would give him the YE#1. But he messed it up.
You can't be cereal right now. You two are literally talking about the two players who split the Grand Slams as having "missed opportunities"?!?!?!True. On the flip side, if Novak stumbles here, he’ll rue his poor performance in three of his best events: Indian Wells, Miami, and the WTF. They’ve both had some missed opportunities this year.